PFD report

Patrick Richard Steer · Prevention of Future Deaths report

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

Issued 23 Nov 2016•Manchester West

Report record

Published report and response evidence

This page connects the concerns raised in this report with statements found in recipients’ published responses. A link shows a clear evidence connection; it does not assign responsibility.

View original report
Concerns
1

Raised in this report

Recipients
1

Named on the report

Responses found
1

Of 1 recipient

Stated actions
4

Described in responses

Source document

Full report text

This is the full text from the original published report.

Open published report

Concerns and recipient responses

Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

Report evidence summary

Concerns raised1

  1. Failure of communication between specialist teams caring for patients under shared care
    Part of recurring concern: Unreliable inter-specialty communication for complex patient carePart of recurring concern: Unsafe coordination of shared care
Responses linked to these concerns

Each statement is shown once, even when linked to more than one concern.

Actions described in response An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.4

  1. Action

    Monitor the shared-care actions through the Quality and Safety Committee with updates every two months.

    Stated by Wrightington, Wigan and Leigh Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation TrustStated plannedThe respondent said that this action was planned when they made their response on 19 February 2017.
  2. Action

    Develop a shared-care guidance note reminding clinical staff of their communication responsibilities.

    Stated by Wrightington, Wigan and Leigh Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation TrustStated in progressThe respondent said that this action was in progress when they made their response on 19 February 2017.
  3. Action

    Discuss shared-care communication concerns at the Trust’s Clinical Advisory Board.

    Stated by Wrightington, Wigan and Leigh Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation TrustStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 19 February 2017.

Respondent positions A position is what a recipient says about a concern when it does not describe a specific action.3

  1. Position

    Daily reviews and documented management plans provided sufficient shared-care communication, so direct discussion was not indicated.

    Stated by Wrightington, Wigan and Leigh Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation TrustExisting arrangements considered sufficientThe respondent said that existing arrangements were sufficient, so no further action was needed.

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure of communication between specialist teams caring for patients under shared care

Wider context from the report

“I have concerns with regard to the following: i. That in circumstances where a patient is under the care of both the Surgical and Coronary Care teams, communication between the Doctors of those teams does not work well and could affect the treatment a patient receives which could lead to a future death. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Unreliable inter-specialty communication for complex patient care; Unsafe coordination of shared care.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Monitor the shared-care actions through the Quality and Safety Committee with updates every two months.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Continued Monitoring”

Source location

2016-0427-Response-by-Wrightington-Wigan-and-Leigh-NHS-Trust
Page 2 · response
Published 19 February 2017

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Develop a shared-care guidance note reminding clinical staff of their communication responsibilities.

Verbatim wording from the response

“However it is accepted that there are occasions when shared care is not as easy, particularly when important changes to a daily basis. This can be challenging in terms of communication between teams, and it is then crucial that teams agree some fundamental principles such as ceilings of care, and who communicates directly with the patient and families.”

Source location

2016-0427-Response-by-Wrightington-Wigan-and-Leigh-NHS-Trust
Page 2 · response
Published 19 February 2017

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Discuss shared-care communication concerns at the Trust’s Clinical Advisory Board.

Verbatim wording from the response

“The concerns you raised in respect of shared care were also discussed at the Trust’s Clinical Advisory Board (CAB) on 7 December 2016 by senior members of the Medical Directors and is attended by senior representatives from the various clinical areas.”

Source location

2016-0427-Response-by-Wrightington-Wigan-and-Leigh-NHS-Trust
Page 1 · response
Published 19 February 2017

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Distribute the approved shared-care guidance to clinical staff and upload it to the Trust’s policy library.

Verbatim wording from the response

“In that respect the ████████ Responsible Officer, ████████ was asked to draft a guidance note in respect of shared care that could be circulated within the Trust to remind clinical staff of their responsibilities. I enclose a draft guidance note that is being discussed at the next Clinical Advisory Board on 18 January 2017.”

Source location

2016-0427-Response-by-Wrightington-Wigan-and-Leigh-NHS-Trust
Page 2 · response
Published 19 February 2017

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Daily reviews and documented management plans provided sufficient shared-care communication, so direct discussion was not indicated.

Verbatim wording from the response

“I however confirmed that Mr Ster received daily reviews from both teams (surgical and cardiac), however no direct communication took place between the two teams. The documentation to indicate that either team had encountered any difficulties in attempting to communicate with the other. Both teams were able to review and comment on each others’ documented management plans.”

Source location

2016-0427-Response-by-Wrightington-Wigan-and-Leigh-NHS-Trust
Page 2 · response
Published 19 February 2017

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

The absence of direct communication between surgical and cardiology teams did not contribute to the deceased’s death.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Having reviewed the clinical records, ████████ is satisfied that the absence of direct communication between the two clinical teams did not contribute to the deceased’s demise; it appears that both teams were satisfied with each other’s management plans and documentation, and therefore there was no indication to have direct discussion.”

Source location

2016-0427-Response-by-Wrightington-Wigan-and-Leigh-NHS-Trust
Page 2 · response
Published 19 February 2017

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Much shared-care communication responsibility rests with clinicians’ obligations under the GMC’s Good Medical Practice guidance.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Following discussions at the Trust’s Clinical Advisory Board, it was agreed that much of the requirement for communication within shared care falls under the remit of the GMC’s (General Medical Council) Good Medical Practice which clinicians are required to adhere to. Under section 11, in respect of communication within and between the GMC states as follows:”

Source location

2016-0427-Response-by-Wrightington-Wigan-and-Leigh-NHS-Trust
Page 2 · response
Published 19 February 2017

Open published response
Back to top

Information checked against the published report and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Official responses located
1/1

Data last updated 7 September 2026