PFD report

Mrs Violet Cloudsdale · Prevention of Future Deaths report

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

Issued 25 Sep 2015•Cumbria

Report record

Published report and response evidence

This page connects the concerns raised in this report with statements found in recipients’ published responses. A link shows a clear evidence connection; it does not assign responsibility.

View original report
Concerns
3

Raised in this report

Recipients
2

Named on the report

Responses found
0

Of 2 recipients

Stated actions
0

Described in responses

Source document

Full report text

This is the full text from the original published report.

Open published report

Concerns and recipient responses

Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

Report evidence summary

Concerns raised3

  1. Lack of risk assessment for the general use of wheelchair lap-belts
    Part of recurring concern: Unreliable wheelchair fall-prevention controls
  2. Failure to identify the consent of wheelchair users or their families to lap-belt use
    Part of recurring concern: Unreliable wheelchair fall-prevention controls
  3. Unclear guidance on the lawful use of wheelchair lap-belts
    Part of recurring concern: Unreliable wheelchair fall-prevention controls
Responses linked to these concerns

Each statement is shown once, even when linked to more than one concern.

No linked response statements

No respondent-stated action or position is clearly linked to these concerns.

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Lack of risk assessment for the general use of wheelchair lap-belts

Wider context from the report

“(1) It was confirmed in evidence by ████████ that: a) Mrs Cloudsdale would have been less likely to have fallen if the lap-belt which was fitted to the wheelchair had been fastened; b) No risk assessment had been undertaken as to whether the lap-belt should generally have been utilised; c) No attempt had been made to identify whether Mrs Cloudsdale or her family would have indeed consented to the lap-belt being fastened to enhance her feeling of safety or security; d) There was a concern that utilising lap-belts may be construed as applying an unlawful restraint; e) Guidance on the use of lap-belts is unclear. A thorough review of your procedures with regard to the use of lap belts fitted to wheel chairs is required. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Unreliable wheelchair fall-prevention controls.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to identify the consent of wheelchair users or their families to lap-belt use

Wider context from the report

“(1) It was confirmed in evidence by ████████ that: a) Mrs Cloudsdale would have been less likely to have fallen if the lap-belt which was fitted to the wheelchair had been fastened; b) No risk assessment had been undertaken as to whether the lap-belt should generally have been utilised; c) No attempt had been made to identify whether Mrs Cloudsdale or her family would have indeed consented to the lap-belt being fastened to enhance her feeling of safety or security; d) There was a concern that utilising lap-belts may be construed as applying an unlawful restraint; e) Guidance on the use of lap-belts is unclear. A thorough review of your procedures with regard to the use of lap belts fitted to wheel chairs is required. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Unreliable wheelchair fall-prevention controls.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Unclear guidance on the lawful use of wheelchair lap-belts

Wider context from the report

“(1) It was confirmed in evidence by ████████ that: a) Mrs Cloudsdale would have been less likely to have fallen if the lap-belt which was fitted to the wheelchair had been fastened; b) No risk assessment had been undertaken as to whether the lap-belt should generally have been utilised; c) No attempt had been made to identify whether Mrs Cloudsdale or her family would have indeed consented to the lap-belt being fastened to enhance her feeling of safety or security; d) There was a concern that utilising lap-belts may be construed as applying an unlawful restraint; e) Guidance on the use of lap-belts is unclear. A thorough review of your procedures with regard to the use of lap belts fitted to wheel chairs is required. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Unreliable wheelchair fall-prevention controls.

Open source report
Back to top

Information checked against the published report and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Official responses located
0/2

Data last updated 7 September 2026

No official response is included in the current published snapshot.