Donna Smith · Prevention of Future Deaths report

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

Issued 8 May 2024•Worcestershire

Published report and response evidence

This report’s concerns and statements found in recipients’ published responses. Statements are included even where no link to an individual concern is recorded. A link shows an evidence connection; it does not assign responsibility.

View original report
Concerns
2

Raised in this report

Recipients
2

Named on the report

Responses found
2

Of 2 recipients

Stated actions
3

Described in responses

Full report text

This is the full text from the original published report.

Open published report

Concerns and recipient responses

Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

Report evidence summary

Concerns raised2

  1. Failure to provide formal written guidance allocating responsibilities for urgent ambulance calls
    Part of recurring concern: Unreliable police access to safety-critical CCTV information
  2. Lack of formalised written governance of the relationship between CCTV operators and police

Stated actions An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.3

  1. West Mercia Police

    Implement the revised CCTV-to-police communication procedure, replacing Airwave contact with telephony and recording calls, triage decisions, attendance decisions and agency responsibility.

  2. West Mercia Police

    Keep the revised CCTV communication policy under review.

  3. Wychavon District Council

    Implement a CCTV incident-response process requiring operators to call 999, route serious incidents to appropriate emergency services, obtain reference numbers, and record police contact details.

Respondent positions A position is what a recipient says about a concern when it does not describe a specific action.3

  1. West Mercia Police

    The outlined procedure is considered robust enough to prevent similar incidents and is fully embedded within the Public Contact Centre.

    Existing arrangements considered sufficientThe respondent said that existing arrangements were sufficient, so no further action was needed.
  2. Wychavon District Council

    Police decide whether to attend once contacted, with the Most Appropriate Agency Policy then activated.

    Redirects responsibilityThe respondent said that another organisation was responsible for deciding or taking action.
  3. Wychavon District Council

    No further action is expected from CCTV control room operatives after making the call and recording the police contact record.

    No action considered necessaryThe respondent said that no further action was needed.

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to provide formal written guidance allocating responsibilities for urgent ambulance calls

Wider context from the report

“(1) I heard evidence at the inquest that there was at the time of these events, and there remains now, a complete lack of formalised written policies, procedures or guidance governing the relationship between those operating CCTV cameras in Worcestershire ( as Wychavon District Council do in respect of Worcester city centre CCTV cameras ) and West Mercia Police; (2) At the inquest I found as a matter of fact that the failure by either the CCTV operator or the police communications officer to call the ambulance service immediately after their call over Airwaves, and their lack of understanding over whose responsibility it was to make such a call, arose substantially because of this lack of formal written guidance; (3) Furthermore, I heard evidence that despite Ms. Smith’s death having occurred over 12 months ago, a draft Memorandum of Understanding between West Mercia Police and those operating CCTV cameras in Worcestershire had not yet been completed or formalised, but rather was still “being drawn up”. For all of the above reasons, I am concerned that unless action is taken to formalise the relationship between those operating CCTV cameras in Worcestershire and West Mercia Police, and to provide proper guidance setting out their respective responsibilities in situations such as this, there is a risk that other deaths may occur in the future. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Unreliable police access to safety-critical CCTV information.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Lack of formalised written governance of the relationship between CCTV operators and police

Wider context from the report

“(1) I heard evidence at the inquest that there was at the time of these events, and there remains now, a complete lack of formalised written policies, procedures or guidance governing the relationship between those operating CCTV cameras in Worcestershire ( as Wychavon District Council do in respect of Worcester city centre CCTV cameras ) and West Mercia Police; (2) At the inquest I found as a matter of fact that the failure by either the CCTV operator or the police communications officer to call the ambulance service immediately after their call over Airwaves, and their lack of understanding over whose responsibility it was to make such a call, arose substantially because of this lack of formal written guidance; (3) Furthermore, I heard evidence that despite Ms. Smith’s death having occurred over 12 months ago, a draft Memorandum of Understanding between West Mercia Police and those operating CCTV cameras in Worcestershire had not yet been completed or formalised, but rather was still “being drawn up”. For all of the above reasons, I am concerned that unless action is taken to formalise the relationship between those operating CCTV cameras in Worcestershire and West Mercia Police, and to provide proper guidance setting out their respective responsibilities in situations such as this, there is a risk that other deaths may occur in the future. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

No recurring-concern membership is currently published.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Implement the revised CCTV-to-police communication procedure, replacing Airwave contact with telephony and recording calls, triage decisions, attendance decisions and agency responsibility.

