PFD report

Edith Millington · Prevention of Future Deaths report

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

Issued 27 Mar 2026•Manchester South

Report record

Published report and response evidence

This page connects the concerns raised in this report with statements found in recipients’ published responses. A link shows a clear evidence connection; it does not assign responsibility.

View original report
Concerns
4

Raised in this report

Recipients
1

Named on the report

Responses found
1

Of 1 recipient

Stated actions
4

Described in responses

Recipients and published responses

Source document

Full report text

This is the full text from the original published report.

Open published report

Concerns and recipient responses

Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

Report evidence summary

Concerns raised4

  1. Access ramp that is too short and therefore too steep
    Part of recurring concern: Inadequate safety controls for access ramps
  2. Failure to secure the rubber ramp mat against movement
    Part of recurring concern: Inadequate safety controls for access ramps
  3. Absence of external, easily accessible handrails on the access ramp
    Part of recurring concern: Inadequate handrail safety on steps and access rampsPart of recurring concern: Inadequate safety controls for access ramps
Responses linked to these concerns

Each statement is shown once, even when linked to more than one concern.

Actions described in response An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.2

  1. Action

    Install fixed grab rails on both sides of the entrance to improve customer support and stability.

    Stated by Sai Skn LimitedStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 7 April 2026.
  2. Action

    Remove the metal access ramp and replace the former ramp arrangement with a small, stable entrance step.

    Stated by Sai Skn LimitedStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 7 April 2026.

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Access ramp that is too short and therefore too steep

Wider context from the report

“The evidence, today, of your store supervisor ████████ was that the ramp remains exactly as it was on the day of EM’s fatal accident. It is my opinion that the structure/design of the ramp makes it unsafe. In particular that the ramp itself is not fixed or secured to the ground (not even semi-fixed so that it can be removed at the end of the day), that the rubber mat is not fixed and can easily move (as seen), there are no external easily accessible handrails, and the ramp is too short making the slope steeper. The issue of concern is that unless action is taken to render access to the store by way of a safer design of ramp then there is a high risk of a customer, particularly a customer with mobility issues, suffering a similar and fatal fall as EM. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Inadequate safety controls for access ramps.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to secure the rubber ramp mat against movement

Wider context from the report

“The evidence, today, of your store supervisor ████████ was that the ramp remains exactly as it was on the day of EM’s fatal accident. It is my opinion that the structure/design of the ramp makes it unsafe. In particular that the ramp itself is not fixed or secured to the ground (not even semi-fixed so that it can be removed at the end of the day), that the rubber mat is not fixed and can easily move (as seen), there are no external easily accessible handrails, and the ramp is too short making the slope steeper. The issue of concern is that unless action is taken to render access to the store by way of a safer design of ramp then there is a high risk of a customer, particularly a customer with mobility issues, suffering a similar and fatal fall as EM. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Inadequate safety controls for access ramps.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Absence of external, easily accessible handrails on the access ramp

Wider context from the report

“The evidence, today, of your store supervisor ████████ was that the ramp remains exactly as it was on the day of EM’s fatal accident. It is my opinion that the structure/design of the ramp makes it unsafe. In particular that the ramp itself is not fixed or secured to the ground (not even semi-fixed so that it can be removed at the end of the day), that the rubber mat is not fixed and can easily move (as seen), there are no external easily accessible handrails, and the ramp is too short making the slope steeper. The issue of concern is that unless action is taken to render access to the store by way of a safer design of ramp then there is a high risk of a customer, particularly a customer with mobility issues, suffering a similar and fatal fall as EM. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Inadequate handrail safety on steps and access ramps; Inadequate safety controls for access ramps.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to fix or secure the access ramp to the ground

Wider context from the report

“The evidence, today, of your store supervisor ████████ was that the ramp remains exactly as it was on the day of EM’s fatal accident. It is my opinion that the structure/design of the ramp makes it unsafe. In particular that the ramp itself is not fixed or secured to the ground (not even semi-fixed so that it can be removed at the end of the day), that the rubber mat is not fixed and can easily move (as seen), there are no external easily accessible handrails, and the ramp is too short making the slope steeper. The issue of concern is that unless action is taken to render access to the store by way of a safer design of ramp then there is a high risk of a customer, particularly a customer with mobility issues, suffering a similar and fatal fall as EM. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Inadequate safety controls for access ramps.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Install fixed grab rails on both sides of the entrance to improve customer support and stability.

Verbatim wording from the response

“• Additional fixed grab rails have been installed on both sides of the entrance to provide improved support and stability for customers entering and exiting the store.”

Source location

Response from Sai SKN Ltd
Page 1 · response
Published 7 April 2026

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Remove the metal access ramp and replace the former ramp arrangement with a small, stable entrance step.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Following a full review of the incident and the issues identified, with further consultation and input from ████████ from Trafford Council we have taken immediate corrective action in respect of the entrance to our premises.”

Source location

Response from Sai SKN Ltd
Page 1 · response
Published 7 April 2026

Open published response

Other statements in published responses

These actions and other statements could not be clearly connected to one concern in this report.

Recipient-stated actions An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.2

  1. 1

    Display warning signs and wall reflectors to alert customers to the entrance step.

    Stated by Sai Skn LimitedStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 7 April 2026.
  2. 2

    Continue reviewing premises and procedures to uphold appropriate safety standards.

    Stated by Sai Skn LimitedStated in progressThe respondent said that this action was in progress when they made their response on 7 April 2026.

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Display warning signs and wall reflectors to alert customers to the entrance step.

Verbatim wording from the response

“• Warning signs in place to remind about the step and reflectors have been sticked on the wall to warn customers about the step.”

Source location

Response from Sai SKN Ltd
Page 1 · response
Published 7 April 2026

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Continue reviewing premises and procedures to uphold appropriate safety standards.

Verbatim wording from the response

“We remain committed to maintaining a safe environment for all customers and will continue to review our premises and procedures to ensure appropriate safety standards are upheld.”

Source location

Response from Sai SKN Ltd
Page 2 · response
Published 7 April 2026

Open published response
Back to top

Information checked against the published report and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Official responses located
1/1

Data last updated 7 September 2026