PFD report

Ernest Smith · Prevention of Future Deaths report

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

Issued 14 Mar 2024•Essex

Report record

Published report and response evidence

This page connects the concerns raised in this report with statements found in recipients’ published responses. A link shows a clear evidence connection; it does not assign responsibility.

View original report
Concerns
4

Raised in this report

Recipients
1

Named on the report

Responses found
1

Of 1 recipient

Stated actions
7

Described in responses

Source document

Full report text

This is the full text from the original published report.

Open published report

Concerns and recipient responses

Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

Report evidence summary

Concerns raised4

  1. Delays in medical review of acute clinical deterioration
    Part of recurring concern: Failure to conduct timely, appropriate clinical assessmentsPart of recurring concern: Failure to reliably recognise and respond to acute clinical deterioration
  2. Failure to follow the Sepsis Protocol
    Part of recurring concern: Failure to reliably recognise and respond promptly to sepsis
  3. Delays in commencing antibiotics for infected haematoma
    Part of recurring concern: Failure to provide timely antibiotic treatment for suspected or confirmed infection
Responses linked to these concerns

Each statement is shown once, even when linked to more than one concern.

Actions described in response An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.6

  1. Action

    Provide out-of-hours patient-care coordination through a dedicated Hospital at Night team.

    Stated by The TrustStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 20 March 2024.
  2. Action

    Work towards 100% compliance with Sepsis training across all clinical areas.

    Stated by The TrustStated in progressThe respondent said that this action was in progress when they made their response on 20 March 2024.
  3. Action

    Work towards including Sepsis training in mandatory training for clinical staff, with later extension to non-clinical staff.

    Stated by The TrustStated in progressThe respondent said that this action was in progress when they made their response on 20 March 2024.

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Delays in medical review of acute clinical deterioration

Wider context from the report

“a. Medical review requested on 10 March by nurses due to concerns about the acute development of bilateral bruising on Mr Smith's legs. This request was chased by nurses on 11 March and was not conducted until the evening of 12 March. b. A further medical review was conducted in the early hours of 13 March as Mr Smith was in pain and had developed a leg haematoma. c. It took 3 days for consultant review of Mr Smith. On 13 March Mr Smith was reviewed by a consultant from another ward and prophylactic anticoagulation was discontinued. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Failure to conduct timely, appropriate clinical assessments; Failure to reliably recognise and respond to acute clinical deterioration.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to follow the Sepsis Protocol

Wider context from the report

“d. Mr Smith was medically reviewed and considered fit for discharge on 30 March. A tissue viability nurse review that day noted an infected leg haematoma and recommended a surgical referral for consideration of washout and debridement. e. Antibiotics for the infected haematoma were not commenced until 3 April. f. Sepsis was highlighted by the Trust surgical team on 3 April and the Sepsis Protocol was not followed. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Failure to reliably recognise and respond promptly to sepsis.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Delays in commencing antibiotics for infected haematoma

Wider context from the report

“d. Mr Smith was medically reviewed and considered fit for discharge on 30 March. A tissue viability nurse review that day noted an infected leg haematoma and recommended a surgical referral for consideration of washout and debridement. e. Antibiotics for the infected haematoma were not commenced until 3 April. f. Sepsis was highlighted by the Trust surgical team on 3 April and the Sepsis Protocol was not followed. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Failure to provide timely antibiotic treatment for suspected or confirmed infection.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Delays in consultant review

Wider context from the report

“a. Medical review requested on 10 March by nurses due to concerns about the acute development of bilateral bruising on Mr Smith's legs. This request was chased by nurses on 11 March and was not conducted until the evening of 12 March. b. A further medical review was conducted in the early hours of 13 March as Mr Smith was in pain and had developed a leg haematoma. c. It took 3 days for consultant review of Mr Smith. On 13 March Mr Smith was reviewed by a consultant from another ward and prophylactic anticoagulation was discontinued. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Delays in consultant review of patients; Failure to conduct timely, appropriate clinical assessments.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Provide out-of-hours patient-care coordination through a dedicated Hospital at Night team.

