PFD report

Lewys Ryan Aidan CRAWFORD · Prevention of Future Deaths report

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

Issued 28 Feb 2020•South Wales Central

Report record

Published report and response evidence

This page connects the concerns raised in this report with statements found in recipients’ published responses. A link shows a clear evidence connection; it does not assign responsibility.

View original report
Concerns
6

Raised in this report

Recipients
1

Named on the report

Responses found
0

Of 1 recipient

Stated actions
0

Described in responses

Recipients and published responses

Source document

Full report text

This is the full text from the original published report.

Open published report

Concerns and recipient responses

Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

Report evidence summary

Concerns raised6

  1. Gaps in agency nurse training and understanding of septic screening procedures
    Part of recurring concern: Failure to reliably recognise and respond promptly to sepsisPart of recurring concern: Inadequate competence assurance and induction for agency staff
  2. Lack of competent A&E consultant knowledge and understanding for identifying and diagnosing sepsis in babies and very young children
    Part of recurring concern: Inadequate clinical competence to recognise and treat paediatric sepsis
  3. Failure to use and record clear, continuing sepsis terminology in suspected sepsis patients
    Part of recurring concern: Failure to reliably recognise and respond promptly to sepsisPart of recurring concern: Inconsistent paediatric sepsis recognition and response guidance
Responses linked to these concerns

Each statement is shown once, even when linked to more than one concern.

No linked response statements

No respondent-stated action or position is clearly linked to these concerns.

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Gaps in agency nurse training and understanding of septic screening procedures

Wider context from the report

“(2) There needs to be a greater understanding of, and reference to the NICE Sepsis risk stratification tool: children aged under 5 years in hospital by Clinicians and Nurses in both the A & E & Paediatric depts. Whilst it is appreciated that the finalisation of a bespoke sepsis tool, based upon the UK Sepsis Trust’s Tools and Pathways is awaited, until such time as its adopted, the Health Board needs to address apparent lapses in the understanding of what is required upon diagnosis of a potentially septic baby/child, particularly in the period between triage and admission to the ward. Specifically, the importance of stabilising the patient prior to transfer by completing a full septic screen. Furthermore, the Inquest highlighted gaps in the understanding and knowledge of agency nurses as to the septic screen and the steps to be followed. The Health Board needs a clear policy (and to ensure this is implemented & followed) to ensure that agency nurses are up to date with their training and understanding in this area of practice. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Failure to reliably recognise and respond promptly to sepsis; Inadequate competence assurance and induction for agency staff.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Lack of competent A&E consultant knowledge and understanding for identifying and diagnosing sepsis in babies and very young children

Wider context from the report

“(1) A potential deficiency in the knowledge and understanding of A & E Consultants coving in the paediatric A & E Department (whilst there is no on site consultant in paediatric emergency medicine) in the identification/diagnosis of sepsis in babies and very young children. Whilst it is appreciated that the quest to recruit further consultants in paediatric emergency medicine to provide more comprehensive cover in the Department continues, until such time as a sufficient complement is in place, and A & E Consultants provide some of the cover, the Health Board must ensure that those that do, are urgently and adequately trained to a competent standard to deliver the care required. It cannot be simply left to the individual consultants to determine their own requirements in this regard. As their employers, the Health Board, has an overarching obligation to ensure that competent staff are employed and to maintain high professional standards. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Inadequate clinical competence to recognise and treat paediatric sepsis.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to use and record clear, continuing sepsis terminology in suspected sepsis patients

Wider context from the report

“(3) Guidance and instruction to both clinicians and nurses as to the appropriate use (and recording) of terminology should be considered in suspected sepsis patients. There was a degree of confusion in both the A & E & Paediatric Departments caused by the interchangeable use of sepsis and bacterial infection as to what treatment should be initiated/progressed depending on which description was used. If sepsis is suspected, that clear and continuing reference ought to be maintained, if, and until it is superseded by an alternative diagnosis. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Failure to reliably recognise and respond promptly to sepsis; Inconsistent paediatric sepsis recognition and response guidance.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Insufficient clinician and nurse use of the NICE Sepsis risk stratification tool for children aged under 5 years

Wider context from the report

“(2) There needs to be a greater understanding of, and reference to the NICE Sepsis risk stratification tool: children aged under 5 years in hospital by Clinicians and Nurses in both the A & E & Paediatric depts. Whilst it is appreciated that the finalisation of a bespoke sepsis tool, based upon the UK Sepsis Trust’s Tools and Pathways is awaited, until such time as its adopted, the Health Board needs to address apparent lapses in the understanding of what is required upon diagnosis of a potentially septic baby/child, particularly in the period between triage and admission to the ward. Specifically, the importance of stabilising the patient prior to transfer by completing a full septic screen. Furthermore, the Inquest highlighted gaps in the understanding and knowledge of agency nurses as to the septic screen and the steps to be followed. The Health Board needs a clear policy (and to ensure this is implemented & followed) to ensure that agency nurses are up to date with their training and understanding in this area of practice. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Inadequate clinical competence to recognise and treat paediatric sepsis.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to consider alternative antibiotic administration routes when cannulation is unsuitable

Wider context from the report

“(4) In suspected sepsis patients, particularly babies, guidance and instruction needs to be emphasised to clinicians & nurses as to alternative methods of administration of antibiotics. Evidence at Inquest demonstrated that there were failures to consider alternatives to cannulation for IV antibiotics, such as intra-muscularly or intra-osseously. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Failure to provide timely antibiotic treatment for suspected or confirmed infection.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to complete a full septic screen and stabilise potentially septic babies and children before ward transfer

Wider context from the report

“(2) There needs to be a greater understanding of, and reference to the NICE Sepsis risk stratification tool: children aged under 5 years in hospital by Clinicians and Nurses in both the A & E & Paediatric depts. Whilst it is appreciated that the finalisation of a bespoke sepsis tool, based upon the UK Sepsis Trust’s Tools and Pathways is awaited, until such time as its adopted, the Health Board needs to address apparent lapses in the understanding of what is required upon diagnosis of a potentially septic baby/child, particularly in the period between triage and admission to the ward. Specifically, the importance of stabilising the patient prior to transfer by completing a full septic screen. Furthermore, the Inquest highlighted gaps in the understanding and knowledge of agency nurses as to the septic screen and the steps to be followed. The Health Board needs a clear policy (and to ensure this is implemented & followed) to ensure that agency nurses are up to date with their training and understanding in this area of practice. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

No recurring-concern membership is currently published.

Open source report
Back to top

Information checked against the published report and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Official responses located
0/1

Data last updated 7 September 2026

No official response is included in the current published snapshot.