PFD report

Caroline Robey · Prevention of Future Deaths report

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

Issued 16 Oct 2015•Leicester City and South Leicestershire

Report record

Published report and response evidence

This page connects the concerns raised in this report with statements found in recipients’ published responses. A link shows a clear evidence connection; it does not assign responsibility.

View original report
Concerns
3

Raised in this report

Recipients
4

Named on the report

Responses found
3

Of 4 recipients

Stated actions
14

Described in responses

Source document

Full report text

This is the full text from the original published report.

Open published report

Concerns and recipient responses

Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

Report evidence summary

Concerns raised3

  1. Failure to use a sepsis screening tool in community healthcare
    Part of recurring concern: Failure to reliably recognise and respond promptly to sepsis
  2. Failure to recognise or adopt a UK sepsis clinical toolkit
    Part of recurring concern: Failure to reliably recognise and respond promptly to sepsis
  3. Failure to recognise repeated attendances as clinically significant
Responses linked to these concerns

Each statement is shown once, even when linked to more than one concern.

Actions described in response An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.7

  1. Action

    Re-issue sepsis patient safety alert guidance to LLR general practices, including access to adult, paediatric and infant screening and action tools.

    Stated by Central Nottinghamshire Clinical Services (CNCS and West Leicestershire Clinical Commissioning GroupStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 16 October 2015.
  2. Action

    Hold a meeting with University Hospitals of Leicester to share sepsis quality-improvement experience and materials and obtain implementation support.

    Stated by Central Nottinghamshire Clinical Services (CNCS and West Leicestershire Clinical Commissioning GroupStated plannedThe respondent said that this action was planned when they made their response on 16 October 2015.
  3. Action

    Develop an approved system for reviewing and implementing patient safety alerts, with subsequent assurance reporting to the Clinical Governance Committee.

    Stated by Central Nottinghamshire Clinical Services (CNCS and West Leicestershire Clinical Commissioning GroupStated plannedThe respondent said that this action was planned when they made their response on 16 October 2015.

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to use a sepsis screening tool in community healthcare

Wider context from the report

“1. No sepsis screening tool was being used by the community health care providers, and so opportunities were lost to consider a diagnosis of sepsis and refer as an emergency for hospital admission and treatment. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Failure to reliably recognise and respond promptly to sepsis.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to recognise or adopt a UK sepsis clinical toolkit

Wider context from the report

“2. A patient safety alert issued 2 September 2014 by NHS England clearly sets out resources available in the provision of a UK sepsis clinical tool kit, but this had not been recognised or adopted by the health care providers involved in this case. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Failure to reliably recognise and respond promptly to sepsis.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to recognise repeated attendances as clinically significant

Wider context from the report

“3. Inadequate note was taken of the number of different attendances Mrs Robey had initiated despite previous good health, and there was no suggestion she was a frequent attender or had ever sought medical assistance inappropriately. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

No recurring-concern membership is currently published.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Re-issue sepsis patient safety alert guidance to LLR general practices, including access to adult, paediatric and infant screening and action tools.

Verbatim wording from the response

“In addition, the CCG’s Head of Infection Control has arranged for an email to be circulated to all GPs within Leicester, Leicestershire and Rutland (LLR) entitled ‘Managing Sepsis’ as follows:”

Source location

ROBEY-Responses
Page 5 · response
Published 16 October 2015

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Hold a meeting with University Hospitals of Leicester to share sepsis quality-improvement experience and materials and obtain implementation support.

Verbatim wording from the response

“I can further confirm that a WLCCG Board GP, Dr Chris Barlow, has a meeting arranged with Dr John Parker, a Critical Care Consultant at the University Hospitals of Leicester (UHL), on 15 December 2015; UHL have successfully implemented a number of quality improvements projects for sepsis in UHL, they have offered to meet with the CCG with the aim of sharing their experience/materials and to provide support in ensuring that staff have a developed understanding of the management of sepsis.”

Source location

ROBEY-Responses
Page 5 · response
Published 16 October 2015

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Develop an approved system for reviewing and implementing patient safety alerts, with subsequent assurance reporting to the Clinical Governance Committee.

Verbatim wording from the response

“I would again refer you to the enclosed action plan developed by the Loughborough Urgent Care Centre. As you will note, an approved system to review and implement patient safety alerts at the Loughborough Urgent Care Centre will be developed by January 2016, with regular assurance reports subsequently provided to the Clinical Governance Committee at CNCS on the implementation of all relevant Patient Safety Alerts.”

