PFD report

Angela Marion Turner · Prevention of Future Deaths report

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

Issued 26 Jun 2018•Manchester West

Report record

Published report and response evidence

This page connects the concerns raised in this report with statements found in recipients’ published responses. A link shows a clear evidence connection; it does not assign responsibility.

View original report
Concerns
1

Raised in this report

Recipients
1

Named on the report

Responses found
1

Of 1 recipient

Stated actions
0

Described in responses

Recipients and published responses

Source document

Full report text

This is the full text from the original published report.

Open published report

Concerns and recipient responses

Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

Concerns raised1

  1. Inadequate response to calls made to NHS 111
Responses linked to these concerns

Each statement is shown once, even when linked to more than one concern.

No linked response statements

No respondent-stated action or position is clearly linked to these concerns.

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Inadequate response to calls made to NHS 111

Wider context from the report

“Wholly inadequate response to the call made to NHS 111 on the afternoon of 30th December 2017. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

No recurring-concern membership is currently published.

Open source report

Other statements in published responses

These actions and other statements could not be clearly connected to one concern in this report.

Recipient positions A position is what a recipient says about a concern when they do not describe a specific action.1

  1. 1

    Reviewing Walk-in Centre resilience within urgent care is a matter for local determination.

    Stated by Department of Health and Social CareRedirects responsibilityThe respondent said that another organisation was responsible for deciding or taking action.

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Reviewing Walk-in Centre resilience within urgent care is a matter for local determination.

Verbatim wording from the response

“I understand there is work locally to review the resilience of the Walk-in Centre service within the urgent care system to ensure that the NHS can provide a high quality, timely service. These are matters for local determination.”

Source location

2018-0199-Response-by-Department-of-Health-Social-Care
Page 2 · response
Published 10 July 2018

Open published response
Back to top

Information checked against the published report and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Data last updated 7 September 2026