PFD report

Abdirahman Afrah · Prevention of Future Deaths report

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

Issued 27 May 2025•East London

Report record

Published report and response evidence

This page connects the concerns raised in this report with statements found in recipients’ published responses. A link shows a clear evidence connection; it does not assign responsibility.

View original report
Concerns
7

Raised in this report

Recipients
1

Named on the report

Responses found
1

Of 1 recipient

Stated actions
14

Described in responses

Recipients and published responses

Source document

Full report text

This is the full text from the original published report.

Open published report

Concerns and recipient responses

Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

Report evidence summary

Concerns raised7

  1. Failure to send relevant results and discharge summaries to the GP in time for appointments
    Part of recurring concern: Failure of hospital discharge-summary processes to provide accurate, complete and timely information to GPsPart of recurring concern: Failure to communicate clinically important information reliably between care services
  2. Failure to commence appropriate investigations at an early stage
    Part of recurring concern: Failure to provide timely urgent diagnostic investigations
  3. Excessive waiting times for assessment in Majors A&E
    Part of recurring concern: Excessive emergency-department waiting times
Responses linked to these concerns

Each statement is shown once, even when linked to more than one concern.

Actions described in response An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.12

  1. Action

    Train regular locum doctors in rapid assessment and treatment.

    Stated by Barts Health NHS TrustStated in progressThe respondent said that this action was in progress when they made their response on 29 May 2025.
  2. Action

    Provide junior doctors with dedicated administration time to check results and communicate them to patients and GP practices.

    Stated by Barts Health NHS TrustStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 29 May 2025.
  3. Action

    Escalate every under-18 patient leaving without treatment to a senior clinician in real time.

    Stated by Barts Health NHS TrustStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 29 May 2025.

Respondent positions A position is what a recipient says about a concern when it does not describe a specific action.1

  1. Position

    A blanket rule requiring disclosure of adolescents’ attendance to parents may not serve their best interests.

    Stated by Barts Health NHS TrustDisputes the concernThe respondent disagreed with part of the concern or the basis for it.

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to send relevant results and discharge summaries to the GP in time for appointments

Wider context from the report

“5. When Abdirahman stated that he would be seeing his GP later that afternoon, he asked for the relevant results to be sent to the GP. Neither the results, nor the discharge summary were sent to the GP in time for the appointment. The inquest heard that the A&E doctor did not know how to share such information with the GP. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Failure of hospital discharge-summary processes to provide accurate, complete and timely information to GPs; Failure to communicate clinically important information reliably between care services.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to commence appropriate investigations at an early stage

Wider context from the report

“2. There was no timely triage of Majors patients by the medical team, to ensure that those with the greatest potential of clinical decline are picked up quickly and appropriate investigations commenced at an early stage. Without such frontloading of care, patients like Abdirahman who might compensate right up to the point of collapse, might be missed again. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Failure to provide timely urgent diagnostic investigations.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Excessive waiting times for assessment in Majors A&E

Wider context from the report

“1. The inquest heard that waiting times to be seen in Majors A&E at Newham University Hospital could sometimes be between 9 to 14 hours. Many patients are unable to tolerate such long waits and leave the department before being seen. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Excessive emergency-department waiting times.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to directly discuss the need to return to A&E with a responsible parent of a young patient

Wider context from the report

“4. Abdirahman was 17 years old. He declined to return to A&E. There was no direct discussion with a responsible parent about the need to return to A&E. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

No recurring-concern membership is currently published.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to provide timely medical triage of Majors patients at risk of clinical decline

Wider context from the report

“2. There was no timely triage of Majors patients by the medical team, to ensure that those with the greatest potential of clinical decline are picked up quickly and appropriate investigations commenced at an early stage. Without such frontloading of care, patients like Abdirahman who might compensate right up to the point of collapse, might be missed again. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Unreliable emergency-department triage.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to ensure doctors have complete relevant clinical information when calling patients who have left A&E

Wider context from the report

“3. When the doctor called Abdirahman the following afternoon, she did not have all of the relevant clinical information to hand. She was not aware of the compensated metabolic acidosis. It is unlikely that she advised Abdirahman of the importance of returning to the hospital. It is foreseeable that patients may be reticent to return to A&E, because of the lengthy waits, so doctors making the call to patients who have left, should be fully informed about the clinical condition and risks. The risk of not returning should be made very clear. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