Source location

ROBEY-Responses
Page 5 · response
Published 16 October 2015

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Implement the Sepsis 6 pathway at the Loughborough Urgent Care Centre.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Please see the enclosed action plan developed by the Loughborough Urgent Care Centre. As you will note, an organisational sepsis policy has been developed and during April and May 2015 all staff at the Loughborough Urgent Care Centre completed a training course in sepsis recognition. In addition, work is currently ongoing at the Loughborough Urgent Care Centre to implement the sepsis6 pathway.”

Source location

ROBEY-Responses
Page 4 · response
Published 16 October 2015

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Introduce updated adult and paediatric sepsis screening tools based on Sepsis 6 red flags and the NHS England safety alert.

Verbatim wording from the response

“In March 2015 EMAS introduced an updated sepsis screening tool (both adult and paediatric) based upon the Sepsis 6 red flags and NHS England Safety Alert (2014) (appendices 1a and 1b). Prior to this EMAS had in place a generic sepsis screening tool based upon the same features as the updated tool but did not have specific paediatric element included (appendix 2).”

Source location

ROBEY-Responses
Page 2 · response
Published 16 October 2015

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Develop, approve and implement a Local Operating Procedure for managing multiple attendances.

Verbatim wording from the response

“I would again refer you to the enclosed action plan developed by the Loughborough Urgent Care Centre. As you will note, a clinical newsletter was circulated in July 2015 to alert clinicians at the Loughborough Urgent Care Centre to key learning points from the case of Mrs Robey. In addition, the Loughborough Urgent Care Centre are in the process of developing a Local Operating Procedure for multiple attendances, which is to be approved and implemented by February 2016.”

Source location

ROBEY-Responses
Page 5 · response
Published 16 October 2015

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Highlight the importance of diagnosing sepsis and using the sepsis screening tool through the local medical committee.

Verbatim wording from the response

“NHS England has, through the local medical committee, highlighted the importance of diagnosing sepsis and the use of the sepsis screening tool (attached).”

Source location

Response from NHS England
Page 2 · response
Published 16 October 2015

Open published response

Other statements in published responses

These actions and other statements could not be clearly connected to one concern in this report.

Recipient-stated actions An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.7

  1. 1

    Deliver Paramedic Pathfinder triage training to clinical staff and extend face-to-face education to other qualified clinicians.

    Stated by East Midlands Ambulance Service NHS TrustStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 16 October 2015.
  2. 2

    Issue a clinical bulletin highlighting learning from the incident and other cases requiring improved sepsis management.

    Stated by East Midlands Ambulance Service NHS TrustStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 16 October 2015.
  3. 3

    Circulate a clinical newsletter alerting Loughborough Urgent Care Centre clinicians to key learning from the case.

    Stated by Central Nottinghamshire Clinical Services (CNCS and West Leicestershire Clinical Commissioning GroupStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 16 October 2015.
  4. 4

    Train all Loughborough Urgent Care Centre staff in sepsis recognition.

    Stated by Central Nottinghamshire Clinical Services (CNCS and West Leicestershire Clinical Commissioning GroupStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 16 October 2015.
  5. 5

    Arrange a Protected Learning Time event to raise sepsis awareness within primary medical care.

    Stated by Central Nottinghamshire Clinical Services (CNCS and West Leicestershire Clinical Commissioning GroupStated plannedThe respondent said that this action was planned when they made their response on 16 October 2015.
  6. 6

    Provide sepsis assessment and management education through the annual clinical education programme.

    Stated by East Midlands Ambulance Service NHS TrustStated in progressThe respondent said that this action was in progress when they made their response on 16 October 2015.
  7. 7

    Develop an organisational sepsis policy for the Loughborough Urgent Care Centre.

    Stated by Central Nottinghamshire Clinical Services (CNCS and West Leicestershire Clinical Commissioning GroupStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 16 October 2015.

Recipient positions A position is what a recipient says about a concern when they do not describe a specific action.2

  1. 1

    Review of Dr Khokar’s individual performance was assigned to the Professional & Practice Information Gathering Group.

    Stated by Central Nottinghamshire Clinical Services (CNCS and West Leicestershire Clinical Commissioning GroupRedirects responsibilityThe respondent said that another organisation was responsible for deciding or taking action.
  2. 2

    The matter concerning Foundation Year 2 GP Dr D Yousseff was referred to Health Education East Midlands.

    Stated by Central Nottinghamshire Clinical Services (CNCS and West Leicestershire Clinical Commissioning GroupRedirects responsibilityThe respondent said that another organisation was responsible for deciding or taking action.

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Deliver Paramedic Pathfinder triage training to clinical staff and extend face-to-face education to other qualified clinicians.

