PFD report

Nimo Younis · Prevention of Future Deaths report

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

Issued 20 Nov 2019•Inner North London

Report record

Published report and response evidence

This page connects the concerns raised in this report with statements found in recipients’ published responses. A link shows a clear evidence connection; it does not assign responsibility.

View original report
Concerns
8

Raised in this report

Recipients
2

Named on the report

Responses found
0

Of 2 recipients

Stated actions
0

Described in responses

Source document

Full report text

This is the full text from the original published report.

Open published report

Concerns and recipient responses

Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

Report evidence summary

Concerns raised8

  1. Lack of a practical ward plan for taking escalation action with available resources
  2. Lack of clarity between the MPS and trusts about required information and ensuing police action
  3. Lack of ward staff understanding of actions required to prompt police progression
    Part of recurring concern: Unclear healthcare and police responsibilities for safety-critical action
Responses linked to these concerns

Each statement is shown once, even when linked to more than one concern.

No linked response statements

No respondent-stated action or position is clearly linked to these concerns.

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Lack of a practical ward plan for taking escalation action with available resources

Wider context from the report

“3. C&I ward staff did not have a practical plan as to how to take that action with the resources at their disposal. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

No recurring-concern membership is currently published.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Lack of clarity between the MPS and trusts about required information and ensuing police action

Wider context from the report

“7. Whether or not there is agreement between the MPS and any trust about who should be doing what, there must be a clarity about what information the MPS needs in order to make the best decisions and what action the MPS will then take. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

No recurring-concern membership is currently published.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Lack of ward staff understanding of actions required to prompt police progression

Wider context from the report

“2. C&I ward staff did not have a proper understanding of what action the MPS required others to take in order to prompt the police to progress the matter further. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Unclear healthcare and police responsibilities for safety-critical action.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Lack of ward staff understanding of key information required by the MPS

Wider context from the report

“4. C&I ward staff did not have a proper understanding of what key information they needed to provide the MPS in order to trigger a police missing person enquiry, or to escalate an existing enquiry. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Unclear healthcare and police responsibilities for safety-critical action.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to promptly and fully utilise patients’ friends in missing-person searches

Wider context from the report

“5. C&I ward staff did not promptly or fully utilise the significant potential of their patient’s friends, who were ultimately the route by which Nimo Younis was found, and who would certainly have acted sooner if they had appreciated the lack of action being taken - whatever the reason for that lack of action. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Unreliable missing-person response.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Lack of ward staff understanding of MPS actions in response to absent-without-leave reports

Wider context from the report

“1. C&I ward staff did not have a proper understanding of what action the MPS would take in what circumstances, following the report of a patient absent without leave. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Unclear healthcare and police responsibilities for safety-critical action; Unreliable AWOL response processes.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to account for different organisational definitions of the same terms

Wider context from the report

“This needs to include a recognition that different organisations may have different definitions of the same terms. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

No recurring-concern membership is currently published.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to provide MPS decision makers with all information held by the MPS

Wider context from the report

“6. The MPS decision makers, particularly the night time duty inspector, did not have all the information that the MPS held when they were making decisions. Evidence was given that this was a resourcing issue on that particular night and of course it is difficult to legislate for that, but creative thinking may be utilised to address such an issue. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

No recurring-concern membership is currently published.

Open source report
Back to top

Information checked against the published report and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Official responses located
0/2

Data last updated 7 September 2026

No official response is included in the current published snapshot.