PFD report

Sarah Jane Buckingham · Prevention of Future Deaths report

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

Issued 22 Feb 2021•Hampshire, Portsmouth and Southampton

Report record

Published report and response evidence

This page connects the concerns raised in this report with statements found in recipients’ published responses. A link shows a clear evidence connection; it does not assign responsibility.

View original report
Concerns
1

Raised in this report

Recipients
3

Named on the report

Responses found
0

Of 3 recipients

Stated actions
0

Described in responses

Source document

Full report text

This is the full text from the original published report.

Open published report

Concerns and recipient responses

Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

Report evidence summary

Concerns raised1

  1. Failure to consider hormonal treatment and hormonal triggers when assessing depression in menopausal or perimenopausal women
    Part of recurring concern: Failure to recognise and provide joined-up care for menopause-related deterioration
Responses linked to these concerns

Each statement is shown once, even when linked to more than one concern.

No linked response statements

No respondent-stated action or position is clearly linked to these concerns.

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to consider hormonal treatment and hormonal triggers when assessing depression in menopausal or perimenopausal women

Wider context from the report

“Sarah had been started on Hormone Replacement Therapy (HRT) by her GP in November 2017 as she was peri-menopausal. She began to experience and suffer from symptoms of depression once again in March 2019, and was clinically diagnosed with a depressive illness and anxiety. It was only during a voluntary hospital admission between 28th – 30th July 2019 that Sarah had a blood test taken, which included a hormone profile. This was some four months into her illness and was only taken as 'routine'. It transpired from the evidence at Sarah's Inquest that hormone treatment and/or hormonal triggers for depressive illness were not considered by the Mental Health Clinicians treating Sarah. I heard evidence that those treating Sarah relied on, and followed, NICE Guidelines but that NICE Guidance on Depression does not say anything about the routine monitoring of hormones, or that consideration be given to this potential contributory factor when treating menopausal or perimenopausal women. The significant impact of changing hormones was considered very early on in Sarah's treatment for PND, but was not considered at all during her last episode of depression; with no justification or explanation as to why the impact of changing hormones was considered significant after birth, but not significant during menopause. I believe that an early consideration of these issues when treating a menopausal patient, and understanding of the potential interplay between hormonal changes and depression, may assist in formulating an effective treatment plan for patients such as Sarah. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Failure to recognise and provide joined-up care for menopause-related deterioration.

Open source report
Back to top

Information checked against the published report and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Official responses located
0/3

Data last updated 7 September 2026

No official response is included in the current published snapshot.