Verbatim wording from the response

“In addition to the Sepsis screening EMAS has in place the Paramedic Pathfinder Triage tool (PP). The PP Triage tool is a pre hospital assessment guide based around the widely used validated National Early Warning Score. This is an objective screening tool which is based upon both physiological parameters and clinical presentations to allow for safe and Treat care and also to ensure the early recognition of the sickest patients requiring Emergency Department admission. Since its introduction in April 2014 94% of staff have completed training. The application of this tool in this case would have required Emergency Department conveyance based upon the presenting symptoms. A copy of the PP tool can be found in appendix 3.”

Source location

ROBEY-Responses
Page 2 · response
Published 16 October 2015

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Issue a clinical bulletin highlighting learning from the incident and other cases requiring improved sepsis management.

Verbatim wording from the response

“As a part of our annual education programme for 2014/15 Sepsis assessment and management was included for all clinical staff and continued into the 2015/16 plan to allow for all staff to undertake this education. The educational material for this is found in appendix 4. In addition to educational material, awareness of staff has been promoted via clinical bulletin issued over the period of the last four years. Following this incident a further clinical bulletin has been issued to highlight the learning gained from this incident and other cases where Sepsis management could have been improved (appendix 5).”

Source location

ROBEY-Responses
Page 2 · response
Published 16 October 2015

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Circulate a clinical newsletter alerting Loughborough Urgent Care Centre clinicians to key learning from the case.

Verbatim wording from the response

“I would again refer you to the enclosed action plan developed by the Loughborough Urgent Care Centre. As you will note, a clinical newsletter was circulated in July 2015 to alert clinicians at the Loughborough Urgent Care Centre to key learning points from the case of Mrs Robey. In addition, the Loughborough Urgent Care Centre are in the process of developing a Local Operating Procedure for multiple attendances, which is to be approved and implemented by February 2016.”

Source location

ROBEY-Responses
Page 5 · response
Published 16 October 2015

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Train all Loughborough Urgent Care Centre staff in sepsis recognition.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Please see the enclosed action plan developed by the Loughborough Urgent Care Centre. As you will note, an organisational sepsis policy has been developed and during April and May 2015 all staff at the Loughborough Urgent Care Centre completed a training course in sepsis recognition. In addition, work is currently ongoing at the Loughborough Urgent Care Centre to implement the sepsis6 pathway.”

Source location

ROBEY-Responses
Page 4 · response
Published 16 October 2015

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Arrange a Protected Learning Time event to raise sepsis awareness within primary medical care.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Following the above meeting, a Protected Learning Time (PLT) event will subsequently be arranged to further raise awareness of sepsis within primary medical care.”

Source location

ROBEY-Responses
Page 5 · response
Published 16 October 2015

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Provide sepsis assessment and management education through the annual clinical education programme.

Verbatim wording from the response

“As a part of our annual education programme for 2014/15 Sepsis assessment and management was included for all clinical staff and continued into the 2015/16 plan to allow for all staff to undertake this education. The educational material for this is found in appendix 4. In addition to educational material, awareness of staff has been promoted via clinical bulletin issued over the period of the last four years. Following this incident a further clinical bulletin has been issued to highlight the learning gained from this incident and other cases where Sepsis management could have been improved (appendix 5).”

Source location

ROBEY-Responses
Page 2 · response
Published 16 October 2015

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Develop an organisational sepsis policy for the Loughborough Urgent Care Centre.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Please see the enclosed action plan developed by the Loughborough Urgent Care Centre. As you will note, an organisational sepsis policy has been developed and during April and May 2015 all staff at the Loughborough Urgent Care Centre completed a training course in sepsis recognition. In addition, work is currently ongoing at the Loughborough Urgent Care Centre to implement the sepsis6 pathway.”

Source location

ROBEY-Responses
Page 4 · response
Published 16 October 2015

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Review of Dr Khokar’s individual performance was assigned to the Professional & Practice Information Gathering Group.

Verbatim wording from the response

“It is my understanding that the CCG’s Chief Nurse has liaised with the Head of Quality at NHS England regarding the actions of the specific GPs involved in Mrs Robey’s care and has received assurances that Dr Khokar has been referred to their Professional & Practice Information Gathering Group (PIGG) to review their individual performance as a practitioner.”

Source location

ROBEY-Responses
Page 5 · response
Published 16 October 2015

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

The matter concerning Foundation Year 2 GP Dr D Yousseff was referred to Health Education East Midlands.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Dr D Yousseff has been confirmed as a Foundation Year 2 GP, and therefore this matter has been referred to Health Education East Midlands (HEEM).”

Source location

ROBEY-Responses
Page 6 · response
Published 16 October 2015

Open published response
Back to top

Information checked against the published report and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Official responses located
3/4

Data last updated 7 September 2026