Peter David Konitzer · Prevention of Future Deaths report

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

Issued 25 Mar 2025•Wiltshire and Swindon

Published report and response evidence

This report’s concerns and statements found in recipients’ published responses. Statements are included even where no link to an individual concern is recorded. A link shows an evidence connection; it does not assign responsibility.

View original report
Concerns
3

Raised in this report

Recipients
1

Named on the report

Responses found
1

Of 1 recipient

Stated actions
2

Described in responses

Recipients and published responses

Full report text

This is the full text from the original published report.

Open published report

Concerns and recipient responses

Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

Report evidence summary

Concerns raised3

  1. Failure to emphasise written risk assessments and method statements for construction work where no legal writing requirement applies
  2. Failure to guide volunteer-reliant organisations on obtaining professional advice and assistance when appropriate
    Part of recurring concern: Inadequate safety management of volunteer activities
  3. Inadequate standalone guidance on the obligations of charitable trusts and voluntary organisations
    Part of recurring concern: Inadequate safety management of volunteer activities

Stated actions An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.2

  1. Health and Safety Executive

    Consider the coroner’s recommendations when next reviewing the volunteering guidance pages.

  2. Health and Safety Executive

    Issue a copy of the prosecution press release through the main HSE ebulletin series.

Respondent positions A position is what a recipient says about a concern when it does not describe a specific action.1

  1. Health and Safety Executive

    HSE cannot specifically advise voluntary organisations to maintain written risk assessments where fewer than five employees because this would exceed legal requirements.

    Unable to actThe respondent said that a constraint prevented them from taking the relevant action.

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to emphasise written risk assessments and method statements for construction work where no legal writing requirement applies

Wider context from the report

“1. The HSE website has a section on Volunteering which provides links to more detailed sections elsewhere on the website. No where is it emphasised that as a matter of good practice before undertaking any construction work risk assessments and method statements should be in writing even when there is no legal requirement to do so. Many charitable trusts have a large number of volunteers working for them but with under 5 actual employees technically escape the legal requirements for such documents to be in writing. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

No recurring-concern membership is currently published.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to guide volunteer-reliant organisations on obtaining professional advice and assistance when appropriate

Wider context from the report

“3. Will thought be given to revising the Volunteering section of the website to provide a more comprehensive and standalone guide to the obligations of charitable trusts and voluntary organisations? Might such revision profitably include a section reminding organisations that rely on volunteers that enthusiasm should be tempered by being mindful of the need to obtain proper professional advice and assistance in appropriate circumstances? ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Inadequate safety management of volunteer activities.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Inadequate standalone guidance on the obligations of charitable trusts and voluntary organisations

Wider context from the report

“3. Will thought be given to revising the Volunteering section of the website to provide a more comprehensive and standalone guide to the obligations of charitable trusts and voluntary organisations? Might such revision profitably include a section reminding organisations that rely on volunteers that enthusiasm should be tempered by being mindful of the need to obtain proper professional advice and assistance in appropriate circumstances? ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Inadequate safety management of volunteer activities.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Consider the coroner’s recommendations when next reviewing the volunteering guidance pages.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Q3, Will thought be given to revising the volunteering section of the website to prove a more comprehensive and standalone guide to the obligations of charitable trusts and voluntary organisations? Might such revision probably include a section reminding organisations that rely on volunteers that enthusiasm should be tempered by being mindful of the need to obtain proper professional advice and assistance in appropriate circumstances?”

Source location

Response from HSE
Page 2 · response
Published 27 March 2025

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Issue a copy of the prosecution press release through the main HSE ebulletin series.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Q2. Subsequent to the conviction of the canal trust for breaches of health and safety legislation HSE published a bulletin. Will consideration be given to publishing a further bulletin following the findings of the inquest jury.”

Source location

Response from HSE
Page 2 · response
Published 27 March 2025

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

HSE cannot specifically advise voluntary organisations to maintain written risk assessments where fewer than five employees because this would exceed legal requirements.

Verbatim wording from the response

“The requirement to record the assessment if there are five or more employees comes after the requirement to assess the risks. Therefore, the requirement to adequately control risks arising from the work applies regardless of the number employed. The assessment of the risk is the means by which the necessary controls are identified rather than a control in and of itself.” HSE is not able to place guidance on its webpages that goes above and beyond the law, which would be the case if we specifically asked or advised voluntary organisations to have a written risk assessment, even if they did not have five or more employees.”

Source location

Response from HSE
Page 2 · response
Published 27 March 2025

Open published response
Back to top

Information checked against the published report and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Official responses located
1/1

Data last updated 7 September 2026