Christine Rita Booker · Prevention of Future Deaths report

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

Issued 28 May 2024•Dorset

Published report and response evidence

This report’s concerns and statements found in recipients’ published responses. Statements are included even where no link to an individual concern is recorded. A link shows an evidence connection; it does not assign responsibility.

View original report
Concerns
2

Raised in this report

Recipients
1

Named on the report

Responses found
2

Of 1 recipient

Stated actions
5

Described in responses

Full report text

This is the full text from the original published report.

Open published report

Concerns and recipient responses

Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

Report evidence summary

Concerns raised2

  1. Unavailability of out-of-hours interventional radiology at Dorset County Hospital
    Part of recurring concern: Unreliable out-of-hours interventional radiology support
  2. Delays in urgent interventional radiology treatment caused by required inter-hospital transfer

Stated actions An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.5

  1. Dorset County Hospital NHS Foundation Trust

    Continue monitoring the service, clinical decision-making and access to services for current and future patients.

  2. Dorset County Hospital NHS Foundation Trust

    Audit interventional radiology transfer times and compliance with decision-to-transfer standards with University Hospitals Dorset.

  3. Dorset County Hospital NHS Foundation Trust

    Review the inquest findings and Preventing Future Deaths recommendations.

  4. NHS England

    Share learning and insights from Prevention of Future Deaths reports across NHS England nationally and regionally.

  5. NHS England

    Discuss all Prevention of Future Deaths reports through the Regulation 28 Working Group.

Respondent positions A position is what a recipient says about a concern when it does not describe a specific action.6

  1. Dorset County Hospital NHS Foundation Trust

    NHS England, as commissioner, is responsible for addressing the provision of 24/7 emergency specialist interventional radiology.

    Redirects responsibilityThe respondent said that another organisation was responsible for deciding or taking action.
  2. Dorset County Hospital NHS Foundation Trust

    The commissioned blue-light transfer pathway and monitoring mechanisms provide assurance of timely and safe access to emergency interventional radiology.

    Existing arrangements considered sufficientThe respondent said that existing arrangements were sufficient, so no further action was needed.
  3. NHS England

    A full interventional radiology service at Dorset County Hospital is considered likely unsustainable, limiting expansion of local provision.

    Unable to actThe respondent said that a constraint prevented them from taking the relevant action.
  4. NHS England

    The established hub-and-spoke vascular model and private-provider transfer pathways are considered sufficient for Dorset patients requiring vascular intervention.

    Existing arrangements considered sufficientThe respondent said that existing arrangements were sufficient, so no further action was needed.
  5. NHS England

    Further comment on Christine’s care and transfer is unavailable because it is unclear whether the hip replacement was NHS commissioned and funded.

    Unable to actThe respondent said that a constraint prevented them from taking the relevant action.
  6. NHS England

    The circumstances of Christine’s death and related concerns are considered more appropriate for the relevant hospital trusts to address.

    Redirects responsibilityThe respondent said that another organisation was responsible for deciding or taking action.

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Unavailability of out-of-hours interventional radiology at Dorset County Hospital

Wider context from the report

“1. During the inquest evidence was heard that: i. There is no out of hours interventional radiology at Dorset County Hospital and that patients requiring this potentially urgent and life-saving intervention that live in the West of the County require transfer to the Royal Bournemouth Hospital for treatment. 2. I have concerns with regard to the following: i. Because of the lack of out of hours interventional radiology at Dorset County Hospital, patients in the West of the County requiring such an intervention must be transferred to the Royal Bournemouth Hospital. This exposes these patients to a potentially considerable and significant delay in the provision of urgent and life-saving treatment, which, in turn, exposes them to an increased risk of death. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Unreliable out-of-hours interventional radiology support.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Delays in urgent interventional radiology treatment caused by required inter-hospital transfer

Wider context from the report

“1. During the inquest evidence was heard that: i. There is no out of hours interventional radiology at Dorset County Hospital and that patients requiring this potentially urgent and life-saving intervention that live in the West of the County require transfer to the Royal Bournemouth Hospital for treatment. 2. I have concerns with regard to the following: i. Because of the lack of out of hours interventional radiology at Dorset County Hospital, patients in the West of the County requiring such an intervention must be transferred to the Royal Bournemouth Hospital. This exposes these patients to a potentially considerable and significant delay in the provision of urgent and life-saving treatment, which, in turn, exposes them to an increased risk of death. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

No recurring-concern membership is currently published.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Continue monitoring the service, clinical decision-making and access to services for current and future patients.

Verbatim wording from the response

“The Trust is committed to continuous learning from any incident to strengthen the services for which it is responsible. Therefore we are carrying out an investigation of the management of this case as it pertains to Dorset County Hospital and will request sight of the report from the Winterborne Circle Hospital. In conjunction with UHD we are auditing the transfer times for interventional radiology between the two sites and our compliance with ‘decision to transfer’ standards. We will continue to monitor the service to ensure our clinical decision making and access to services are in place for all current and future patients.”

Source location

Response from Dorset County Hospital
Page 2 · response
Published 31 May 2024

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Audit interventional radiology transfer times and compliance with decision-to-transfer standards with University Hospitals Dorset.

