PFD report

Steffan Kuenzel · Prevention of Future Deaths report

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

Issued 29 Apr 2019•Inner North London

Report record

Published report and response evidence

This page connects the concerns raised in this report with statements found in recipients’ published responses. A link shows a clear evidence connection; it does not assign responsibility.

View original report
Concerns
2

Raised in this report

Recipients
1

Named on the report

Responses found
1

Of 1 recipient

Stated actions
1

Described in responses

Recipients and published responses

Source document

Full report text

This is the full text from the original published report.

Open published report

Concerns and recipient responses

Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

Report evidence summary

Concerns raised2

  1. Lack of specific advice for people independently reducing alcohol consumption
    Part of recurring concern: Unreliable alcohol detoxification care and support
  2. Failure to provide information about alcohol withdrawal signs and symptoms requiring urgent medical treatment
    Part of recurring concern: Unreliable recognition and response to alcohol withdrawal
Responses linked to these concerns

Each statement is shown once, even when linked to more than one concern.

No linked response statements

No respondent-stated action or position is clearly linked to these concerns.

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Lack of specific advice for people independently reducing alcohol consumption

Wider context from the report

“1) The decline in Mr Kuenzel’s health appears to coincide with the reduction from 750 ml vodka per day to 375 ml. Mr Kuenzel had attended hospital with alcohol withdrawal related seizures on a number of occasions. He was advised to gradually reduce his drinking but not given any specific advice as to how this should be done. Whilst alcohol reduction is most safely undertaken with the support of specialist agencies, there will be some people who present at hospital with serious alcohol withdrawal related problems that will not engage with services. Those individuals may develop withdrawal related problems through deciding to reduce their alcohol consumption independently. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Unreliable alcohol detoxification care and support.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to provide information about alcohol withdrawal signs and symptoms requiring urgent medical treatment

Wider context from the report

“2) The deterioration in Mr Kuenzel’s health from late October 2018 may be attributable to alcohol withdrawal. Mr Kuenzel and his partner knew that he needed to seek medical attention if he had a seizure but did not know of any other signs or symptoms of alcohol withdrawal which would require urgent medical treatment. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Unreliable recognition and response to alcohol withdrawal.

Open source report

Other statements in published responses

These actions and other statements could not be clearly connected to one concern in this report.

Recipient-stated actions An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.1

  1. 1

    Develop improved healthcare packages and information for patients with alcohol-related conditions.

    Stated by Barts Health NHS TrustStated in progressThe respondent said that this action was in progress when they made their response on 14 June 2019.

Recipient positions A position is what a recipient says about a concern when they do not describe a specific action.2

  1. 1

    A single emergency-department attendance within twelve months did not meet the existing threshold for a further alcohol-support referral.

    Stated by Barts Health NHS TrustExisting arrangements considered sufficientThe respondent said that existing arrangements were sufficient, so no further action was needed.
  2. 2

    Limited alcohol-team resources prevent support for every alcohol-related attendance; support is prioritised for patients admitted to hospital.

    Stated by Barts Health NHS TrustUnable to actThe respondent said that a constraint prevented them from taking the relevant action.

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Develop improved healthcare packages and information for patients with alcohol-related conditions.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Our public health consultant, Ian Bassnett is currently working on improved health care packages for our alcoholic patients-this follows successful packages for our smokers Mr Kunzel only had one attendance to ED in 12 months which would not have triggered a further referral .As above our public health team is looking at ways of offering more information to these patients but they are a difficult group with a very varied pattern of attendance and compliance On balance we could offer contact details of various agencies; how useful this would be at the time of presentation I am unsure. From the little of his GPs electronic notes I can see there is very little covering his addiction.”

Source location

2019-0002-Response-by-Barts-Health-NHS-Trust
Page 1 · response
Published 14 June 2019

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

A single emergency-department attendance within twelve months did not meet the existing threshold for a further alcohol-support referral.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Our public health consultant, Ian Bassnett is currently working on improved health care packages for our alcoholic patients-this follows successful packages for our smokers Mr Kunzel only had one attendance to ED in 12 months which would not have triggered a further referral .As above our public health team is looking at ways of offering more information to these patients but they are a difficult group with a very varied pattern of attendance and compliance On balance we could offer contact details of various agencies; how useful this would be at the time of presentation I am unsure. From the little of his GPs electronic notes I can see there is very little covering his addiction.”

Source location

2019-0002-Response-by-Barts-Health-NHS-Trust
Page 1 · response
Published 14 June 2019

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Limited alcohol-team resources prevent support for every alcohol-related attendance; support is prioritised for patients admitted to hospital.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Discussing with our ED department they thought it likely that it was noted from his past CRS record that he was under an alcohol reduction scheme in the community but it’s not documented if this was discussed with him. As he was intoxicated it may have been difficult to obtain a good history. We both agree that alcohol addiction is a serious public health issue ; we have many attendances each week with alcohol related conditions . Discussing with our alcohol team they have too little resource to provide support for every attendance and concentrate on those admitted to the hospital.”

Source location

2019-0002-Response-by-Barts-Health-NHS-Trust
Page 1 · response
Published 14 June 2019

Open published response
Back to top

Information checked against the published report and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Official responses located
1/1

Data last updated 7 September 2026