PFD report

Paul Geoffrey Mullen · Prevention of Future Deaths report

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

Issued 17 Nov 2017•Manchester West

Report record

Published report and response evidence

This page connects the concerns raised in this report with statements found in recipients’ published responses. A link shows a clear evidence connection; it does not assign responsibility.

View original report
Concerns
2

Raised in this report

Recipients
2

Named on the report

Responses found
1

Of 2 recipients

Stated actions
7

Described in responses

Source document

Full report text

This is the full text from the original published report.

Open published report

Concerns and recipient responses

Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

Report evidence summary

Concerns raised2

  1. Failure to report prescribed medication non-collection directly to the designated Key Worker
    Part of recurring concern: Failure to provide timely clinical follow-up after medication prescribing
  2. Failure of the medication non-collection reporting threshold to identify concerns after one or two missed daily collections for reliably compliant patients
    Part of recurring concern: Failure to provide timely clinical follow-up after medication prescribing
Responses linked to these concerns

Each statement is shown once, even when linked to more than one concern.

Actions described in response An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.4

  1. Action

    Train all pharmacy staff and locums to use the missed-dose reporting system.

    Stated by Hindley Pharmacy LTDStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 15 February 2018.
  2. Action

    Review missed-medication reporting systems and concerns about the three-day rule.

    Stated by Greater Manchester Mental Health NHS Foundation TrustStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 15 February 2018.
  3. Action

    Implement website-based reporting of each missed supervised methadone or buprenorphine dose.

    Stated by Hindley Pharmacy LTDStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 15 February 2018.

Respondent positions A position is what a recipient says about a concern when it does not describe a specific action.2

  1. Position

    The “red flag system” was not an established system within GMMH or the Wigan and Leigh Recovery Partnership.

    Stated by Greater Manchester Mental Health NHS Foundation TrustDisputes the concernThe respondent disagreed with part of the concern or the basis for it.

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to report prescribed medication non-collection directly to the designated Key Worker

Wider context from the report

“1. During the Inquest evidence was heard that:- i. The deceased was receiving a daily prescription of methadone to be collected and administered on a daily basis from the Pharmacy. The prescriptions were not collected from the Pharmacy on Monday the 18th June 2017, Tuesday the 19th June 2017 and Wednesday the 20th June 2017. ii. There is a system, referred to at the Inquest as a “red flag system”, for a pharmacy to report the non-collection of a prescription of methadone when a patient has not collected the medication on three consecutive occasions. The evidence at the Inquest indicated that the purpose of the report by a pharmacy of non-collection is to enable the Key Worker to be made aware of the non-collection of the medication so that the Key Worker could take appropriate action to contact the patient and to check whether any concerns need to be addressed. iii. The Key Worker attached to the deceased was ████████, who is a Key Worker employed by Addiction, and she gave evidence that the procedure relating to the deceased, and other patients, to report non-collection of medication is for the report to be sent by a pharmacy to GMMH and not directly to the Key Worker. In the case of the deceased, ████████, the deceased’s Key Worker, did not receive a report that the deceased had not collected his methadone on the above dates and she only became aware of his non-collection of methadone by her own enquiry when she telephoned the Pharmacy to request that the prescription of methadone be placed on hold. iv. ████████ also gave evidence that some patients, particularly those patients who are known to be diligent and to collect their medication on time each and every day, may require a report of non-collection of medication earlier than three days because, in relation to those patients, a single failure to collect medication may raise concerns and require enquiries by the Key Worker as to any concerns, in view of the fact that those patients always collect their medication each and every day. v. GMMH is a Mental Health NHS Foundation Trust and is separate in terms of governance, even though working in partnership to an extent, from Addiction, which is described as a Drug, Alcohol and Mental Health Treatment Charity. Accordingly, any report relating to the non-collection of medication addressed to GMMH requires a further onward report from GMMH to Addiction. The governance of GMMH has no control over Practitioners employed by Addiction and GMMH and Addiction do not share computer reporting systems. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Failure to provide timely clinical follow-up after medication prescribing.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure of the medication non-collection reporting threshold to identify concerns after one or two missed daily collections for reliably compliant patients

