PFD report

Irene Whittingham · Prevention of Future Deaths report

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

Issued 28 Feb 2020•Manchester West

Report record

Published report and response evidence

This page connects the concerns raised in this report with statements found in recipients’ published responses. A link shows a clear evidence connection; it does not assign responsibility.

View original report
Concerns
3

Raised in this report

Recipients
3

Named on the report

Responses found
1

Of 3 recipients

Stated actions
1

Described in responses

Source document

Full report text

This is the full text from the original published report.

Open published report

Concerns and recipient responses

Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

Report evidence summary

Concerns raised3

  1. Conflicting guidance on timing of Vitamin D and Calcium blood level monitoring
    Part of recurring concern: Unreliable medication-specific blood-level monitoring
  2. Failure of prescribing software dropdown controls to prevent selection of excessive twice-daily loading doses
    Part of recurring concern: Unsafe medication prescribing
  3. Failure to provide community GPs with instructions on blood level monitoring during high-dose Vitamin D treatment
    Part of recurring concern: Failure to communicate clinically important information reliably between care servicesPart of recurring concern: Unreliable medication-specific blood-level monitoring
Responses linked to these concerns

Each statement is shown once, even when linked to more than one concern.

No linked response statements

No respondent-stated action or position is clearly linked to these concerns.

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Conflicting guidance on timing of Vitamin D and Calcium blood level monitoring

Wider context from the report

“1. Conflicting guidance is provided to treating clinicians as to when Vitamin D and Calcium blood level monitoring should be undertaken especially in patients who are given higher (loading) doses of Vitamin D, which exceeds the recommended national guidelines. The Consultant in Acute Adult Medicine gave evidence that the expected blood level monitoring to have taken place within 4 weeks of the loaded Vitamin D commencing, whereas the Endocrinologist, gave evidence that he expected the blood level monitoring to take place around the 3 month period elapsed the course of medication had been completed. In any event, no advice or instructions were issued to the deceased GP, regarding any requirement to monitor the deceased blood levels whilst she was in the community and taking high levels of Vitamin D which exceeded national guidelines. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Unreliable medication-specific blood-level monitoring.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure of prescribing software dropdown controls to prevent selection of excessive twice-daily loading doses

Wider context from the report

“3. The WellSky and EMIS Software, had a confusing user drop down menu option, which allowed the user to click on a twice daily dose despite the loaded dosage, exceeding national guidelines. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Unsafe medication prescribing.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to provide community GPs with instructions on blood level monitoring during high-dose Vitamin D treatment

Wider context from the report

“1. Conflicting guidance is provided to treating clinicians as to when Vitamin D and Calcium blood level monitoring should be undertaken especially in patients who are given higher (loading) doses of Vitamin D, which exceeds the recommended national guidelines. The Consultant in Acute Adult Medicine gave evidence that the expected blood level monitoring to have taken place within 4 weeks of the loaded Vitamin D commencing, whereas the Endocrinologist, gave evidence that he expected the blood level monitoring to take place around the 3 month period elapsed the course of medication had been completed. In any event, no advice or instructions were issued to the deceased GP, regarding any requirement to monitor the deceased blood levels whilst she was in the community and taking high levels of Vitamin D which exceeded national guidelines. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Failure to communicate clinically important information reliably between care services; Unreliable medication-specific blood-level monitoring.

Open source report

Other statements in published responses

These actions and other statements could not be clearly connected to one concern in this report.

Recipient-stated actions An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.1

  1. 1

    Develop a prescribing guideline to standardise and support safe colecalciferol prescribing and administration for adult patients.

    Stated by Bolton NHS Foundation TrustStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 9 March 2020.

Recipient positions A position is what a recipient says about a concern when they do not describe a specific action.1

  1. 1

    Existing guidance is considered sufficient for colecalciferol prescribing in patients under 18, so no additional guidance is described for that group.

    Stated by Bolton NHS Foundation TrustExisting arrangements considered sufficientThe respondent said that existing arrangements were sufficient, so no further action was needed.

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Develop a prescribing guideline to standardise and support safe colecalciferol prescribing and administration for adult patients.

Verbatim wording from the response

“In order to address the concern, the attached prescribing guideline has been developed by the Clinical Pharmacy Team with contributions by the specialist doctors. The guideline will standardise and support the safe prescribing and administration of colecalciferol in adult patients. With regards to the prescribing of colecalciferol to patients under the age of 18 the Trust has guidance already in place and use.”

Source location

2020-0047-Response-from-Bolton-NHS-Foundation-Trust-Redacted
Page 1 · response
Published 9 March 2020

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Existing guidance is considered sufficient for colecalciferol prescribing in patients under 18, so no additional guidance is described for that group.

Verbatim wording from the response

“In order to address the concern, the attached prescribing guideline has been developed by the Clinical Pharmacy Team with contributions by the specialist doctors. The guideline will standardise and support the safe prescribing and administration of colecalciferol in adult patients. With regards to the prescribing of colecalciferol to patients under the age of 18 the Trust has guidance already in place and use.”

Source location

2020-0047-Response-from-Bolton-NHS-Foundation-Trust-Redacted
Page 1 · response
Published 9 March 2020

Open published response
Back to top

Information checked against the published report and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Official responses located
1/3

Data last updated 7 September 2026