PFD report

Gary STARBUCK · Prevention of Future Deaths report

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

Issued 8 Apr 2026•Surrey

Report record

Published report and response evidence

This page connects the concerns raised in this report with statements found in recipients’ published responses. A link shows a clear evidence connection; it does not assign responsibility.

View original report
Concerns
1

Raised in this report

Recipients
2

Named on the report

Responses found
2

Of 2 recipients

Stated actions
6

Described in responses

Source document

Full report text

This is the full text from the original published report.

Open published report

Concerns and recipient responses

Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

Report evidence summary

Concerns raised1

  1. Lack of mandated care standards for privately treated patients
Responses linked to these concerns

Each statement is shown once, even when linked to more than one concern.

Actions described in response An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.3

  1. Action

    Develop rating characteristics clarifying expected standards of good care.

    Stated by Care Quality CommissionStated in progressThe respondent said that this action was in progress when they made their response on 13 April 2026.
  2. Action

    Publish the new assessment framework and associated guidance.

    Stated by Care Quality CommissionStated plannedThe respondent said that this action was planned when they made their response on 13 April 2026.
  3. Action

    Continue promoting College standards and guidance on safe surgical practice, multidisciplinary working and equivalent care standards across NHS and independent sectors.

    Stated by Royal College of Surgeons of EnglandStated in progressThe respondent said that this action was in progress when they made their response on 13 April 2026.

Respondent positions A position is what a recipient says about a concern when it does not describe a specific action.2

  1. Position

    Mandating private providers to follow NICE guidance is outside regulatory authority because NICE guidelines are generally not legally mandated.

    Stated by Care Quality CommissionOutside remitThe respondent said that this matter was outside its role or authority.

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Lack of mandated care standards for privately treated patients

Wider context from the report

“The Inquest heard evidence that Mr. Starbuck’s care and treatment for his skin cancers was initially provided privately. National guidance published by the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) sets out that any patient with a high risk Squamous Cell Carcinoma (SCC) should be referred to a specialist skin MDT (SSMDT.). Specifically, this is something which should have occurred following excision of a SCC. This is mandated practice within the NHS and the overwhelming evidence before me was that this applied to clinicians practicing in NHS. The situation in relation to patients being treated privately was less clear; evidence from several witnesses ranged from the position that this guidance was as binding on clinicians treating patients privately as in NHS, to the guidance was just that ‘guidance’ to be applied by the clinician within the framework of care being provided privately. The latter was relevant in the context of how clinicians treating patients privately would access the SSMDT. The evidence received was that normally this was via the treating clinician taking the patient to the relevant NHS SSMDT or in less frequent occasions where the Hospital had a private SSMDT to deal with patients being treated privately. No mandatory policy exists beyond the NICE guidance. As a consequence, whilst the policy is mandated for patients in receipt of NHS Care and Treatment, it is not mandatory for patients being treated for the same conditions privately. There are many clinicians who import the NICE Guidelines into their private practice, along with NHS Trusts who accept referrals from clinicians treating patients privately into the SSMDT for consideration. However, as this is not mandated practice for either clinicians or convenors of SSMDT’s, the consequence is that patients treated privately are at risk of receiving inferior care to those treated under the NHS, often within the same physical hospital setting. I am concerned that there is a lacuna in mandated care standards for patients treated privately by clinicians within the regulatory framework which gives rise to a risk of death. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

No recurring-concern membership is currently published.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Develop rating characteristics clarifying expected standards of good care.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Our current assessment framework and associated guidance is published on the internet and is available to providers and the public. The assessment framework is currently under review, and the new framework and guidance will also be publicly available. To ensure providers are clear about what good looks like rating characteristics are also being developed. We will continue to work with other stakeholders to raise awareness of our expectations in the independent sector.”

