Aston Soulsby · Prevention of Future Deaths report

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

Issued 22 Jun 2017•Black Country

Published report and response evidence

This report’s concerns and statements found in recipients’ published responses. Statements are included even where no link to an individual concern is recorded. A link shows an evidence connection; it does not assign responsibility.

View original report
Concerns
1

Raised in this report

Recipients
1

Named on the report

Responses found
1

Of 1 recipient

Stated actions
2

Described in responses

Recipients and published responses

Full report text

This is the full text from the original published report.

Open published report

Concerns and recipient responses

Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

Report evidence summary

Concerns raised1

  1. Unsafe use of hatched road areas by pedestrians and vehicles

Stated actions An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.2

  1. Sandwell Borough Council

    Consider installing a formalised pedestrian crossing on Crankhall Lane, assessing location suitability against pedestrian desire lines, access, parking, servicing and usability.

  2. Sandwell Borough Council

    Alter the existing carriageway markings and re-appropriate road space as necessary.

Respondent positions A position is what a recipient says about a concern when it does not describe a specific action.1

  1. Sandwell Borough Council

    Installing a formal crossing depends on identifying a suitable location that accommodates pedestrian movements, access, parking, servicing and usability.

    Unable to actThe respondent said that a constraint prevented them from taking the relevant action.

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Unsafe use of hatched road areas by pedestrians and vehicles

Wider context from the report

“1. Evidence emerged during the inquest that pedestrians frequently wait in the hatch area whilst crossing the road and vehicles also pass parked vehicles in the road in the hatched area. This may lead to confusion and pose a risk for pedestrians and motorists. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

No recurring-concern membership is currently published.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Consider installing a formalised pedestrian crossing on Crankhall Lane, assessing location suitability against pedestrian desire lines, access, parking, servicing and usability.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Nonetheless, it is accepted that it is not an ideal location for pedestrians to cross and as such to assist pedestrian movement, Sandwell MBC are considering the possibility of installing a formalised crossing point along this section of Crankhall Lane. It should be noted, however that this will be dependent upon a suitable location being identified with consideration given to desire lines, existing footway crossings, business accesses, parking bays, servicing to shops and usability.”

Source location

2017-0204-Response-by-Sandwell-Metrolitan-Borough-Council
Page 2 · response
Published 28 July 2017

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Alter the existing carriageway markings and re-appropriate road space as necessary.

Verbatim wording from the response

“In addition it has been noted the existing carriageway markings at this location are now considered to be an outdated layout and consequently these will be altered and road space re-appropriated as necessary.”

Source location

2017-0204-Response-by-Sandwell-Metrolitan-Borough-Council
Page 2 · response
Published 28 July 2017

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Installing a formal crossing depends on identifying a suitable location that accommodates pedestrian movements, access, parking, servicing and usability.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Nonetheless, it is accepted that it is not an ideal location for pedestrians to cross and as such to assist pedestrian movement, Sandwell MBC are considering the possibility of installing a formalised crossing point along this section of Crankhall Lane. It should be noted, however that this will be dependent upon a suitable location being identified with consideration given to desire lines, existing footway crossings, business accesses, parking bays, servicing to shops and usability.”

Source location

2017-0204-Response-by-Sandwell-Metrolitan-Borough-Council
Page 2 · response
Published 28 July 2017

Open published response
Back to top

Information checked against the published report and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Official responses located
1/1

Data last updated 7 September 2026