PFD report

Michael John BURKE · Prevention of Future Deaths report

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

Issued 4 May 2024•Suffolk

Report record

Published report and response evidence

This page connects the concerns raised in this report with statements found in recipients’ published responses. A link shows a clear evidence connection; it does not assign responsibility.

View original report
Concerns
2

Raised in this report

Recipients
1

Named on the report

Responses found
1

Of 1 recipient

Stated actions
6

Described in responses

Source document

Full report text

This is the full text from the original published report.

Open published report

Concerns and recipient responses

Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

Report evidence summary

Concerns raised2

  1. Inadequate handover arrangements for outstanding falls assessments between shifts
    Part of recurring concern: Inadequate control of falls risksPart of recurring concern: Unreliable shift handover processes
  2. Inadequate arrangements for highlighting incomplete risk assessments
    Part of recurring concern: Inadequate control of falls risks
Responses linked to these concerns

Each statement is shown once, even when linked to more than one concern.

Actions described in response An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.5

  1. Action

    Apply a six-hour timeframe for completing falls risk assessments after admission or ward transfer.

    Stated by East Suffolk and North Essex NHS Foundation TrustStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 7 June 2024.
  2. Action

    Transition patient record keeping to an electronic system across the Trust by 2025.

    Stated by East Suffolk and North Essex NHS Foundation TrustStated plannedThe respondent said that this action was planned when they made their response on 7 June 2024.
  3. Action

    Audit falls documentation through weekly ward-manager checks and monthly Matron quality audits.

    Stated by East Suffolk and North Essex NHS Foundation TrustStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 7 June 2024.

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Inadequate handover arrangements for outstanding falls assessments between shifts

Wider context from the report

“The Court heard evidence that risk assessments were to be carried out regularly on patients in relation to their falls risk. This is particularly important in circumstances where a patient was being transferred between wards/units within the hospital and where the risk to the patient may change due to the change in environment. Mr. BURKE was such a risk from falling whilst on the ward and therefore arrangements were required to be put in place to manage this risk, informed by a risk assessment. He had been admitted to Ipswich Hospital on 26th January 2023 following an unimpressed fall at rehabilitation centre where he had been discharged to from Ipswich Hospital the previous day; 25th January 2023. Mr. BURKE was moved to a new ward on the 30th January 2023 following his admission, assessment and initial treatment. He was not risk assessed when transferred to the ward and the outstanding task to carry out the risk assessment had not been completed by the end of the shift during which he had been transferred onto the ward. This requirement was not handed over to the on-coming shift and a falls risk assessment had not been completed at the time Mr. BURKE sustained a fall on the ward. I am concerned that Ipswich Hospital has inadequate arrangements in place to both highlight circumstances where the requirement for risk assessments have not been completed and in the arrangements for the handover of tasks (particularly falls assessments) between shifts. I am further concerned that the failure to have adequate arrangements in place to address this raises a risk of future deaths which I am under a duty to bring to your attention. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Inadequate control of falls risks; Unreliable shift handover processes.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Inadequate arrangements for highlighting incomplete risk assessments

Wider context from the report

“The Court heard evidence that risk assessments were to be carried out regularly on patients in relation to their falls risk. This is particularly important in circumstances where a patient was being transferred between wards/units within the hospital and where the risk to the patient may change due to the change in environment. Mr. BURKE was such a risk from falling whilst on the ward and therefore arrangements were required to be put in place to manage this risk, informed by a risk assessment. He had been admitted to Ipswich Hospital on 26th January 2023 following an unimpressed fall at rehabilitation centre where he had been discharged to from Ipswich Hospital the previous day; 25th January 2023. Mr. BURKE was moved to a new ward on the 30th January 2023 following his admission, assessment and initial treatment. He was not risk assessed when transferred to the ward and the outstanding task to carry out the risk assessment had not been completed by the end of the shift during which he had been transferred onto the ward. This requirement was not handed over to the on-coming shift and a falls risk assessment had not been completed at the time Mr. BURKE sustained a fall on the ward. I am concerned that Ipswich Hospital has inadequate arrangements in place to both highlight circumstances where the requirement for risk assessments have not been completed and in the arrangements for the handover of tasks (particularly falls assessments) between shifts. I am further concerned that the failure to have adequate arrangements in place to address this raises a risk of future deaths which I am under a duty to bring to your attention. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Inadequate control of falls risks.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Apply a six-hour timeframe for completing falls risk assessments after admission or ward transfer.

Verbatim wording from the response

“For this reason East Suffolk and North Essex NHS Foundation Trust sets a 6 hour assessment timeframe, from admission to hospital or change of ward, for the assessment to be carried out, to make patients as safe as can be.”

Source location

Response from East Suffolk and North Essex NHS Foundation Trust
Page 2 · response
Published 7 June 2024

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Transition patient record keeping to an electronic system across the Trust by 2025.

Verbatim wording from the response

“The Trust has recently signed a contract to transition their patient records system to an electronic system, meaning that by 2025, all ESNEFT patient record keeping will be done electronically.”

Source location

Response from East Suffolk and North Essex NHS Foundation Trust
Page 3 · response
Published 7 June 2024

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Audit falls documentation through weekly ward-manager checks and monthly Matron quality audits.

Verbatim wording from the response

“As part of the Trust’s accountability framework, patient notes are audited frequently to ensure that they are being completed correctly and to identify any issues with compliance in completing notes.”

Source location

Response from East Suffolk and North Essex NHS Foundation Trust
Page 2 · response
Published 7 June 2024

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Update the Falls Prevention Policy to require moving-and-handling assessments and Falls Prevention Integrated Care Pathways within six hours of admission or ward transfer.

Verbatim wording from the response

“As part of the ongoing review process of our policies, the Trust has reviewed and updated their Falls Prevention Policy, which provides staff with guidance on the need to complete a moving and handling assessment and Falls Prevention Integrated Care Pathway within 6 hours of a decision to admit or transfer wards. This policy will be signed off at the Patient Safety Group on 18 June 2024.”

Source location

Response from East Suffolk and North Essex NHS Foundation Trust
Page 2 · response
Published 7 June 2024

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Amend the Integrated Patient Record with an updated falls risk assessment proforma specifying the six-hour completion requirement.

Verbatim wording from the response

“The Trust has also carried out a review of the Integrated Patient Record, which forms an appendix to the Falls Prevention Policy, has been amended and now includes an updated Falls risk assessment proforma, which highlights the need for the assessment to be completed within the 6 hour time period of admission/change of ward.”

Source location

Response from East Suffolk and North Essex NHS Foundation Trust
Page 2 · response
Published 7 June 2024

Open published response

Other statements in published responses

These actions and other statements could not be clearly connected to one concern in this report.

Recipient-stated actions An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.1

  1. 1

    Use Care Gap Analysis and After Action Review processes for falls to identify themes, trends, learning and training needs.

    Stated by East Suffolk and North Essex NHS Foundation TrustStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 7 June 2024.

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Use Care Gap Analysis and After Action Review processes for falls to identify themes, trends, learning and training needs.

Verbatim wording from the response

“The Trust have implemented a Care Gap Analysis and After Action Review process for falls. The Care Gap Analysis will generate themes and trends with falls to help support change.”

Source location

Response from East Suffolk and North Essex NHS Foundation Trust
Page 3 · response
Published 7 June 2024

Open published response
Back to top

Information checked against the published report and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Official responses located
1/1

Data last updated 7 September 2026