PFD report

Ann Hardman · Prevention of Future Deaths report

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

Issued 10 Oct 2016•Isle of Wight

Report record

Published report and response evidence

This page connects the concerns raised in this report with statements found in recipients’ published responses. A link shows a clear evidence connection; it does not assign responsibility.

View original report
Concerns
1

Raised in this report

Recipients
1

Named on the report

Responses found
1

Of 1 recipient

Stated actions
1

Described in responses

Recipients and published responses

Source document

Full report text

This is the full text from the original published report.

Open published report

Concerns and recipient responses

Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

Report evidence summary

Concerns raised1

  1. Failure to automatically arrange and communicate repeat DVT scanning after a negative scan
    Part of recurring concern: Failure to obtain clinically indicated repeat investigationsPart of recurring concern: Unreliable arrangement and communication of patient appointments and follow-up
Responses linked to these concerns

Each statement is shown once, even when linked to more than one concern.

Actions described in response An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.1

  1. Action

    Implement a follow-up system booking repeat ultrasound scans 6–8 days after a negative scan and notifying GP practices about non-attendance.

    Stated by Isle of Wight NHS TrustStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 19 February 2017.

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to automatically arrange and communicate repeat DVT scanning after a negative scan

Wider context from the report

“1. I am concerned that when there is a negative scan for a DVT at St Mary’s Hospital, the current protocol relies on the patient returning to their GP and being given another referral form for a further scan 6-8 days later. It was accepted that a better system would be one whereby the patient was automatically told to return for a further scan a week or so later by the ultrasound department, subject to the patient’s GP cancelling this scan, based on their clinical judgement of any review of the initial scan and/or any further examination of the patient. This would remove the chance of patients failing to be told to re-attend for a further scan. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Failure to obtain clinically indicated repeat investigations; Unreliable arrangement and communication of patient appointments and follow-up.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Implement a follow-up system booking repeat ultrasound scans 6–8 days after a negative scan and notifying GP practices about non-attendance.

Verbatim wording from the response

“I am therefore very pleased to report that we have implemented the following system in line with your suggestion:”

Source location

2016-0350-Response-by-Isle-of-Wight-NHS-Trust
Page 1 · response
Published 19 February 2017

Open published response
Back to top

Information checked against the published report and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Official responses located
1/1

Data last updated 7 September 2026