PFD report

Rosemary Scott · Prevention of Future Deaths report

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

Issued 5 Jun 2018•Dorset

Report record

Published report and response evidence

This page connects the concerns raised in this report with statements found in recipients’ published responses. A link shows a clear evidence connection; it does not assign responsibility.

View original report
Concerns
3

Raised in this report

Recipients
1

Named on the report

Responses found
1

Of 1 recipient

Stated actions
4

Described in responses

Source document

Full report text

This is the full text from the original published report.

Open published report

Concerns and recipient responses

Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

Report evidence summary

Concerns raised3

  1. Lack of a reminder system for required venous blood gas measurements
    Part of recurring concern: Failure to provide timely clinically required blood tests
  2. Insufficient availability of machines to provide PEEP to patients who require it
  3. Failure to measure venous blood gases when required by the Sepsis Six Pathway
Responses linked to these concerns

Each statement is shown once, even when linked to more than one concern.

Actions described in response An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.4

  1. Action

    Establish a divisional plan to address PEEP machine availability.

    Stated by Dorset County Hospital NHS Foundation TrustStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 8 July 2018.
  2. Action

    Decontaminate the unavailable PEEP unit and return it to service.

    Stated by Dorset County Hospital NHS Foundation TrustStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 8 July 2018.
  3. Action

    Rent and deliver three loan PEEP units to increase available capacity.

    Stated by Dorset County Hospital NHS Foundation TrustStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 8 July 2018.

Respondent positions A position is what a recipient says about a concern when it does not describe a specific action.3

  1. Position

    Existing handover and clinical monitoring systems are considered sufficient; a blanket venous blood gas reminder cannot accommodate individual clinical judgment.

    Stated by Dorset County Hospital NHS Foundation TrustExisting arrangements considered sufficientThe respondent said that existing arrangements were sufficient, so no further action was needed.

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Lack of a reminder system for required venous blood gas measurements

Wider context from the report

“2. I have concerns with regard to the following: i. Due to the lack of a reminder system in relation to measuring venous blood gases it was not known whether the respiratory support being provided to Mrs Scott should have been escalated to a BiPAP or CPAP. I request that a review is undertaken to assess whether there should be a system installed to ensure the staff caring for patients where venous blood gases should have been measured are “reminded” of the need to do so. ii. The insufficient number of machines to provide PEEP to patients who require it. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Failure to provide timely clinically required blood tests.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Insufficient availability of machines to provide PEEP to patients who require it

Wider context from the report

“2. I have concerns with regard to the following: i. Due to the lack of a reminder system in relation to measuring venous blood gases it was not known whether the respiratory support being provided to Mrs Scott should have been escalated to a BiPAP or CPAP. I request that a review is undertaken to assess whether there should be a system installed to ensure the staff caring for patients where venous blood gases should have been measured are “reminded” of the need to do so. ii. The insufficient number of machines to provide PEEP to patients who require it. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

No recurring-concern membership is currently published.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to measure venous blood gases when required by the Sepsis Six Pathway

Wider context from the report

“1. During the inquest evidence was heard that: i. Venous blood gases were not measured on the second admission (25th December to 30th December), in accordance with the Sepsis Six Pathway. There appeared to be no reminder system in place to address this omission. I heard evidence that measuring the carbon dioxide levels would have assisted in determining whether the high flow machine was providing the level of respiratory support Mrs Scott required. ii. There were initially no means to provide PEEP to a patient that was deemed to need it, due to all machines being in use, or there simply being no machine in respiratory medicine. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

No recurring-concern membership is currently published.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Establish a divisional plan to address PEEP machine availability.

Verbatim wording from the response

“The medical records dated 28 December 2017, indicate that on only three PEEP machines were available across the hospital and that there was difficulty in locating one for use by Mrs Scott. I have investigated this matter and I would advise you that the Trust actually has 6 machines. However, at the time of Mrs Scott’s admission, two machines had been taken out of service as they were physically damaged and were being repaired. This left the Trust with four units. This concern was discussed at a Divisional level and a plan was put in place.”

Source location

2018-0172-Response-by-Dorset-County-Hospital-NHS-Trust
Page 2 · response
Published 8 July 2018

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Decontaminate the unavailable PEEP unit and return it to service.

Verbatim wording from the response

“On 27 December 2017, a further unit was taken out of service for infection control reasons, which left three units across the hospital. The unit was decontaminated and returned to service on 29 December 2017.”

Source location

2018-0172-Response-by-Dorset-County-Hospital-NHS-Trust
Page 2 · response
Published 8 July 2018

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Rent and deliver three loan PEEP units to increase available capacity.

Verbatim wording from the response

“On 28 December 2017, three loan units were rented for a period of two months and were delivered to site on 29 December 2017. This meant that between 08:00hrs to 15:00hrs three units were available, but by 16:00hrs, six units were available.”

Source location

2018-0172-Response-by-Dorset-County-Hospital-NHS-Trust
Page 2 · response
Published 8 July 2018

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Submit a requisition for two replacement PEEP units.

Verbatim wording from the response

“I would also advise you that over this period the Trust had no incidents reported in relation to the unavailability of the units, and patient care had not been compromised. This incident was the first reported, therefore there is no evidence of a systemic issue/failure or a trend with respect to safety related to the unavailability of equipment. The rental units were in place within hours of the request being submitted, and a requisition for two replacement units was placed on 25 January 2018.”

Source location

2018-0172-Response-by-Dorset-County-Hospital-NHS-Trust
Page 2 · response
Published 8 July 2018

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Existing handover and clinical monitoring systems are considered sufficient; a blanket venous blood gas reminder cannot accommodate individual clinical judgment.

Verbatim wording from the response

“I have been informed that it would be clearly indicated in the medical records that staff within the emergency department had been unable to access veins to gain venous gases. The decision, as to whether these would be clinically necessary would lie with the clinicians. As a patient’s condition changes, the clinical review of tests required can change. This is part of the individual clinician’s judgement and assessment of the patient.”

Source location

2018-0172-Response-by-Dorset-County-Hospital-NHS-Trust
Page 1 · response
Published 8 July 2018

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

A suitable alternative PEEP unit was in place under the consultant’s care plan, so patient care was not compromised during the temporary shortage.

Verbatim wording from the response

“On reviewing the records and the events, Mrs Scott was without the unit for only a few hours and this was neither detrimental to her care, nor a factor in her death. A suitable alternative was in place and in use, as per the consultant’s care plan.”

Source location

2018-0172-Response-by-Dorset-County-Hospital-NHS-Trust
Page 2 · response
Published 8 July 2018

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

The Trust disputes that equipment shortages represented a systemic safety issue, noting temporary damage, rapid restoration, and no evidence of compromised patient care.

Verbatim wording from the response

“The medical records dated 28 December 2017, indicate that on only three PEEP machines were available across the hospital and that there was difficulty in locating one for use by Mrs Scott. I have investigated this matter and I would advise you that the Trust actually has 6 machines. However, at the time of Mrs Scott’s admission, two machines had been taken out of service as they were physically damaged and were being repaired. This left the Trust with four units. This concern was discussed at a Divisional level and a plan was put in place.”

Source location

2018-0172-Response-by-Dorset-County-Hospital-NHS-Trust
Page 2 · response
Published 8 July 2018

Open published response
Back to top

Information checked against the published report and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Official responses located
1/1

Data last updated 7 September 2026