Verbatim wording from the response

“The incident was investigated separately by the IOPC, having been referred by West Mercia Police, resulting in a recommendation that a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) should be agreed between the Local Policing Area and Local Authority CCTV Centres. Part of the development of that MOU includes the withdrawal of Airwave Radio from CCTV rooms in recognition that this may not be the most appropriate way for them to communicate with West Mercia's Public Contact Centre. As a result of the removal of the ability for CCTV to contact the police via Airwaves, we now receive all contact from them via telephony. This allows for the automatic creation of a Contact Record on receipt of their call whereupon any decision around police attendance and the Most Appropriate Agency (MAA) Policy will follow the TRIAGE process.”

Source location

Response from West Mercia Police
Page 1 · response
Published 20 May 2024

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Keep the revised CCTV communication policy under review.

Verbatim wording from the response

“I am keen to ensure that all necessary action is taken to prevent other families from experiencing such tragic loss in similar circumstances and am assured that the procedure outlined above is robust enough to meet that aim and fully embedded within the Public Contact Centre. I do recognise that there may be a disadvantage with CCTV operators not having access to Airwave and I will keep the policy under review.”

Source location

Response from West Mercia Police
Page 2 · response
Published 20 May 2024

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Implement a CCTV incident-response process requiring operators to call 999, route serious incidents to appropriate emergency services, obtain reference numbers, and record police contact details.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Therefore, I have considered the letter sent by Alex Murray on behalf of West Mercia on 2 July and would put forward the following as the process to be followed by Wychavon District Council CCTV operators. This process has the aim to close the gap in communication between the agencies and reduce the likelihood of a similar situation happening again. In addition, it provides a means for a formal record to be set up by using the 999 communications channel following the removal of Airwave Radio from CCTV rooms in line with Police policy.”

Source location

2024-0264 - Response from Wychavon District Council
Page 1 · response
Published 20 May 2024

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

The outlined procedure is considered robust enough to prevent similar incidents and is fully embedded within the Public Contact Centre.

Verbatim wording from the response

“I am keen to ensure that all necessary action is taken to prevent other families from experiencing such tragic loss in similar circumstances and am assured that the procedure outlined above is robust enough to meet that aim and fully embedded within the Public Contact Centre. I do recognise that there may be a disadvantage with CCTV operators not having access to Airwave and I will keep the policy under review.”

Source location

Response from West Mercia Police
Page 2 · response
Published 20 May 2024

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Police decide whether to attend once contacted, with the Most Appropriate Agency Policy then activated.

Verbatim wording from the response

“When contact is made with the Police a Contact Record will automatically be created. At this point the police will make a decision around police attendance and the Most Appropriate Agency Policy will be activated. The CCTV operative is to record the details of the Contact Record for future reference on the existing incident record logs.”

Source location

2024-0264 - Response from Wychavon District Council
Page 2 · response
Published 20 May 2024

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

No further action is expected from CCTV control room operatives after making the call and recording the police contact record.

Verbatim wording from the response

“When contact is made with the Police a Contact Record will automatically be created. At this point the police will make a decision around police attendance and the Most Appropriate Agency Policy will be activated. The CCTV operative is to record the details of the Contact Record for future reference on the existing incident record logs.”

Source location

2024-0264 - Response from Wychavon District Council
Page 2 · response
Published 20 May 2024

Open published response
Back to top

Information checked against the published report and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Official responses located
2/2

Data last updated 7 September 2026