PFD report

Ian Sidney Martin · Prevention of Future Deaths report

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

Issued 1 May 2014•North Yorkshire (West)

Report record

Published report and response evidence

This page connects the concerns raised in this report with statements found in recipients’ published responses. A link shows a clear evidence connection; it does not assign responsibility.

View original report
Concerns
2

Raised in this report

Recipients
2

Named on the report

Responses found
1

Of 2 recipients

Stated actions
0

Described in responses

Source document

Full report text

This is the full text from the original published report.

Open published report

Concerns and recipient responses

Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

Report evidence summary

Concerns raised2

  1. Poor lighting in the area of the bridge
    Part of recurring concern: Inadequate outdoor safety lighting
  2. Dangerous condition of steps leading from the canal bridge
Responses linked to these concerns

Each statement is shown once, even when linked to more than one concern.

Respondent positions A position is what a recipient says about a concern when it does not describe a specific action.1

  1. Position

    The Trust disputes that the steps were slippery or significantly worn, stating they were rough, in good condition and had little wear.

    Stated by Canal & River TrustDisputes the concernThe respondent disagreed with part of the concern or the basis for it.

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Poor lighting in the area of the bridge

Wider context from the report

“(2) The poor lighting in the area of the bridge. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Inadequate outdoor safety lighting.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Dangerous condition of steps leading from the canal bridge

Wider context from the report

“(1) The condition of the steps from the canal bridge leading to Gas Street, Skipton, presents a danger to those using the bridge. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

No recurring-concern membership is currently published.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

The Trust disputes that the steps were slippery or significantly worn, stating they were rough, in good condition and had little wear.

Verbatim wording from the response

“We note from the Regulation 28 Report that on the date of the accident in January it had been raining and that being evening it would have been dark. The report states that the steps were wet, slippery and worn. The Trust's Health and Safety Advisor and I have both separately inspected the steps and are able to confirm that the step surface is rough in finish giving no indication of being likely to be slippery when wet. The surface of the steps is good with little sign of wear despite the footbridge taking very heavy footfall being located adjacent to the bus station into Skipton. There is a handrail on one side of the steps. Photographs that were taken by the Safety Advisor at the time of his visit are attached for your information.”

Source location

2014-0196-Response-by-Canal-River-Trust
Page 1 · response
Published 1 May 2014

Open published response
Back to top

Information checked against the published report and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Official responses located
1/2

Data last updated 7 September 2026