PFD report

Stuart Michael CLARK · Prevention of Future Deaths report

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

Issued 3 Apr 2019•Exeter and Greater Devon

Report record

Published report and response evidence

This page connects the concerns raised in this report with statements found in recipients’ published responses. A link shows a clear evidence connection; it does not assign responsibility.

View original report
Concerns
3

Raised in this report

Recipients
1

Named on the report

Responses found
1

Of 1 recipient

Stated actions
4

Described in responses

Source document

Full report text

This is the full text from the original published report.

Open published report

Concerns and recipient responses

Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

Report evidence summary

Concerns raised3

  1. Failure to assess disclosed risk of self-harm or suicide
    Part of recurring concern: Unreliable assessment of suicide and self-harm risk
  2. Failure to directly inform senior clinical staff of disclosed suicide risk
    Part of recurring concern: Failure to escalate patient-safety concerns to senior oversightPart of recurring concern: Failure to escalate significant clinical concerns to appropriately senior cliniciansPart of recurring concern: Unreliable communication of patient-care information between clinical staff
  3. Delays in recording clinically significant disclosures in medical notes
    Part of recurring concern: Unreliable recording of safety-critical mental health information
Responses linked to these concerns

Each statement is shown once, even when linked to more than one concern.

Actions described in response An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.3

  1. Action

    Run a two-day professional leadership forum to reinforce individual responsibility and accountability for patient safety and suicide prevention, with learning cascaded to teams.

    Stated by Royal Devon University Healthcare NHS Foundation TrustStated plannedThe respondent said that this action was planned when they made their response on 15 July 2019.
  2. Action

    Review current training and support for recognising risk, escalating concerns and safeguarding adults.

    Stated by Royal Devon University Healthcare NHS Foundation TrustStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 15 July 2019.
  3. Action

    Issue a safeguarding newsletter reminder about procedures following disclosures of possible suicidal intent, including the suicide-support leaflet.

    Stated by Royal Devon University Healthcare NHS Foundation TrustStated plannedThe respondent said that this action was planned when they made their response on 15 July 2019.

Respondent positions A position is what a recipient says about a concern when it does not describe a specific action.2

  1. Position

    The incident is considered isolated, and staff are considered aware of their safeguarding obligations and required actions.

    Stated by Royal Devon University Healthcare NHS Foundation TrustDisputes the concernThe respondent disagreed with part of the concern or the basis for it.

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to assess disclosed risk of self-harm or suicide

Wider context from the report

“(1) The evidence revealed that Mr CLARK disclosed to a member of nursing staff on Lowman (Canpere) Ward at the Royal Devon and Exeter Hospital that he was a vulnerable adult and a suicide risk. This disclosure was not followed up with an assessment to determine if Mr CLARK had any intent, plan or history of self-harm or suicide. An assessment would have helped determine his risk and inform the decision on a referral to mental health services. Senior clinical staff were not directly informed of the disclosure. The SHO Dr responsible for Mr CLARK stated in her evidence that had she known about the disclosure she would have assessed his risk of self-harm and suicide, and if appropriate she would have referred him to the mental health services. The nurse made an entry in the medical records; however, the medical notes were not made up until the end of the day and therefore the information was not available to the other staff at the relevant time. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Unreliable assessment of suicide and self-harm risk.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to directly inform senior clinical staff of disclosed suicide risk

Wider context from the report

“(1) The evidence revealed that Mr CLARK disclosed to a member of nursing staff on Lowman (Canpere) Ward at the Royal Devon and Exeter Hospital that he was a vulnerable adult and a suicide risk. This disclosure was not followed up with an assessment to determine if Mr CLARK had any intent, plan or history of self-harm or suicide. An assessment would have helped determine his risk and inform the decision on a referral to mental health services. Senior clinical staff were not directly informed of the disclosure. The SHO Dr responsible for Mr CLARK stated in her evidence that had she known about the disclosure she would have assessed his risk of self-harm and suicide, and if appropriate she would have referred him to the mental health services. The nurse made an entry in the medical records; however, the medical notes were not made up until the end of the day and therefore the information was not available to the other staff at the relevant time. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Failure to escalate patient-safety concerns to senior oversight; Failure to escalate significant clinical concerns to appropriately senior clinicians; Unreliable communication of patient-care information between clinical staff.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Delays in recording clinically significant disclosures in medical notes

Wider context from the report

“(1) The evidence revealed that Mr CLARK disclosed to a member of nursing staff on Lowman (Canpere) Ward at the Royal Devon and Exeter Hospital that he was a vulnerable adult and a suicide risk. This disclosure was not followed up with an assessment to determine if Mr CLARK had any intent, plan or history of self-harm or suicide. An assessment would have helped determine his risk and inform the decision on a referral to mental health services. Senior clinical staff were not directly informed of the disclosure. The SHO Dr responsible for Mr CLARK stated in her evidence that had she known about the disclosure she would have assessed his risk of self-harm and suicide, and if appropriate she would have referred him to the mental health services. The nurse made an entry in the medical records; however, the medical notes were not made up until the end of the day and therefore the information was not available to the other staff at the relevant time. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Unreliable recording of safety-critical mental health information.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Run a two-day professional leadership forum to reinforce individual responsibility and accountability for patient safety and suicide prevention, with learning cascaded to teams.