No recurring-concern membership is currently published.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to clearly communicate the risk of not returning to hospital

Wider context from the report

“3. When the doctor called Abdirahman the following afternoon, she did not have all of the relevant clinical information to hand. She was not aware of the compensated metabolic acidosis. It is unlikely that she advised Abdirahman of the importance of returning to the hospital. It is foreseeable that patients may be reticent to return to A&E, because of the lengthy waits, so doctors making the call to patients who have left, should be fully informed about the clinical condition and risks. The risk of not returning should be made very clear. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Failure to ensure care staff can communicate effectively with residents and patients.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Train regular locum doctors in rapid assessment and treatment.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Since August 2024, enhanced RAT training has been added to the induction of all resident doctors above foundation level and there is an active program to train all regular locum doctors in this process. This has increased our capacity to front-load tests and investigations throughout the day and night.”

Source location

2025-0245- Response from Barts Health NHS Foundation Trust
Page 2 · response
Published 29 May 2025

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Provide junior doctors with dedicated administration time to check results and communicate them to patients and GP practices.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Since August 2024 we introduced specific administration time for junior doctors in ED to check results. During this process all resident doctors have been using Accurx to contact patients and GP practices and thus the use of this form of communication has increased significantly.”

Source location

2025-0245- Response from Barts Health NHS Foundation Trust
Page 6 · response
Published 29 May 2025

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Escalate every under-18 patient leaving without treatment to a senior clinician in real time.

Verbatim wording from the response

“We have included a section in our current staff safety bulletin that any patients under 18 who have left without treatment must be escalated to a senior clinician in real time so that the appropriate response can be decided upon and implemented.”

Source location

2025-0245- Response from Barts Health NHS Foundation Trust
Page 5 · response
Published 29 May 2025

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Expand Same Day Emergency Care capacity by enlarging space, merging clinical teams and increasing staffing.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Over the past 12 months we have expanded our physical space in the Same Day Emergency Care (SDEC) area. We have also merged our ambulatory medical and emergency medical clinical teams working in this area, with additional increase in clinical staffing numbers. This has allowed suitable patients to be directed to the most suitable clinical area and as a result this has reduced waiting times in the emergency department and improved patient experience. For example, patients presenting with chest pain follow one of the key pathways that can be assessed on SDEC, as well as easing the pressure on emergency patients in the main department.”

Source location

2025-0245- Response from Barts Health NHS Foundation Trust
Page 3 · response
Published 29 May 2025

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Operate a dedicated Fast Lane for walk-in emergency patient assessment and treatment.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Since October 2024 we have introduced a new ‘Fast Lane’ for assessment and treatment of walk-in emergency patients. The provision of an area with consultation rooms and dedicated ED doctors has resulted in decreased waiting times for this group of patients and improved performance against the 4-hour target for non-admitted emergency patients from 50 to 65%.”

Source location

2025-0245- Response from Barts Health NHS Foundation Trust
Page 3 · response
Published 29 May 2025

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Use customised acuity flags to prioritise patients with specified clinical, infectious, vulnerability or mental-health risks.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Acuity flags and concerns. We have introduced a customised acuity rating system for patients falling into different risk groups to draw attention and give priority. These are those who have infectious diseases, those who are vulnerable (through physical or other disability, hearing or communication issues), mental health presentations and those who have clinical concerns requiring prompt response (sickle cell, crisis cancer with immunosuppression, sepsis).”

Source location

2025-0245- Response from Barts Health NHS Foundation Trust
Page 4 · response
Published 29 May 2025

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Use electronic vital-sign frequency and red-heart alerts to prompt repeat observations and urgent attention.

Verbatim wording from the response

“In the last 12 months we have implemented several electronic tools that provide at a glance prompts to senior medical and nursing staff. These are designed to draw attention to patients who need immediate action or should be seen sooner.”

Source location

2025-0245- Response from Barts Health NHS Foundation Trust
Page 4 · response
Published 29 May 2025

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Use hospital-wide action cards to manage prolonged emergency department waits and escalate workload pressures.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Recognising that a functioning ED and manageable waiting times depend on a whole hospital response, ‘action cards’ have been created which give actions to ED nursing and medical teams, hospital site management and specialty teams to manage long waits in ED. Actions include direct referral to specialty teams to see patients, accessing escalation areas, triggering contact with Trust managers and directors to manage workload across the Group.”