Wider context from the report

“1. During the Inquest evidence was heard that:- i. The deceased was receiving a daily prescription of methadone to be collected and administered on a daily basis from the Pharmacy. The prescriptions were not collected from the Pharmacy on Monday the 18th June 2017, Tuesday the 19th June 2017 and Wednesday the 20th June 2017. ii. There is a system, referred to at the Inquest as a “red flag system”, for a pharmacy to report the non-collection of a prescription of methadone when a patient has not collected the medication on three consecutive occasions. The evidence at the Inquest indicated that the purpose of the report by a pharmacy of non-collection is to enable the Key Worker to be made aware of the non-collection of the medication so that the Key Worker could take appropriate action to contact the patient and to check whether any concerns need to be addressed. iii. The Key Worker attached to the deceased was ████████, who is a Key Worker employed by Addiction, and she gave evidence that the procedure relating to the deceased, and other patients, to report non-collection of medication is for the report to be sent by a pharmacy to GMMH and not directly to the Key Worker. In the case of the deceased, ████████, the deceased’s Key Worker, did not receive a report that the deceased had not collected his methadone on the above dates and she only became aware of his non-collection of methadone by her own enquiry when she telephoned the Pharmacy to request that the prescription of methadone be placed on hold. iv. ████████ also gave evidence that some patients, particularly those patients who are known to be diligent and to collect their medication on time each and every day, may require a report of non-collection of medication earlier than three days because, in relation to those patients, a single failure to collect medication may raise concerns and require enquiries by the Key Worker as to any concerns, in view of the fact that those patients always collect their medication each and every day. v. GMMH is a Mental Health NHS Foundation Trust and is separate in terms of governance, even though working in partnership to an extent, from Addiction, which is described as a Drug, Alcohol and Mental Health Treatment Charity. Accordingly, any report relating to the non-collection of medication addressed to GMMH requires a further onward report from GMMH to Addiction. The governance of GMMH has no control over Practitioners employed by Addiction and GMMH and Addiction do not share computer reporting systems. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Failure to provide timely clinical follow-up after medication prescribing.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Train all pharmacy staff and locums to use the missed-dose reporting system.

Verbatim wording from the response

“All staff and locums have been trained on the system.”

Source location

2017-0403-Responses
Page 1 · response
Published 15 February 2018

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Review missed-medication reporting systems and concerns about the three-day rule.

Verbatim wording from the response

“The Senior Management Team in GMMH within the Wigan and Leigh Recovery Partnership (WLRP – which is a partnership between GMMH and Addaction) have undertaken a review into the concerns you have raised. To assist you I have provided the Trust response below each of the highlighted concerns.”

Source location

2017-0403-Responses
Page 4 · response
Published 15 February 2018

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Implement website-based reporting of each missed supervised methadone or buprenorphine dose.

Verbatim wording from the response

“From the 1st of April 2018 Addaction took over the management of Wigan’s supervised methadone/buprenorphine program. The new system allows each pharmacy providing a supervised methadone/buprenorphine service, the ability to notify each time of each missed dose via a pharmaceutical website. The Pharm Outcomes website has a one, two and three day missed dose option but we will also continue to manually ring the clients key worker directly when a client has missed 3 days.”

Source location

2017-0403-Responses
Page 1 · response
Published 15 February 2018

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Add the client’s key worker name to every blue supervised prescription.

Verbatim wording from the response

“All blue supervised prescriptions will state the clients key worker name to assist in efficient reporting.”

Source location

2017-0403-Responses
Page 1 · response
Published 15 February 2018

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

The “red flag system” was not an established system within GMMH or the Wigan and Leigh Recovery Partnership.

Verbatim wording from the response

“As you are aware representatives from GMMH were not requested to attend Mr Mullen’s inquest. Following the review of your concerns I am aware that the Addaction worker providing evidence at the inquest has used the term red flag system. However, this is not a term that has been used as a system by any of our Senior Management team at GMMH or within the WLRP. There is a clinical principle (known colloquially as the three day rule) which is outlined in the UK Department of Health and UK guidelines on clinical management 2017 Update (often called the Orange Book). It is possible for a worker to have been advised across the UK clinicians and prescribers. The section 4.6.3 specifies that no further dispenses of drug dependence medication, consecutive doses have been missed, and community pharmacists are then advised to contact the prescribing service in this case would have been GMMH.”

Source location

2017-0403-Responses
Page 4 · response
Published 15 February 2018

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

The established three-day rule is considered sufficient and should continue as the consistent safety process for missed medication collection.

Verbatim wording from the response

“It would be unwise for community pharmacy to advise GMMH each and every time a patient missed a dispense. The situation is, in the GMMH Orange Book, that three days is the critical period in which tolerance to opiates may begin to be lost, and it is best practice in terms of safety that, in that sense, all parties best promote safety by consistently following the three day rule.”

Source location

2017-0403-Responses
Page 6 · response
Published 15 February 2018

Open published response

Other statements in published responses

These actions and other statements could not be clearly connected to one concern in this report.

