Karl Mitchell · Prevention of Future Deaths report

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

Issued 22 May 2023•Avon

Published report and response evidence

This report’s concerns and statements found in recipients’ published responses. Statements are included even where no link to an individual concern is recorded. A link shows an evidence connection; it does not assign responsibility.

View original report
Concerns
3

Raised in this report

Recipients
4

Named on the report

Responses found
1

Of 4 recipients

Stated actions
1

Described in responses

Full report text

This is the full text from the original published report.

Open published report

Concerns and recipient responses

Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

Report evidence summary

Concerns raised3

  1. Continued use of unmodified lorry mounted cranes with crush injury risks
  2. Failure to ensure operators are aware of crush injury risks
  3. Failure to ensure operators are aware of available safety modifications

Stated actions An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.1

  1. Department for Transport

    Disseminate HSE’s safety notice on swing-up stabilisers to lorry operators once published.

Respondent positions A position is what a recipient says about a concern when it does not describe a specific action.2

  1. Department for Transport

    HSE is responsible for publishing the safety notice on swing-up stabilisers; the Office of the Traffic Commissioner will help distribute it.

    Redirects responsibilityThe respondent said that another organisation was responsible for deciding or taking action.
  2. Department for Transport

    The Department does not set requirements for stationary-use machinery, except where it may interfere with the vehicle’s safe operation.

    Outside remitThe respondent said that this matter was outside its role or authority.

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Continued use of unmodified lorry mounted cranes with crush injury risks

Wider context from the report

“(1) There are a large number of these lorry mounted cranes with such stabiliser beams and rotating legs in use by companies of all sizes and for a variety of uses within the industry (2) Whilst manufacturers have taken steps to modify the design of the stabiliser beams and rotating legs so as to ensure the risk of such crush injuries can be avoided in the future such modifications will only apply to new vehicles and those where the owner / operator of the vehicle becomes aware of possibility of modifications being available. (3) Vehicles without being modified will continue to be used throughout the industry and thereby such vehicles will continue to pose a risk of crush injuries occurring to the operator. (4) Action needs to be taken to disseminate the learning from this tragic incident throughout the industry so that operators of such vehicles are aware that safety modifications may be available for their vehicle and in any event operators need to be made aware of the risk of crushing so as to ensure safe operation at all times. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

No recurring-concern membership is currently published.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to ensure operators are aware of crush injury risks

Wider context from the report

“(1) There are a large number of these lorry mounted cranes with such stabiliser beams and rotating legs in use by companies of all sizes and for a variety of uses within the industry (2) Whilst manufacturers have taken steps to modify the design of the stabiliser beams and rotating legs so as to ensure the risk of such crush injuries can be avoided in the future such modifications will only apply to new vehicles and those where the owner / operator of the vehicle becomes aware of possibility of modifications being available. (3) Vehicles without being modified will continue to be used throughout the industry and thereby such vehicles will continue to pose a risk of crush injuries occurring to the operator. (4) Action needs to be taken to disseminate the learning from this tragic incident throughout the industry so that operators of such vehicles are aware that safety modifications may be available for their vehicle and in any event operators need to be made aware of the risk of crushing so as to ensure safe operation at all times. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

No recurring-concern membership is currently published.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to ensure operators are aware of available safety modifications

Wider context from the report

“(1) There are a large number of these lorry mounted cranes with such stabiliser beams and rotating legs in use by companies of all sizes and for a variety of uses within the industry (2) Whilst manufacturers have taken steps to modify the design of the stabiliser beams and rotating legs so as to ensure the risk of such crush injuries can be avoided in the future such modifications will only apply to new vehicles and those where the owner / operator of the vehicle becomes aware of possibility of modifications being available. (3) Vehicles without being modified will continue to be used throughout the industry and thereby such vehicles will continue to pose a risk of crush injuries occurring to the operator. (4) Action needs to be taken to disseminate the learning from this tragic incident throughout the industry so that operators of such vehicles are aware that safety modifications may be available for their vehicle and in any event operators need to be made aware of the risk of crushing so as to ensure safe operation at all times. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

No recurring-concern membership is currently published.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Disseminate HSE’s safety notice on swing-up stabilisers to lorry operators once published.

Verbatim wording from the response

“The Head of Traffic Commissioner Policy has been in contact with the Health and Safety Executive (HSE), who has informed them that the underlying harmonised standard has been reviewed and is being updated. HSE intends to publish a safety notice relating to swing-up stabilisers on their website. Once informed of HSE’s publication of the safety notice, the Office of the Traffic Commissioner will assist in providing this notice to lorry operators.”

Source location

Response from Department for Transport
Page 1 · response
Published 23 May 2023

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

HSE is responsible for publishing the safety notice on swing-up stabilisers; the Office of the Traffic Commissioner will help distribute it.

Verbatim wording from the response

“The Head of Traffic Commissioner Policy has been in contact with the Health and Safety Executive (HSE), who has informed them that the underlying harmonised standard has been reviewed and is being updated. HSE intends to publish a safety notice relating to swing-up stabilisers on their website. Once informed of HSE’s publication of the safety notice, the Office of the Traffic Commissioner will assist in providing this notice to lorry operators.”

Source location

Response from Department for Transport
Page 1 · response
Published 23 May 2023

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

The Department does not set requirements for stationary-use machinery, except where it may interfere with the vehicle’s safe operation.

Verbatim wording from the response

“The Department sets the requirements that vehicles must meet to ensure they can be driven safely on the roads. However, the Department does not set requirements for machinery which is primarily intended for use when the vehicle is stationary, other than to ensure it doesn’t interfere with the safe operation of the vehicle itself.”

Source location

Response from Department for Transport
Page 1 · response
Published 23 May 2023

Open published response
Back to top

Information checked against the published report and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Official responses located
1/4

Data last updated 7 September 2026