Verbatim wording from the response

“However, the Trust is always seeking to improve safety for its patients. We will be reinforcing individual responsibility and accountability for patient safety and suicide prevention to all staff. In June 2019, the Trust is running a two day ‘Care Matters’ professional leadership forum for Nurses, Allied Health Professionals and midwives. These sessions will be run and delivered in person by ████████ ████████ Deputy Chief Executive/Chief Nurse, and will reach over 100 leads who will then cascade to their respective teams. The focus of this forum is Professional Safety and this case will be used during this forum as an example to reiterate the importance of escalating concerns about vulnerable patients to ensure the appropriate assessments and support can be provided to them.”

Source location

2019-0125-Response-by-Royal-Devon-and-Exeter-NHS-Trust
Page 2 · response
Published 15 July 2019

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Review current training and support for recognising risk, escalating concerns and safeguarding adults.

Verbatim wording from the response

““review procedures and training related to the actions to be taken when a disclosure is made to ward staff giving rise to the suspicion of the risk of self-harm or suicide”.”

Source location

2019-0125-Response-by-Royal-Devon-and-Exeter-NHS-Trust
Page 1 · response
Published 15 July 2019

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Issue a safeguarding newsletter reminder about procedures following disclosures of possible suicidal intent, including the suicide-support leaflet.

Verbatim wording from the response

“The Trust is satisfied that this was an isolated incident and staff are aware of their safeguarding obligations. However, the Safeguarding Team is going to issue a reminder to all staff in an upcoming newsletter (which reaches all clinical staff) about safeguarding procedures when there is a disclosure about possible suicidal intent. This briefing will include information about the ‘It’s safe to talk about suicide’ leaflet, a copy of which is attached. This is available on the Trust’s safeguarding intranet page but we want to raise awareness further of this issue. The leaflet was produced by Exeter Medical School in conjunction with Suicide Charities and Devon County Council for staff to use to support people when suicidal intention is disclosed.”

Source location

2019-0125-Response-by-Royal-Devon-and-Exeter-NHS-Trust
Page 2 · response
Published 15 July 2019

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

The incident is considered isolated, and staff are considered aware of their safeguarding obligations and required actions.

Verbatim wording from the response

“The Trust is satisfied that this was an isolated incident and staff are aware of their safeguarding obligations. However, the Safeguarding Team is going to issue a reminder to all staff in an upcoming newsletter (which reaches all clinical staff) about safeguarding procedures when there is a disclosure about possible suicidal intent. This briefing will include information about the ‘It’s safe to talk about suicide’ leaflet, a copy of which is attached. This is available on the Trust’s safeguarding intranet page but we want to raise awareness further of this issue. The leaflet was produced by Exeter Medical School in conjunction with Suicide Charities and Devon County Council for staff to use to support people when suicidal intention is disclosed.”

Source location

2019-0125-Response-by-Royal-Devon-and-Exeter-NHS-Trust
Page 2 · response
Published 15 July 2019

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Existing training, policies, safeguarding support and mental health provision are considered sufficient to ensure staff recognise and escalate suicide risks.

Verbatim wording from the response

“There is a mandatory training programme that is completed by all staff on induction with the Trust, whatever their role. Regular updates are required at a maximum interval of every three years. The training programme has the following objectives:”

Source location

2019-0125-Response-by-Royal-Devon-and-Exeter-NHS-Trust
Page 1 · response
Published 15 July 2019

Open published response

Other statements in published responses

These actions and other statements could not be clearly connected to one concern in this report.

Recipient-stated actions An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.1

  1. 1

    Review the Trust’s provision again in light of the Safer Devon Partnership’s suicide-prevention review.

    Stated by Royal Devon University Healthcare NHS Foundation TrustStated plannedThe respondent said that this action was planned when they made their response on 15 July 2019.

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Review the Trust’s provision again in light of the Safer Devon Partnership’s suicide-prevention review.

Verbatim wording from the response

“The Safer Devon Partnership, which is the statutory County Strategy Group, which provides strategic leadership for addressing community safety issues affecting vulnerable people, currently have a group reviewing suicide prevention. We will be reviewing our provision again in light of this review. Specific training has been provided from Devon Partnership Trust for our highest risk areas, AMU and Emergency Department. The Trust has mental health support available 24 hours a day from our liaison psychiatry service provided by Devon Partnership Trust.”

Source location

2019-0125-Response-by-Royal-Devon-and-Exeter-NHS-Trust
Page 2 · response
Published 15 July 2019

Open published response
Back to top

Information checked against the published report and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Official responses located
1/1

Data last updated 7 September 2026