Source location

2025-0245- Response from Barts Health NHS Foundation Trust
Page 4 · response
Published 29 May 2025

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Increase senior resident staffing to provide greater senior oversight and earlier decisions in the emergency department.

Verbatim wording from the response

“We have successfully recruited to all of our consultant vacancies in the last 6 months and will have a significant increase in senior residents managing the department from August 2025. This increase in senior decision makers will enhance the safety in the department overall, with senior oversight over the queue and earlier definitive decision making in the patient journey with a resultant reduction in waiting times.”

Source location

2025-0245- Response from Barts Health NHS Foundation Trust
Page 3 · response
Published 29 May 2025

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Add enhanced rapid assessment training to resident doctor induction.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Since August 2024, enhanced RAT training has been added to the induction of all resident doctors above foundation level and there is an active program to train all regular locum doctors in this process. This has increased our capacity to front-load tests and investigations throughout the day and night.”

Source location

2025-0245- Response from Barts Health NHS Foundation Trust
Page 2 · response
Published 29 May 2025

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Update and formalise the Left Without Treatment policy covering patient risk advice, under-18 safeguards and urgent clinical information sharing.

Verbatim wording from the response

“The responses will be delivered in an updated ‘Left Without Treatment’ (LWOT) policy (drafted and waiting formal review and stakeholder approval) and an immediate safety bulletin which will be actively shared to all staff groups in the Emergency Department. This will be shared electronically, and daily at in-person handovers to reach as many staff as possible to effect immediate change in practice. More detail is included in each section.”

Source location

2025-0245- Response from Barts Health NHS Foundation Trust
Page 1 · response
Published 29 May 2025

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Improve initial self-presenting patient assessment through a quality improvement project, assessment pathways and nursing education.

Verbatim wording from the response

“There is an active quality improvement project ongoing which is aimed at improving processes for initial assessment of patients self-presenting to the emergency department. The aim of this project is to decrease initial assessment waiting times. In addition, there is a focused area for high-risk patients where there is increased availability of the RAT Dr to respond to queries, review patients, request imaging and start treatments. The project includes introducing easy to follow assessment”

Source location

2025-0245- Response from Barts Health NHS Foundation Trust
Page 2 · response
Published 29 May 2025

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

A blanket rule requiring disclosure of adolescents’ attendance to parents may not serve their best interests.

Verbatim wording from the response

“We recognise that those under the age of 18 are children by law and, where appropriate, a responsible adult or person with parental responsibility is likely to need to be contacted. However, adolescents are special group that deserve due consideration. It would not be appropriate to make a blanket rule to disclose information about attendance to a parent or guardian when in some cases this may not be in the best interests of the adolescent.”

Source location

2025-0245- Response from Barts Health NHS Foundation Trust
Page 5 · response
Published 29 May 2025

Open published response

Other statements in published responses

These actions and other statements could not be clearly connected to one concern in this report.

Recipient-stated actions An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.2

  1. 1

    Disseminate an immediate Left Without Treatment safety bulletin electronically and during daily Emergency Department handovers.

    Stated by Barts Health NHS TrustStated plannedThe respondent said that this action was planned when they made their response on 29 May 2025.
  2. 2

    Use electronic VBG and ECG notifications requiring doctor acknowledgement and review.

    Stated by Barts Health NHS TrustStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 29 May 2025.

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Disseminate an immediate Left Without Treatment safety bulletin electronically and during daily Emergency Department handovers.

Verbatim wording from the response

“The responses will be delivered in an updated ‘Left Without Treatment’ (LWOT) policy (drafted and waiting formal review and stakeholder approval) and an immediate safety bulletin which will be actively shared to all staff groups in the Emergency Department. This will be shared electronically, and daily at in-person handovers to reach as many staff as possible to effect immediate change in practice. More detail is included in each section.”

Source location

2025-0245- Response from Barts Health NHS Foundation Trust
Page 1 · response
Published 29 May 2025

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Use electronic VBG and ECG notifications requiring doctor acknowledgement and review.

Verbatim wording from the response

“In the last 12 months we have implemented several electronic tools that provide at a glance prompts to senior medical and nursing staff. These are designed to draw attention to patients who need immediate action or should be seen sooner.”

Source location

2025-0245- Response from Barts Health NHS Foundation Trust
Page 4 · response
Published 29 May 2025

Open published response
Back to top

Information checked against the published report and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Official responses located
1/1

Data last updated 7 September 2026