PFD report

Neil James STEWART · Prevention of Future Deaths report

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

Issued 25 Nov 2021•Newcastle upon Tyne

Report record

Published report and response evidence

This page connects the concerns raised in this report with statements found in recipients’ published responses. A link shows a clear evidence connection; it does not assign responsibility.

View original report
Concerns
4

Raised in this report

Recipients
1

Named on the report

Responses found
0

Of 1 recipient

Stated actions
0

Described in responses

Recipients and published responses

Source document

Full report text

This is the full text from the original published report.

Open published report

Concerns and recipient responses

Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

Concerns raised4

  1. Failure to provide guests with guidance on the applicable safety responsibilities
  2. Failure to provide venue-specific entertainment safety policies and warnings
    Part of recurring concern: Failure to tailor safety arrangements to individual entertainment events and venues
  3. Failure to document the division of safety responsibilities with another provider
    Part of recurring concern: Unclear accountability for health and safety controlsPart of recurring concern: Unclear allocation of safety responsibilities at organised public events
Responses linked to these concerns

Each statement is shown once, even when linked to more than one concern.

No linked response statements

No respondent-stated action or position is clearly linked to these concerns.

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to provide guests with guidance on the applicable safety responsibilities

Wider context from the report

“(3) When providing entertainment services in venue where another provider is responsible for organisation, safety of guests – discuss with the provider the details and clearly document the distinction in those responsibilities and give guidance to guests accordingly ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

No recurring-concern membership is currently published.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to provide venue-specific entertainment safety policies and warnings

Wider context from the report

“(2) Create/adopt a written policy/protocol for providing services (entertainment) at a venue that is associated with risks unique/specific to that venue which should include bespoke warnings/guidance to be given to clients who attend. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Failure to tailor safety arrangements to individual entertainment events and venues.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to document the division of safety responsibilities with another provider

Wider context from the report

“(3) When providing entertainment services in venue where another provider is responsible for organisation, safety of guests – discuss with the provider the details and clearly document the distinction in those responsibilities and give guidance to guests accordingly ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Unclear accountability for health and safety controls; Unclear allocation of safety responsibilities at organised public events.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Lack of a written safety policy covering guest protection, conduct expectations and event risks

Wider context from the report

“(1) Create and adopt a written safety policy/protocol in which you clearly document the steps you will put in place to protect your guests, your expectation of them and their conduct and a clear warning of the risks associated with the events they may attend ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Failure to reliably develop and review risk-reduction plans.

Open source report
Back to top

Information checked against the published report and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Data last updated 7 September 2026