PFD report

James Golds · Prevention of Future Deaths report

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

Issued 26 Aug 2021•Manchester South

Report record

Published report and response evidence

This page connects the concerns raised in this report with statements found in recipients’ published responses. A link shows a clear evidence connection; it does not assign responsibility.

View original report
Concerns
3

Raised in this report

Recipients
1

Named on the report

Responses found
1

Of 1 recipient

Stated actions
3

Described in responses

Source document

Full report text

This is the full text from the original published report.

Open published report

Concerns and recipient responses

Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

Report evidence summary

Concerns raised3

  1. Lack of guidance on management and escalation of fire risk in supported accommodation
    Part of recurring concern: Inadequate clarity of fire-safety standards and guidance
  2. Failure of smoke detection systems to provide sufficiently early warning of cigarette-related fires
    Part of recurring concern: Inadequate fire detection and emergency notification for vulnerable people in housingPart of recurring concern: Inadequate management of smoking-related fire risks in vulnerable people
  3. Lack of statutory requirement for sprinkler systems in supported accommodation
    Part of recurring concern: Inadequate sprinkler protection in residential accommodation
Responses linked to these concerns

Each statement is shown once, even when linked to more than one concern.

Actions described in response An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.1

  1. Action

    Conduct a technical review of Approved Document B, including evidence research and review of provisions for new specialised housing and care homes.

    Stated by Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local GovernmentStated in progressThe respondent said that this action was in progress when they made their response on 2 September 2021.

Respondent positions A position is what a recipient says about a concern when it does not describe a specific action.1

  1. Position

    Mandatory sprinklers are not required universally because existing risk-based controls and ongoing reviews tailor fire protection to individual buildings and residents.

    Stated by Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local GovernmentExisting arrangements considered sufficientThe respondent said that existing arrangements were sufficient, so no further action was needed.

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Lack of guidance on management and escalation of fire risk in supported accommodation

Wider context from the report

“1. From the evidence before the court it was clear that Mr Golds presented a significant risk of accidentally starting a fire. He resided in accommodation occupied by vulnerable members of the community who needed some support to live independently. The Court heard that there was little guidance for facilities such as his about how the risk of fire should be managed and escalation of such risk. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Inadequate clarity of fire-safety standards and guidance.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure of smoke detection systems to provide sufficiently early warning of cigarette-related fires

Wider context from the report

“2. In addition in relation to the design and fire prevention features for such accommodation the inquest heard that there was no statutory requirement for sprinkler systems. Smoke detectors were in the hallway areas of each flat but because of the way in which a cigarette related fire developed the detector would not be triggered until the fire was well established. This made it difficult to escape and increase the risk of the fire spreading further. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Inadequate fire detection and emergency notification for vulnerable people in housing; Inadequate management of smoking-related fire risks in vulnerable people.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Lack of statutory requirement for sprinkler systems in supported accommodation

Wider context from the report

“2. In addition in relation to the design and fire prevention features for such accommodation the inquest heard that there was no statutory requirement for sprinkler systems. Smoke detectors were in the hallway areas of each flat but because of the way in which a cigarette related fire developed the detector would not be triggered until the fire was well established. This made it difficult to escape and increase the risk of the fire spreading further. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Inadequate sprinkler protection in residential accommodation.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Conduct a technical review of Approved Document B, including evidence research and review of provisions for new specialised housing and care homes.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Regarding sprinklers specifically, in November 2020 the Government brought forward changes to the guidance to the Building Regulations with regards to fire safety (Approved Document B) reducing the height threshold at which sprinkler systems are provided in new blocks of flats from 30 metres to 11 metres and greatly increased the number of future homes provided with sprinkler protection. This was the first step in a full technical review of Approved Document B, which will include research to ensure that any changes to this guidance is based on a robust evidence base. The technical review programme includes a workstream reviewing the current provisions for new specialised housing and care homes such as the one in which Mr Golds resided.”

Source location

2021-0284-Response-from-Department-for-Levelling-Up-Housing-Communities_Published.pdf
Page 1 · response
Published 2 September 2021

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Mandatory sprinklers are not required universally because existing risk-based controls and ongoing reviews tailor fire protection to individual buildings and residents.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Regarding sprinklers specifically, in November 2020 the Government brought forward changes to the guidance to the Building Regulations with regards to fire safety (Approved Document B) reducing the height threshold at which sprinkler systems are provided in new blocks of flats from 30 metres to 11 metres and greatly increased the number of future homes provided with sprinkler protection. This was the first step in a full technical review of Approved Document B, which will include research to ensure that any changes to this guidance is based on a robust evidence base. The technical review programme includes a workstream reviewing the current provisions for new specialised housing and care homes such as the one in which Mr Golds resided.”

Source location

2021-0284-Response-from-Department-for-Levelling-Up-Housing-Communities_Published.pdf
Page 1 · response
Published 2 September 2021

Open published response

Other statements in published responses

These actions and other statements could not be clearly connected to one concern in this report.

Recipient-stated actions An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.2

  1. 1

    Bring forward the Building Safety Bill safety case review regime to inform decisions on retrofitting sprinklers in existing high-rise buildings in scope.

    Stated by Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local GovernmentStated in progressThe respondent said that this action was in progress when they made their response on 2 September 2021.
  2. 2

    Reduce the sprinkler threshold for new blocks of flats in Approved Document B from 30 metres to 11 metres.

    Stated by Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local GovernmentStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 2 September 2021.

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Bring forward the Building Safety Bill safety case review regime to inform decisions on retrofitting sprinklers in existing high-rise buildings in scope.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Alongside this review of requirements for new homes, the new safety case review regime being brought forward in the Building Safety Bill will inform decisions on retrofitting sprinklers in existing high-rise buildings in scope. This approach will ensure that the layers of protection provided are tailored to the risks in each building.”

Source location

2021-0284-Response-from-Department-for-Levelling-Up-Housing-Communities_Published.pdf
Page 1 · response
Published 2 September 2021

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Reduce the sprinkler threshold for new blocks of flats in Approved Document B from 30 metres to 11 metres.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Regarding sprinklers specifically, in November 2020 the Government brought forward changes to the guidance to the Building Regulations with regards to fire safety (Approved Document B) reducing the height threshold at which sprinkler systems are provided in new blocks of flats from 30 metres to 11 metres and greatly increased the number of future homes provided with sprinkler protection. This was the first step in a full technical review of Approved Document B, which will include research to ensure that any changes to this guidance is based on a robust evidence base. The technical review programme includes a workstream reviewing the current provisions for new specialised housing and care homes such as the one in which Mr Golds resided.”

Source location

2021-0284-Response-from-Department-for-Levelling-Up-Housing-Communities_Published.pdf
Page 1 · response
Published 2 September 2021

Open published response
Back to top

Information checked against the published report and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Official responses located
1/1

Data last updated 7 September 2026