PFD report

Elizabeth Anne LANG and Katie Alice LANG · Prevention of Future Deaths report

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

Issued 26 Mar 2026•Northumberland

Report record

Published report and response evidence

This page connects the concerns raised in this report with statements found in recipients’ published responses. A link shows a clear evidence connection; it does not assign responsibility.

View original report
Concerns
1

Raised in this report

Recipients
1

Named on the report

Responses found
1

Of 1 recipient

Stated actions
5

Described in responses

Recipients and published responses

Source document

Full report text

This is the full text from the original published report.

Open published report

Concerns and recipient responses

Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

Report evidence summary

Concerns raised1

  1. Lack of advance warning signage for a severe bend
    Part of recurring concern: Inadequate road warning signagePart of recurring concern: Inadequate speed control at hazardous road locationsPart of recurring concern: Uncontrolled collision risks at hazardous road bends
Responses linked to these concerns

Each statement is shown once, even when linked to more than one concern.

Actions described in response An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.2

  1. Action

    Review the site and consider options, including advance warning measures, to improve bend visibility and driver awareness.

    Stated by Northumberland County CouncilStated in progressThe respondent said that this action was in progress when they made their response on 7 April 2026.
  2. Action

    Prioritise identified road-safety improvements for implementation within Quarter 2 of the 2026–2027 financial year.

    Stated by Northumberland County CouncilStated plannedThe respondent said that this action was planned when they made their response on 7 April 2026.

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Lack of advance warning signage for a severe bend

Wider context from the report

“(1) During the course of the inquest I heard Sideway-force Coefficient Investigation Machine testing ('SCRIM' testing) is carried out by the council on an annual basis. Further that the county has responsibility for an extensive road network. SCRIM testing carried out on 18 September 2024 assessed the coefficient of friction as low. I heard that Northumberland County Council has an acceptable level of 0.5. Where the vehicle began to slide the coefficient of friction was 0.22. The deceleration tests identified a coefficient of friction at 0.598g at the initial test site and 0.637g after Bothal Bank. I heard from the Head of Highways at Northumberland County Council that works were undertaken along the A1068 from Sheepwash Bridge to the junction of the A197 as part of the Council's yearly Local Transport Plan. The works consisted of structural repair to the existing carriageway, a surface dressing treatment and new road markings. The nature of this work is seasonal and weather dependent. The works were completed by 3rd July 2025. I heard evidence from three witnesses who are local to the area and have experience of driving along Sheepwash Road. They described the bend where the collision occurred as notorious with experienced drivers routinely reducing speed when navigating the bend. There is no advance warning signage alerting unfamiliar drivers to the severity of the bend. The Forensic Collision Investigator and the Head of Highways agreed advanced warning signage would be helpful. I heard that Traffic sign regulation standards are governed by the Traffic Signs Regulations General Directions 2016. The absence of advance warning signage may present an ongoing risk to road users, particularly those unfamiliar with the road layout. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Inadequate road warning signage; Inadequate speed control at hazardous road locations; Uncontrolled collision risks at hazardous road bends.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Review the site and consider options, including advance warning measures, to improve bend visibility and driver awareness.

Verbatim wording from the response

“• Assessment of mitigation options”

Source location

2026-0182 - Response from Northumberland County Council
Page 2 · response
Published 7 April 2026

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Prioritise identified road-safety improvements for implementation within Quarter 2 of the 2026–2027 financial year.

Verbatim wording from the response

“• Timescales”

Source location

2026-0182 - Response from Northumberland County Council
Page 2 · response
Published 7 April 2026

Open published response

Other statements in published responses

These actions and other statements could not be clearly connected to one concern in this report.

Recipient-stated actions An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.3

  1. 1

    Record the A1068 Sheepwash Road location as a high-risk site for traffic safety assessment.

    Stated by Northumberland County CouncilStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 7 April 2026.
  2. 2

    Complete resurfacing and road-marking works at the site.

    Stated by Northumberland County CouncilStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 7 April 2026.
  3. 3

    Include the site in the 2026–2027 Local Transport Plan programme for traffic safety improvements and formal prioritisation.

    Stated by Northumberland County CouncilStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 7 April 2026.

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Record the A1068 Sheepwash Road location as a high-risk site for traffic safety assessment.

Verbatim wording from the response

“• Site Risk Status”

Source location

2026-0182 - Response from Northumberland County Council
Page 1 · response
Published 7 April 2026

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Complete resurfacing and road-marking works at the site.

Verbatim wording from the response

“• Local Transport Plan inclusion”

Source location

2026-0182 - Response from Northumberland County Council
Page 1 · response
Published 7 April 2026

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Include the site in the 2026–2027 Local Transport Plan programme for traffic safety improvements and formal prioritisation.

Verbatim wording from the response

“• Local Transport Plan inclusion”

Source location

2026-0182 - Response from Northumberland County Council
Page 1 · response
Published 7 April 2026

Open published response
Back to top

Information checked against the published report and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Official responses located
1/1

Data last updated 7 September 2026