Verbatim wording from the response

“The Trust is committed to continuous learning from any incident to strengthen the services for which it is responsible. Therefore we are carrying out an investigation of the management of this case as it pertains to Dorset County Hospital and will request sight of the report from the Winterborne Circle Hospital. In conjunction with UHD we are auditing the transfer times for interventional radiology between the two sites and our compliance with ‘decision to transfer’ standards. We will continue to monitor the service to ensure our clinical decision making and access to services are in place for all current and future patients.”

Source location

Response from Dorset County Hospital
Page 2 · response
Published 31 May 2024

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Review the inquest findings and Preventing Future Deaths recommendations.

Verbatim wording from the response

“The Trust is committed to continuous learning from any incident to strengthen the services for which it is responsible. Therefore we are carrying out an investigation of the management of this case as it pertains to Dorset County Hospital and will request sight of the report from the Winterborne Circle Hospital. In conjunction with UHD we are auditing the transfer times for interventional radiology between the two sites and our compliance with ‘decision to transfer’ standards. We will continue to monitor the service to ensure our clinical decision making and access to services are in place for all current and future patients.”

Source location

Response from Dorset County Hospital
Page 2 · response
Published 31 May 2024

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Share learning and insights from Prevention of Future Deaths reports across NHS England nationally and regionally.

Verbatim wording from the response

“I would also like to provide further assurances on the national NHS England work taking place around the Reports to Prevent Future Deaths. All reports received are discussed by the Regulation 28 Working Group, comprising Regional Medical Directors, and other clinical and quality colleagues from across the regions. This ensures that key learnings and insights around events, such as the sad death of Christine, are shared across the NHS at both a national and regional level and helps us to pay close attention to any emerging trends that may require further review and action.”

Source location

Response from NHS England
Page 2 · response
Published 31 May 2024

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Discuss all Prevention of Future Deaths reports through the Regulation 28 Working Group.

Verbatim wording from the response

“I would also like to provide further assurances on the national NHS England work taking place around the Reports to Prevent Future Deaths. All reports received are discussed by the Regulation 28 Working Group, comprising Regional Medical Directors, and other clinical and quality colleagues from across the regions. This ensures that key learnings and insights around events, such as the sad death of Christine, are shared across the NHS at both a national and regional level and helps us to pay close attention to any emerging trends that may require further review and action.”

Source location

Response from NHS England
Page 2 · response
Published 31 May 2024

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

NHS England, as commissioner, is responsible for addressing the provision of 24/7 emergency specialist interventional radiology.

Verbatim wording from the response

“We have reviewed the findings of the inquest, and the recommendations as stated in the Preventing Future Deaths report and can confirm that the Trust does not provide a 24/7 emergency service for specialist interventional radiology for embolization. This is a specialised service commissioned by NHS England, provided by University Hospitals Dorset from their site at the Royal Bournemouth Hospital for both Dorset County Hospital and Salisbury Hospital. 24/7 specialised interventional radiology services are not available in every local hospital because they are delivered by specialist teams who have the necessary skills, experience and volume of work to maintain safe standards of care across wider geographical areas.”

Source location

Response from Dorset County Hospital
Page 1 · response
Published 31 May 2024

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

The commissioned blue-light transfer pathway and monitoring mechanisms provide assurance of timely and safe access to emergency interventional radiology.

Verbatim wording from the response

“The commissioned pathway of care, for those requiring emergency specialist interventional radiology who attend Dorset County Hospital, is for ‘blue light transfer’ to the Royal Bournemouth Hospital, or other tertiary centre, via the ambulance service or in time critical situations by helicopter.”

Source location

Response from Dorset County Hospital
Page 1 · response
Published 31 May 2024

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

A full interventional radiology service at Dorset County Hospital is considered likely unsustainable, limiting expansion of local provision.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Dorset Integrated Care Board advise that there is a well-practiced hub and spoke model with the Royal Bournemouth Hospital for vascular services, as well as clear pathways for private provider transfer. They advise that a full interventional radiology service at Dorset County Hospital would likely be unsustainable.”

Source location

Response from NHS England
Page 2 · response
Published 31 May 2024

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

The established hub-and-spoke vascular model and private-provider transfer pathways are considered sufficient for Dorset patients requiring vascular intervention.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Dorset Integrated Care Board advise that there is a well-practiced hub and spoke model with the Royal Bournemouth Hospital for vascular services, as well as clear pathways for private provider transfer. They advise that a full interventional radiology service at Dorset County Hospital would likely be unsustainable.”

Source location

Response from NHS England
Page 2 · response
Published 31 May 2024

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Further comment on Christine’s care and transfer is unavailable because it is unclear whether the hip replacement was NHS commissioned and funded.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Based on the information provided in your Report, NHS England is unable to provide further comment on the care provided to Christine following her procedure, and her transfer to Royal Bournemouth Hospital. It is not clear to NHS England whether the hip replacement procedure had been commissioned and funded by the NHS.”

Source location

Response from NHS England
Page 1 · response
Published 31 May 2024

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

The circumstances of Christine’s death and related concerns are considered more appropriate for the relevant hospital trusts to address.

Verbatim wording from the response

“NHS England continues to seek further details on the issues surrounding Christine’s care and the matters raised in your Report from colleagues in the South West. We are happy to update the Coroner on the information received in due course. However, we remain of the view that the concerns raised by the Coroner in respect of the circumstances of Christine’s death are more appropriate for the Trusts to address.”

Source location

Response from NHS England
Page 2 · response
Published 31 May 2024

Open published response
Back to top

Information checked against the published report and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Official responses located
2/1

Data last updated 7 September 2026