PFD report

Alan Richard LEE · Prevention of Future Deaths report

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

Issued 7 Jun 2024•West Sussex, Brighton and Hove

Report record

Published report and response evidence

This page connects the concerns raised in this report with statements found in recipients’ published responses. A link shows a clear evidence connection; it does not assign responsibility.

View original report
Concerns
2

Raised in this report

Recipients
3

Named on the report

Responses found
1

Of 3 recipients

Stated actions
7

Described in responses

Source document

Full report text

This is the full text from the original published report.

Open published report

Concerns and recipient responses

Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

Report evidence summary

Concerns raised2

  1. Failure to consider possible choking
    Part of recurring concern: Unsafe implementation of choking-risk prevention measures
  2. Failure to attempt life-saving techniques
    Part of recurring concern: Failure to reliably respond to patient breathing emergencies
Responses linked to these concerns

Each statement is shown once, even when linked to more than one concern.

Actions described in response An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.6

  1. Action

    Increase dysphagia and modified-diets e-learning refreshers to an annual frequency.

    Stated by Care Outlook LtdStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 7 June 2024.
  2. Action

    Purchase and use a choking vest for hands-on basic life support training.

    Stated by Care Outlook LtdStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 7 June 2024.
  3. Action

    Develop a lesson plan for practical choking recognition and response training using the choking vest.

    Stated by Care Outlook LtdStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 7 June 2024.

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to consider possible choking

Wider context from the report

“The issue of concern is that despite the fact that Mr Lee had recently been given his dinner and there was evidence that some or part of it had been consumed, the staff who attended, following Mr Lee using his alarm, did not appear to consider that he may have been choking. Therefore, no life saving techniques were attempted. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Unsafe implementation of choking-risk prevention measures.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to attempt life-saving techniques

Wider context from the report

“The issue of concern is that despite the fact that Mr Lee had recently been given his dinner and there was evidence that some or part of it had been consumed, the staff who attended, following Mr Lee using his alarm, did not appear to consider that he may have been choking. Therefore, no life saving techniques were attempted. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Failure to reliably respond to patient breathing emergencies.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Increase dysphagia and modified-diets e-learning refreshers to an annual frequency.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Increased frequency of e-learning | All staff complete e-learning on Dysphagia and Modified Diets as part of their Induction. This training has been set to an increased refresher frequency of annually.”

Source location

Response from Care Outlook
Page 4 · response
Published 7 June 2024

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Purchase and use a choking vest for hands-on basic life support training.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Action | Detail Purchase of a choking vest | The training team purchased a Choking Vest to incorporate into the practical BLS training we deliver.”

Source location

Response from Care Outlook
Page 3 · response
Published 7 June 2024

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Develop a lesson plan for practical choking recognition and response training using the choking vest.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Development of training plan | The training team developed a lesson plan for the delivery of the additional practical element of the choking training which can be delivered as a standalone session and can be incorporated into the existing BLS training session currently delivered during induction and refresher training.”

Source location

Response from Care Outlook
Page 3 · response
Published 7 June 2024

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Create and publish an online recorded choking-response training session with practical demonstrations for staff refreshers.

Verbatim wording from the response

“In addition, the training team are creating a recorded session with practical demonstrations using the choking vest which will be available to all staff across the business online and will be accessible at any time for refreshers via our e-learning platform. The recording has been completed and is now in the editing stages with the intention to have this live on the system before the end of August 2024.”

Source location

Response from Care Outlook
Page 4 · response
Published 7 June 2024

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Roll out standalone practical choking-response sessions using the choking vest across services.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Action | Detail Roll out of training with choking vest | The new practical session was rolled out to services as a standalone session beginning on 01/07/2024.”

Source location

Response from Care Outlook
Page 4 · response
Published 7 June 2024

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Provide amended choking-vest training through mandatory induction and refresher basic life support sessions.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Incorporation of choking vest training to induction and refresher | As noted above the lesson plan created by the training team can be delivered standalone or as part of the existing mandatory BLS training delivered during induction and refresher training.”

Source location

Response from Care Outlook
Page 4 · response
Published 7 June 2024

Open published response

Other statements in published responses

These actions and other statements could not be clearly connected to one concern in this report.

Recipient-stated actions An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.1

  1. 1

    Implement a standalone Eating and Drinking Checklist capturing choking risks, control measures and relevant healthcare-professional involvement across services.

    Stated by Care Outlook LtdStated in progressThe respondent said that this action was in progress when they made their response on 7 June 2024.

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Implement a standalone Eating and Drinking Checklist capturing choking risks, control measures and relevant healthcare-professional involvement across services.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Expansion on eating and drinking risk assessment”

Source location

Response from Care Outlook
Page 5 · response
Published 7 June 2024

Open published response
Back to top

Information checked against the published report and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Official responses located
1/3

Data last updated 7 September 2026