PFD report

Kyle James GOATER · Prevention of Future Deaths report

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

Issued 5 Feb 2024•West Yorkshire (Western)

Report record

Published report and response evidence

This page connects the concerns raised in this report with statements found in recipients’ published responses. A link shows a clear evidence connection; it does not assign responsibility.

View original report
Concerns
1

Raised in this report

Recipients
1

Named on the report

Responses found
1

Of 1 recipient

Stated actions
5

Described in responses

Recipients and published responses

Source document

Full report text

This is the full text from the original published report.

Open published report

Concerns and recipient responses

Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

Report evidence summary

Concerns raised1

  1. Failure to provide sufficient advance warning of the layby
    Part of recurring concern: Inadequate road warning signagePart of recurring concern: Inadequate speed control at hazardous road locations
Responses linked to these concerns

Each statement is shown once, even when linked to more than one concern.

Actions described in response An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.1

  1. Action

    Install a Hidden Dip warning sign to alert drivers to the prevailing hazard.

    Stated by Bradford City CouncilStated plannedThe respondent said that this action was planned when they made their response on 12 February 2024.

Respondent positions A position is what a recipient says about a concern when it does not describe a specific action.1

  1. Position

    The privately owned land and informal layby are outside the adopted highway network and not under the Council’s control.

    Stated by Bradford City CouncilOutside remitThe respondent said that this matter was outside its role or authority.

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to provide sufficient advance warning of the layby

Wider context from the report

“As the deceased was travelling in his motor vehicle approaching the brow of the hill on Moor Road controlled by a speed limit of 50mph, no sign was in place to provide a warning as to a layby situated at the bottom of a dip the road which was unforeseen by the deceased. At the bottom of the dip a vehicle was indicating to turn right into the layby, which the deceased travelling in the same traffic lane was not able to avoid, an inevitable collision occurred and as a result of such collision the deceased lost his life. Had the layby been situated elsewhere or signposted well in advance of the crest of the hill it is likely that sufficient warning to an oncoming vehicle would have been provided in time to enable awareness of an oncoming vehicle and a reduction in speed from 50 mph. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Inadequate road warning signage; Inadequate speed control at hazardous road locations.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Install a Hidden Dip warning sign to alert drivers to the prevailing hazard.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Following careful consideration of the circumstances of this collision, the Council has installed a series of bollards on the edge of the carriageway (highway extent) to prevent access to the informal layby so that it can no longer be used by drivers. In addition, the intermittent white line associated with an access which spanned the informal layby has been removed by extending the edge of carriageway road marking across it, thus forming a continuous line and representative of a continuous section of highway. Furthermore, a Hidden Dip warning sign informing drivers of the prevailing hazard has been ordered and will be installed at the very earliest opportunity.”

Source location

Response from Bradford Council
Page 1 · response
Published 12 February 2024

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

The privately owned land and informal layby are outside the adopted highway network and not under the Council’s control.

Verbatim wording from the response

“The land bordering the carriageway is privately owned, therefore not part of the adopted highway network maintainable at public expense or under the control of the Council in any capacity. The informal ‘layby’ which has been created and within which the broken-down vehicle was parked is wholly within this private land. The layby was not created by the Council.”

Source location

Response from Bradford Council
Page 1 · response
Published 12 February 2024

Open published response

Other statements in published responses

These actions and other statements could not be clearly connected to one concern in this report.

Recipient-stated actions An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.4

  1. 1

    Extend the carriageway edge marking across the informal layby access to create a continuous road marking.

    Stated by Bradford City CouncilStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 12 February 2024.
  2. 2

    Install bollards along the carriageway edge to prevent vehicles accessing the informal layby.

    Stated by Bradford City CouncilStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 12 February 2024.
  3. 3

    Review the experimental 30mph speed limit's effects on driver behaviour, road safety and traffic flow.

    Stated by Bradford City CouncilStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 12 February 2024.
  4. 4

    Consult on and formally advertise the proposed 40mph speed limit on Moor Road.

    Stated by Bradford City CouncilStated plannedThe respondent said that this action was planned when they made their response on 12 February 2024.

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Extend the carriageway edge marking across the informal layby access to create a continuous road marking.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Following careful consideration of the circumstances of this collision, the Council has installed a series of bollards on the edge of the carriageway (highway extent) to prevent access to the informal layby so that it can no longer be used by drivers. In addition, the intermittent white line associated with an access which spanned the informal layby has been removed by extending the edge of carriageway road marking across it, thus forming a continuous line and representative of a continuous section of highway. Furthermore, a Hidden Dip warning sign informing drivers of the prevailing hazard has been ordered and will be installed at the very earliest opportunity.”

Source location

Response from Bradford Council
Page 1 · response
Published 12 February 2024

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Install bollards along the carriageway edge to prevent vehicles accessing the informal layby.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Following careful consideration of the circumstances of this collision, the Council has installed a series of bollards on the edge of the carriageway (highway extent) to prevent access to the informal layby so that it can no longer be used by drivers. In addition, the intermittent white line associated with an access which spanned the informal layby has been removed by extending the edge of carriageway road marking across it, thus forming a continuous line and representative of a continuous section of highway. Furthermore, a Hidden Dip warning sign informing drivers of the prevailing hazard has been ordered and will be installed at the very earliest opportunity.”

Source location

Response from Bradford Council
Page 1 · response
Published 12 February 2024

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Review the experimental 30mph speed limit's effects on driver behaviour, road safety and traffic flow.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Finally, following an experimental reduction in the speed limit on Moor Road from 60mph to 30mph, a review has been undertaken on its impact on driver behaviour, road safety, and traffic flow. The review highlighted several issues, most notably the potential occurrence of injudicious overtaking by frustrated drivers who find 30mph to be excessively slow for the road conditions.”

Source location

Response from Bradford Council
Page 2 · response
Published 12 February 2024

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Consult on and formally advertise the proposed 40mph speed limit on Moor Road.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Consultation on the proposed speed limit is to commence this month (October 2024) with formal advertising in November followed by the sealing of the order in December, subject to no objections. Should there be objections, these will be dealt with through the Council’s usual governance procedure. This could delay implementation by 4 – 8 weeks, if the objections are not upheld.”

Source location

Response from Bradford Council
Page 2 · response
Published 12 February 2024

Open published response
Back to top

Information checked against the published report and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Official responses located
1/1

Data last updated 7 September 2026