Recipient-stated actions An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.3

  1. 1

    Complete a full review of GMMH systems before the service-provider transition.

    Stated by Greater Manchester Mental Health NHS Foundation TrustStated plannedThe respondent said that this action was planned when they made their response on 15 February 2018.
  2. 2

    Have the Pharmacy Liaison Worker contact all community pharmacies, explain the three-day rule, and introduce the worker’s role.

    Stated by Greater Manchester Mental Health NHS Foundation TrustStated plannedThe respondent said that this action was planned when they made their response on 15 February 2018.
  3. 3

    Raise community-pharmacy awareness of the three-day rule through GMMH and the Local Pharmaceutical Committee.

    Stated by Greater Manchester Mental Health NHS Foundation TrustStated plannedThe respondent said that this action was planned when they made their response on 15 February 2018.

Recipient positions A position is what a recipient says about a concern when they do not describe a specific action.2

  1. 1

    Training responsibilities lie with the Local Pharmaceutical Committee, Clinical Commissioning Group, and each employing organisation.

    Stated by Greater Manchester Mental Health NHS Foundation TrustRedirects responsibilityThe respondent said that another organisation was responsible for deciding or taking action.
  2. 2

    GMMH cannot require or determine training for staff employed by other agencies.

    Stated by Greater Manchester Mental Health NHS Foundation TrustUnable to actThe respondent said that a constraint prevented them from taking the relevant action.

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Complete a full review of GMMH systems before the service-provider transition.

Verbatim wording from the response

“We would like to make our Bolton Coroners aware that GMMH will only remain to be the clinical provider until 31/3/18 after which the contract with Wigan and Addiction will become the sole provider. We would like to assure you however that GMMH will complete a full review of its systems and will put in place any necessary measures to ensure a safe and smooth transition for the service user population.”

Source location

2017-0403-Responses
Page 7 · response
Published 15 February 2018

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Have the Pharmacy Liaison Worker contact all community pharmacies, explain the three-day rule, and introduce the worker’s role.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Following a review of the concerns you have raised it appears that there may be a lack of awareness of the importance of the three day rule within the body of community pharmacists. In response to this, GMMH and Local Pharmaceutical Committee to draw their attention to the 2018 GMMH and Local Pharmaceutical Committee rule. In addition, the Pharmacy Liaison Worker will proactively contact all community pharmacies by the end of January 2018 to similarly raise awareness of the three day rule and personally introduce himself and his role in order to further develop partnership working.”

Source location

2017-0403-Responses
Page 6 · response
Published 15 February 2018

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Raise community-pharmacy awareness of the three-day rule through GMMH and the Local Pharmaceutical Committee.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Following a review of the concerns you have raised it appears that there may be a lack of awareness of the importance of the three day rule within the body of community pharmacists. In response to this, GMMH and Local Pharmaceutical Committee to draw their attention to the 2018 GMMH and Local Pharmaceutical Committee rule. In addition, the Pharmacy Liaison Worker will proactively contact all community pharmacies by the end of January 2018 to similarly raise awareness of the three day rule and personally introduce himself and his role in order to further develop partnership working.”

Source location

2017-0403-Responses
Page 6 · response
Published 15 February 2018

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Training responsibilities lie with the Local Pharmaceutical Committee, Clinical Commissioning Group, and each employing organisation.

Verbatim wording from the response

“GMMH is not able to determine, require or insist upon training of staff in other agencies other than their own. The training of staff is defined in the terms of the Local Pharmaceutical Committee (LPC) and the Clinical Commissioning Group (CCG) by the Local Pharmaceutical Committee and the NHS Foundation Trust GMMH by Addiction, mental health staff are now able to support any training across this, is requested by the Local Pharmaceutical Committee and/or the CCG which we have done in the past.”

Source location

2017-0403-Responses
Page 6 · response
Published 15 February 2018

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

GMMH cannot require or determine training for staff employed by other agencies.

Verbatim wording from the response

“GMMH is not able to determine, require or insist upon training of staff in other agencies other than their own. The training of staff is defined in the terms of the Local Pharmaceutical Committee (LPC) and the Clinical Commissioning Group (CCG) by the Local Pharmaceutical Committee and the NHS Foundation Trust GMMH by Addiction, mental health staff are now able to support any training across this, is requested by the Local Pharmaceutical Committee and/or the CCG which we have done in the past.”

Source location

2017-0403-Responses
Page 6 · response
Published 15 February 2018

Open published response
Back to top

Information checked against the published report and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Official responses located
1/2

Data last updated 7 September 2026