Luke Anthony Flynn · Prevention of Future Deaths report

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

Issued 22 Jun 2022•North London

Published report and response evidence

This report’s concerns and statements found in recipients’ published responses. Statements are included even where no link to an individual concern is recorded. A link shows an evidence connection; it does not assign responsibility.

View original report
Concerns
1

Raised in this report

Recipients
1

Named on the report

Responses found
1

Of 1 recipient

Stated actions
1

Described in responses

Recipients and published responses

Full report text

This is the full text from the original published report.

Open published report

Concerns and recipient responses

Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

Concerns raised1

  1. Lack of a MET Police policy governing the use of handcuffs when medical staff request their use for hospital patients being treated for a medical condition

Stated actions An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.1

  1. Metropolitan Police Service

    Publish and implement a handcuff policy requiring officers to assess proportionality, necessity, legality and ethics and justify decisions in writing after the event.

Respondent positions A position is what a recipient says about a concern when it does not describe a specific action.1

  1. Metropolitan Police Service

    Existing handcuff policy and legal powers sufficiently guide healthcare-setting decisions, so no policy change addressing that specific scenario is considered appropriate.

    Existing arrangements considered sufficientThe respondent said that existing arrangements were sufficient, so no further action was needed.

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Lack of a MET Police policy governing the use of handcuffs when medical staff request their use for hospital patients being treated for a medical condition

Wider context from the report

“1. That there is no MET Police policy covering the use handcuffs when medical staff request their use with a patient in hospital for treatment with a medical condition rather than a mental health condition. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

No recurring-concern membership is currently published.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Publish and implement a handcuff policy requiring officers to assess proportionality, necessity, legality and ethics and justify decisions in writing after the event.

Verbatim wording from the response

“The officers’ decision to handcuff Mr Flynn remained with them to justify (this is supported by the literature previously provided to you in our solicitor’s e-mail dated 16th December 2021). This point is set out in the new Metropolitan Police Handcuff policy (published in November 2021). Officers are expected to make their own assessment of the circumstances in which they find themselves, and on that basis take action (or inaction) based on proportionality, necessity, legality and ethics, whilst fully justifying their decisions in writing post event. Although the policy does not specifically address the use of handcuffs in a healthcare setting for medical treatment, upon reviewing both the policy and the legal powers afforded to officers, both are sufficiently robust to allow officers to make an informed decision as to the use of handcuffs in any given setting.”

Source location

Response from Metropolitan Police
Page 2 · response
Published 22 September 2022

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Existing handcuff policy and legal powers sufficiently guide healthcare-setting decisions, so no policy change addressing that specific scenario is considered appropriate.

Verbatim wording from the response

“The officers’ decision to handcuff Mr Flynn remained with them to justify (this is supported by the literature previously provided to you in our solicitor’s e-mail dated 16th December 2021). This point is set out in the new Metropolitan Police Handcuff policy (published in November 2021). Officers are expected to make their own assessment of the circumstances in which they find themselves, and on that basis take action (or inaction) based on proportionality, necessity, legality and ethics, whilst fully justifying their decisions in writing post event. Although the policy does not specifically address the use of handcuffs in a healthcare setting for medical treatment, upon reviewing both the policy and the legal powers afforded to officers, both are sufficiently robust to allow officers to make an informed decision as to the use of handcuffs in any given setting.”

Source location

Response from Metropolitan Police
Page 2 · response
Published 22 September 2022

Open published response
Back to top

Information checked against the published report and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Data last updated 7 September 2026