Verbatim wording from the response

“outstanding ‘tasks’ relating to patients are now articulated between day and night teams during the clinical handover of patients using this list. Coordination for the care of patients out of hours is the responsibility of a dedicated Hospital at Night team.”

Source location

Response from Princess Alexandra Hospital
Page 2 · response
Published 20 March 2024

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Work towards 100% compliance with Sepsis training across all clinical areas.

Verbatim wording from the response

“We agree that we did not implement ‘Sepsis 6’ formally in Mr Smith’s case. Since his episode of care, we have taken steps to improve the management of Sepsis at the Trust. We have been successful in recruitment into a Sepsis Lead Nurse position. This role includes ensuring Trust-wide compliance with the Sepsis 6 protocol. She is currently working towards ensuring 100% compliance to Sepsis training in all our clinical areas, and the inclusion of Sepsis training as part of our mandatory training programme for all clinical staff, to be extended in due course to non-clinical staff.”

Source location

Response from Princess Alexandra Hospital
Page 2 · response
Published 20 March 2024

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Work towards including Sepsis training in mandatory training for clinical staff, with later extension to non-clinical staff.

Verbatim wording from the response

“We agree that we did not implement ‘Sepsis 6’ formally in Mr Smith’s case. Since his episode of care, we have taken steps to improve the management of Sepsis at the Trust. We have been successful in recruitment into a Sepsis Lead Nurse position. This role includes ensuring Trust-wide compliance with the Sepsis 6 protocol. She is currently working towards ensuring 100% compliance to Sepsis training in all our clinical areas, and the inclusion of Sepsis training as part of our mandatory training programme for all clinical staff, to be extended in due course to non-clinical staff.”

Source location

Response from Princess Alexandra Hospital
Page 2 · response
Published 20 March 2024

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Continue cyclical Sepsis audits and improvement programmes.

Verbatim wording from the response

“We have also implemented a Sepsis awareness programme, part of which included a Sepsis Awareness Day on 21st March 2024 which was well very attended by staff. We remain committed to cyclical audits and improvement programmes relating to Sepsis.”

Source location

Response from Princess Alexandra Hospital
Page 2 · response
Published 20 March 2024

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Use Nervcentre task lists to communicate outstanding patient tasks between day and night teams during clinical handover.

Verbatim wording from the response

“We agree that there was a delay in conducting a medical review for Mr Smith from Friday 10th until Sunday 12th March. Since Mr Smith’s admission, the doctors on call now have an additional formal ‘tasks’ list using an established software tool called Nervcentre. All”

Source location

Response from Princess Alexandra Hospital
Page 1 · response
Published 20 March 2024

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Recruit a Sepsis Lead Nurse responsible for Trust-wide compliance with the Sepsis 6 protocol.

Verbatim wording from the response

“We agree that we did not implement ‘Sepsis 6’ formally in Mr Smith’s case. Since his episode of care, we have taken steps to improve the management of Sepsis at the Trust. We have been successful in recruitment into a Sepsis Lead Nurse position. This role includes ensuring Trust-wide compliance with the Sepsis 6 protocol. She is currently working towards ensuring 100% compliance to Sepsis training in all our clinical areas, and the inclusion of Sepsis training as part of our mandatory training programme for all clinical staff, to be extended in due course to non-clinical staff.”

Source location

Response from Princess Alexandra Hospital
Page 2 · response
Published 20 March 2024

Open published response

Other statements in published responses

These actions and other statements could not be clearly connected to one concern in this report.

Recipient-stated actions An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.1

  1. 1

    Implement a Trust Sepsis awareness programme, including a Sepsis Awareness Day.

    Stated by The TrustStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 20 March 2024.

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Implement a Trust Sepsis awareness programme, including a Sepsis Awareness Day.

Verbatim wording from the response

“We have also implemented a Sepsis awareness programme, part of which included a Sepsis Awareness Day on 21st March 2024 which was well very attended by staff. We remain committed to cyclical audits and improvement programmes relating to Sepsis.”

Source location

Response from Princess Alexandra Hospital
Page 2 · response
Published 20 March 2024

Open published response
Back to top

Information checked against the published report and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Official responses located
1/1

Data last updated 7 September 2026