PFD report

Gloria FOSTER · Prevention of Future Deaths report

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

Issued 10 Sep 2014•Surrey

Report record

Published report and response evidence

This page connects the concerns raised in this report with statements found in recipients’ published responses. A link shows a clear evidence connection; it does not assign responsibility.

View original report
Concerns
0

Raised in this report

Recipients
2

Named on the report

Responses found
1

Of 2 recipients

Stated actions
2

Described in responses

Source document

Full report text

This is the full text from the original published report.

Open published report

Concerns and recipient responses

Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

Report evidence summary

No concerns are currently included for this report.

Other statements in published responses

These actions and other statements could not be clearly connected to one concern in this report.

Recipient-stated actions An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.2

  1. 1

    Review how information from Regulation 28 reports and other sources is systematically incorporated into intelligent monitoring, inspection and registration processes.

    Stated by Care Quality CommissionStated in progressThe respondent said that this action was in progress when they made their response on 10 September 2014.
  2. 2

    Maintain guidelines requiring prompt notification of relevant agencies when urgently cancelling a provider’s registration, using telephone contact followed by written notice.

    Stated by Care Quality CommissionStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 10 September 2014.

Recipient positions A position is what a recipient says about a concern when they do not describe a specific action.2

  1. 1

    Local authorities and Clinical Commissioning Groups hold the primary duties and powers to ensure robust communication arrangements when care providers close.

    Stated by Care Quality CommissionRedirects responsibilityThe respondent said that another organisation was responsible for deciding or taking action.
  2. 2

    The statutory framework does not give CQC the duty or power to manage a closed provider’s communication lines as proposed.

    Stated by Care Quality CommissionOutside remitThe respondent said that this matter was outside its role or authority.

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Review how information from Regulation 28 reports and other sources is systematically incorporated into intelligent monitoring, inspection and registration processes.

Verbatim wording from the response

“We greatly value the intelligence provided in your report and intend to address the concern raised at paragraph 5(4) in particular. The CQC is currently also undertaking a detailed review designed to ensure that the valuable information provided by Regulation 28 reports, as well as from other sources of information, systematically and effectively into our intelligent monitoring, inspection and registration processes.”

Source location

2014-0399-Response-by-Care-Quality-Commission
Page 3 · response
Published 10 September 2014

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Maintain guidelines requiring prompt notification of relevant agencies when urgently cancelling a provider’s registration, using telephone contact followed by written notice.

Verbatim wording from the response

“The CQC does recognise the fundamental importance of notifying the relevant duty-holding agencies in circumstances where urgent cancellation is sought in order to avoid the possibility that circumstances such as those that led to the death of Ms Foster might arise. The CQC also recognises that such cooperation and notification is crucial. For that reason, the CQC has clear guidelines on who must be informed when we urgently cancel a provider’s registration. Those guidelines were in place at the time of Ms Foster’s death and were followed in this case. What follows is a copy of the guidance, which includes sets out as follows in particular at paragraph 11:”

Source location

2014-0399-Response-by-Care-Quality-Commission
Page 2 · response
Published 10 September 2014

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Local authorities and Clinical Commissioning Groups hold the primary duties and powers to ensure robust communication arrangements when care providers close.

Verbatim wording from the response

“The current statutory and regulatory framework does not confer on the CQC the duty or power to manage the lines of communication specifically in the way that you envisage. By contrast we understand that Local Authorities and Clinical Commissioning Groups (‘CCGs’) do have such primary duties and powers. Accordingly, those bodies are required to have sufficiently robust arrangements and procedures in place to ensure that they meet those duties without relying on third party agencies such as the CQC.”

Source location

2014-0399-Response-by-Care-Quality-Commission
Page 2 · response
Published 10 September 2014

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

The statutory framework does not give CQC the duty or power to manage a closed provider’s communication lines as proposed.

Verbatim wording from the response

“In drafting this response significant consideration and consultation has been given to your report by policy and operational teams. In particular we have considered what the current statutory framework empowers and obliges both the CQC and other relevant agencies to do in circumstances such as those that led to Mrs Foster’s tragic death.”

Source location

2014-0399-Response-by-Care-Quality-Commission
Page 2 · response
Published 10 September 2014

Open published response
Back to top

Information checked against the published report and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Official responses located
1/2

Data last updated 7 September 2026