PFD report

Josh Yemi TARRANT · Prevention of Future Deaths report

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

Issued 9 Feb 2026•Kent and Medway

Report record

Published report and response evidence

This page connects the concerns raised in this report with statements found in recipients’ published responses. A link shows a clear evidence connection; it does not assign responsibility.

View original report
Concerns
2

Raised in this report

Recipients
1

Named on the report

Responses found
1

Of 1 recipient

Stated actions
2

Described in responses

Recipients and published responses

Source document

Full report text

This is the full text from the original published report.

Open published report

Concerns and recipient responses

Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

Report evidence summary

Concerns raised2

  1. Lack of prison officer training in acute behavioural disturbance (ABD)
    Part of recurring concern: Failure to reliably recognise and respond to acute behavioural disturbancePart of recurring concern: Inadequate prison staff training for responding to medical emergencies
  2. Failure of prison officers to recognise ABD as a medical emergency
    Part of recurring concern: Failure to reliably recognise and respond to acute behavioural disturbance
Responses linked to these concerns

Each statement is shown once, even when linked to more than one concern.

Actions described in response An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.2

  1. Action

    Issue staff guidance explaining signs of Acute Behavioural Disturbance and appropriate escalation to healthcare professionals.

    Stated by HM Prison and Probation ServiceStated plannedThe respondent said that this action was planned when they made their response on 10 February 2026.
  2. Action

    Consult clinical expertise to inform written guidance on recognising and escalating potential Acute Behavioural Disturbance emergencies.

    Stated by HM Prison and Probation ServiceStated in progressThe respondent said that this action was in progress when they made their response on 10 February 2026.

Respondent positions A position is what a recipient says about a concern when it does not describe a specific action.1

  1. Position

    Diagnosis and response to Acute Behavioural Disturbance rest solely with healthcare professionals, while officers recognise indicators and escalate concerns.

    Stated by HM Prison and Probation ServiceRedirects responsibilityThe respondent said that another organisation was responsible for deciding or taking action.

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Lack of prison officer training in acute behavioural disturbance (ABD)

Wider context from the report

“HMPPS acknowledged that, despite this clear guidance, the Prison Service stopped teaching officers about ABD (aka ‘Excited Delirium’) in 2015 and have not taught it since then. None of the officers who gave evidence in this inquest said that they had never been given any training in relation to ABD. Dr ████████ explained that ABD is a well-recognised condition. Indeed, SEAmb witnesses provided evidence in this inquest that, if their call handlers are told that a person is displaying signs of ABD whilst under restraint, the response would be upgraded to aa Category 1 response and the immediate despatch of a Critical Care Paramedic (“CCP”). Dr ████████ also stated that: (1) Mr Tarrant was displaying ‘textbook’ signs of ABD which would have been apparent to a properly trained person within a matter of minutes; (2) It was clearly a medical emergency that required the attendance of a CCP who would have provided sedation and other treatments; (3) Had treatment been initiated at any time before 1 am Mr Tarrant probably would have survived. I am concerned that: (a) No training is provided to prison officers in relation to ABD (despite the clear advice of PSO 1600). (b) If officers who are required to restrain prisoners remain unaware of ABD and the need to treat it as a medical emergency, then further deaths are likely in future. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Failure to reliably recognise and respond to acute behavioural disturbance; Inadequate prison staff training for responding to medical emergencies.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure of prison officers to recognise ABD as a medical emergency

Wider context from the report

“HMPPS acknowledged that, despite this clear guidance, the Prison Service stopped teaching officers about ABD (aka ‘Excited Delirium’) in 2015 and have not taught it since then. None of the officers who gave evidence in this inquest said that they had never been given any training in relation to ABD. Dr ████████ explained that ABD is a well-recognised condition. Indeed, SEAmb witnesses provided evidence in this inquest that, if their call handlers are told that a person is displaying signs of ABD whilst under restraint, the response would be upgraded to aa Category 1 response and the immediate despatch of a Critical Care Paramedic (“CCP”). Dr ████████ also stated that: (1) Mr Tarrant was displaying ‘textbook’ signs of ABD which would have been apparent to a properly trained person within a matter of minutes; (2) It was clearly a medical emergency that required the attendance of a CCP who would have provided sedation and other treatments; (3) Had treatment been initiated at any time before 1 am Mr Tarrant probably would have survived. I am concerned that: (a) No training is provided to prison officers in relation to ABD (despite the clear advice of PSO 1600). (b) If officers who are required to restrain prisoners remain unaware of ABD and the need to treat it as a medical emergency, then further deaths are likely in future. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Failure to reliably recognise and respond to acute behavioural disturbance.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Issue staff guidance explaining signs of Acute Behavioural Disturbance and appropriate escalation to healthcare professionals.

Verbatim wording from the response

“In the period following the inquest, HMPPS has taken active steps to ensure staff are better supported in recognising and responding to behavioural and physiological indicators associated with ABD. We are currently consulting with ████████, whose clinical expertise is informing written guidance that will be issued to staff. This guidance is designed to equip officers with a clearer understanding of what signs may indicate ABD, while emphasising that the diagnosis and response to ABD rests solely with healthcare professionals. The intention is to ensure officers recognise potential medical emergencies quickly and escalate concerns appropriately.”

Source location

Response from HMP Elmley
Page 1 · response
Published 10 February 2026

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Consult clinical expertise to inform written guidance on recognising and escalating potential Acute Behavioural Disturbance emergencies.

Verbatim wording from the response

“In the period following the inquest, HMPPS has taken active steps to ensure staff are better supported in recognising and responding to behavioural and physiological indicators associated with ABD. We are currently consulting with ████████, whose clinical expertise is informing written guidance that will be issued to staff. This guidance is designed to equip officers with a clearer understanding of what signs may indicate ABD, while emphasising that the diagnosis and response to ABD rests solely with healthcare professionals. The intention is to ensure officers recognise potential medical emergencies quickly and escalate concerns appropriately.”

Source location

Response from HMP Elmley
Page 1 · response
Published 10 February 2026

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Diagnosis and response to Acute Behavioural Disturbance rest solely with healthcare professionals, while officers recognise indicators and escalate concerns.

Verbatim wording from the response

“In the period following the inquest, HMPPS has taken active steps to ensure staff are better supported in recognising and responding to behavioural and physiological indicators associated with ABD. We are currently consulting with ████████, whose clinical expertise is informing written guidance that will be issued to staff. This guidance is designed to equip officers with a clearer understanding of what signs may indicate ABD, while emphasising that the diagnosis and response to ABD rests solely with healthcare professionals. The intention is to ensure officers recognise potential medical emergencies quickly and escalate concerns appropriately.”

Source location

Response from HMP Elmley
Page 1 · response
Published 10 February 2026

Open published response
Back to top

Information checked against the published report and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Official responses located
1/1

Data last updated 7 September 2026