Source location

Response from Care Quality Commission
Page 1 · response
Published 13 April 2026

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Publish the new assessment framework and associated guidance.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Our current assessment framework and associated guidance is published on the internet and is available to providers and the public. The assessment framework is currently under review, and the new framework and guidance will also be publicly available. To ensure providers are clear about what good looks like rating characteristics are also being developed. We will continue to work with other stakeholders to raise awareness of our expectations in the independent sector.”

Source location

Response from Care Quality Commission
Page 1 · response
Published 13 April 2026

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Continue promoting College standards and guidance on safe surgical practice, multidisciplinary working and equivalent care standards across NHS and independent sectors.

Verbatim wording from the response

“The College will draw the findings of this Prevention of Future Deaths report to the attention of relevant professional networks and stakeholders within the independent healthcare sector, including organisations involved in clinical governance and quality assurance. We will also continue to promote existing College standards and guidance relating to safe surgical practice, multidisciplinary working and equivalent standards of care across sectors.”

Source location

Response from Royal College of Surgeons
Page 2 · response
Published 13 April 2026

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Mandating private providers to follow NICE guidance is outside regulatory authority because NICE guidelines are generally not legally mandated.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Your concerns relate specifically to guidance published by the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) not being mandated for use by private providers.”

Source location

Response from Care Quality Commission
Page 1 · response
Published 13 April 2026

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Regulatory arrangements for implementing NICE guidance in independent practice fall outside the College’s role as a non-statutory regulator.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Specifically, your report raises concerns regarding the variation in the implementation of NICE cancer pathway standards, including referral to specialist skin multidisciplinary teams (SSMDTs) between NHS and independent sector practice. The report also highlights broader questions regarding governance, accountability and the consistency of clinical standards across different healthcare settings.”

Source location

Response from Royal College of Surgeons
Page 1 · response
Published 13 April 2026

Open published response

Other statements in published responses

These actions and other statements could not be clearly connected to one concern in this report.

Recipient-stated actions An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.3

  1. 1

    Continue working with stakeholders to raise awareness of expectations in the independent sector.

    Stated by Care Quality CommissionStated in progressThe respondent said that this action was in progress when they made their response on 13 April 2026.
  2. 2

    Review the current assessment framework.

    Stated by Care Quality CommissionStated in progressThe respondent said that this action was in progress when they made their response on 13 April 2026.
  3. 3

    Share the report’s findings with relevant independent healthcare professional networks and governance and quality-assurance stakeholders.

    Stated by Royal College of Surgeons of EnglandStated plannedThe respondent said that this action was planned when they made their response on 13 April 2026.

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Continue working with stakeholders to raise awareness of expectations in the independent sector.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Our current assessment framework and associated guidance is published on the internet and is available to providers and the public. The assessment framework is currently under review, and the new framework and guidance will also be publicly available. To ensure providers are clear about what good looks like rating characteristics are also being developed. We will continue to work with other stakeholders to raise awareness of our expectations in the independent sector.”

Source location

Response from Care Quality Commission
Page 1 · response
Published 13 April 2026

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Review the current assessment framework.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Our current assessment framework and associated guidance is published on the internet and is available to providers and the public. The assessment framework is currently under review, and the new framework and guidance will also be publicly available. To ensure providers are clear about what good looks like rating characteristics are also being developed. We will continue to work with other stakeholders to raise awareness of our expectations in the independent sector.”

Source location

Response from Care Quality Commission
Page 1 · response
Published 13 April 2026

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Share the report’s findings with relevant independent healthcare professional networks and governance and quality-assurance stakeholders.

Verbatim wording from the response

“The College will draw the findings of this Prevention of Future Deaths report to the attention of relevant professional networks and stakeholders within the independent healthcare sector, including organisations involved in clinical governance and quality assurance. We will also continue to promote existing College standards and guidance relating to safe surgical practice, multidisciplinary working and equivalent standards of care across sectors.”

Source location

Response from Royal College of Surgeons
Page 2 · response
Published 13 April 2026

Open published response
Back to top

Information checked against the published report and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Official responses located
2/2

Data last updated 7 September 2026