PFD report

Michael Blow · Prevention of Future Deaths report

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

Issued 12 Aug 2016•Portsmouth and South East Hampshire

Report record

Published report and response evidence

This page connects the concerns raised in this report with statements found in recipients’ published responses. A link shows a clear evidence connection; it does not assign responsibility.

View original report
Concerns
6

Raised in this report

Recipients
1

Named on the report

Responses found
0

Of 1 recipient

Stated actions
0

Described in responses

Source document

Full report text

This is the full text from the original published report.

Open published report

Concerns and recipient responses

Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

Report evidence summary

Concerns raised6

  1. Failure to account for current INR and intervening treatments when restarting warfarin
  2. Failure to ensure that junior doctors and nurse practitioners are aware of the relevant anticoagulation protocol
  3. Failure to obtain a requested INR test to establish current INR levels and inform further treatment
Responses linked to these concerns

Each statement is shown once, even when linked to more than one concern.

No linked response statements

No respondent-stated action or position is clearly linked to these concerns.

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to account for current INR and intervening treatments when restarting warfarin

Wider context from the report

“2. Warfarin was restarted after ████████ review but was based on an outdated INR reading of 5.5 taken on admission and no account was taken of the Octaplex and blood transfusion plus any other medication such as antibiotics. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

No recurring-concern membership is currently published.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to ensure that junior doctors and nurse practitioners are aware of the relevant anticoagulation protocol

Wider context from the report

“3. The clinical evidence heard at the inquest suggests that there is a need to highlight the relevant protocol to junior doctors and nurse practitioners and clarify when to reverse the protocol; who is responsible for this sort of clinical decision; and, importantly when to restart normal warfarin treatment. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

No recurring-concern membership is currently published.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to obtain a requested INR test to establish current INR levels and inform further treatment

Wider context from the report

“1. The INR test requested by ████████ during the morning of Saturday 27th was never carried out despite being a basic check to baseline Mr Blow’s INR levels and see what effect the Octaplex and blood transfusion plus any antibiotic treatment since admission may have had on his reading to inform further treatment. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

No recurring-concern membership is currently published.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Lack of clarity about when to restart normal warfarin treatment

Wider context from the report

“3. The clinical evidence heard at the inquest suggests that there is a need to highlight the relevant protocol to junior doctors and nurse practitioners and clarify when to reverse the protocol; who is responsible for this sort of clinical decision; and, importantly when to restart normal warfarin treatment. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

No recurring-concern membership is currently published.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Lack of clarity about responsibility for anticoagulation clinical decisions

Wider context from the report

“3. The clinical evidence heard at the inquest suggests that there is a need to highlight the relevant protocol to junior doctors and nurse practitioners and clarify when to reverse the protocol; who is responsible for this sort of clinical decision; and, importantly when to restart normal warfarin treatment. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

No recurring-concern membership is currently published.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Lack of clarity about when to reverse the anticoagulation protocol

Wider context from the report

“3. The clinical evidence heard at the inquest suggests that there is a need to highlight the relevant protocol to junior doctors and nurse practitioners and clarify when to reverse the protocol; who is responsible for this sort of clinical decision; and, importantly when to restart normal warfarin treatment. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Unreliable anticoagulation reversal decisions.

Open source report
Back to top

Information checked against the published report and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Official responses located
0/1

Data last updated 7 September 2026

No official response is included in the current published snapshot.