Eliza Bashir · Prevention of Future Deaths report

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

Issued 24 Oct 2014•Manchester North

Published report and response evidence

This report’s concerns and statements found in recipients’ published responses. Statements are included even where no link to an individual concern is recorded. A link shows an evidence connection; it does not assign responsibility.

View original report
Concerns
4

Raised in this report

Recipients
3

Named on the report

Responses found
1

Of 3 recipients

Stated actions
4

Described in responses

Full report text

This is the full text from the original published report.

Open published report

Concerns and recipient responses

Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

Report evidence summary

Concerns raised4

  1. Unsafe retail display of button batteries accessible to small children
  2. Lack of lockable battery compartments in non-toy torches
  3. Lack of knowledge about managing incidents involving ingested button batteries

Stated actions An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.4

  1. Department of Health and Social Care

    Share button-battery risk information with health visitors, school nurses and regional Public Health England child-health leads.

  2. Department of Health and Social Care

    Consider how best to support health professionals in using button-battery information to inform parents and child carers.

  3. Department of Health and Social Care

    Share the coroner’s report with Department for Business, Innovation and Skills colleagues to address retail button-battery safety concerns.

  4. Department of Health and Social Care

    Contact National Social Partnership Forum members to raise awareness of button-battery risks.

Respondent positions A position is what a recipient says about a concern when it does not describe a specific action.1

  1. Department of Health and Social Care

    Retailers are responsible for addressing the display and placement of button batteries in retail outlets.

    Redirects responsibilityThe respondent said that another organisation was responsible for deciding or taking action.

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Unsafe retail display of button batteries accessible to small children

Wider context from the report

“4. Concern remains that such batteries are sold in supermarkets and other retail establishments and are often on display at a level that would enable small children to gain access to them whilst unobserved. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

No recurring-concern membership is currently published.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Lack of lockable battery compartments in non-toy torches

Wider context from the report

“1. Evidence from the Trading Standards Officer confirmed that because the torch was not classified as a toy, it did not require a lockable battery compartment, notwithstanding compliance with safety regulations. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

No recurring-concern membership is currently published.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Lack of knowledge about managing incidents involving ingested button batteries

Wider context from the report

“2. Consultant Paediatric Surgeon frankly asserted that both he and his colleagues were still worried as they did not know how best to deal with incidents such as this and whilst awareness of the risks and complications arising from ingested button batteries were being raised locally, there was a need for the profile of those risks to be raised nationally. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

No recurring-concern membership is currently published.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Insufficient national awareness of the risks of ingested button batteries

Wider context from the report

“2. Consultant Paediatric Surgeon frankly asserted that both he and his colleagues were still worried as they did not know how best to deal with incidents such as this and whilst awareness of the risks and complications arising from ingested button batteries were being raised locally, there was a need for the profile of those risks to be raised nationally. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Insufficient public awareness of button-battery ingestion risks.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Share button-battery risk information with health visitors, school nurses and regional Public Health England child-health leads.

Verbatim wording from the response

“However, I will ensure that the information in your letter and this reply is shared with health visitors, school nurses and the child health leads at Public Health England’s regional centres so that awareness of the risks of button batteries is further raised. My officials will give consideration as to how these professionals can best be supported to use this information to make parents and child carers aware of this issue.”

Source location

2014-0461-Response-by-Department-of-Health
Page 3 · response
Published 24 October 2014

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Consider how best to support health professionals in using button-battery information to inform parents and child carers.

Verbatim wording from the response

“However, I will ensure that the information in your letter and this reply is shared with health visitors, school nurses and the child health leads at Public Health England’s regional centres so that awareness of the risks of button batteries is further raised. My officials will give consideration as to how these professionals can best be supported to use this information to make parents and child carers aware of this issue.”

Source location

2014-0461-Response-by-Department-of-Health
Page 3 · response
Published 24 October 2014

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Share the coroner’s report with Department for Business, Innovation and Skills colleagues to address retail button-battery safety concerns.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Although your concern relating to the display and placement of button batteries in retail outlets is a matter for the retailers concerned, my officials have however, shared a copy of your report with colleagues in the Department of Business, Innovation and Skills (BIS). I expect them to liaise with the Royal Society for the Prevention of Accidents (RoSPA) and the National Trading Standards Board (NTSB) to explore a way to address this concern with retailers.”

Source location

2014-0461-Response-by-Department-of-Health
Page 2 · response
Published 24 October 2014

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Contact National Social Partnership Forum members to raise awareness of button-battery risks.

Verbatim wording from the response

“In addition, my officials will contact the membership of the National Social Partnership Forum, which includes NHS trade unions and employers, to raise awareness of the issues concerning button batteries as outlined in your report. I hope that this response is helpful and I am grateful to you for bringing the circumstances of Eliza’s death to my attention.”

Source location

2014-0461-Response-by-Department-of-Health
Page 3 · response
Published 24 October 2014

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Retailers are responsible for addressing the display and placement of button batteries in retail outlets.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Although your concern relating to the display and placement of button batteries in retail outlets is a matter for the retailers concerned, my officials have however, shared a copy of your report with colleagues in the Department of Business, Innovation and Skills (BIS). I expect them to liaise with the Royal Society for the Prevention of Accidents (RoSPA) and the National Trading Standards Board (NTSB) to explore a way to address this concern with retailers.”

Source location

2014-0461-Response-by-Department-of-Health
Page 2 · response
Published 24 October 2014

Open published response
Back to top

Information checked against the published report and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Official responses located
1/3

Data last updated 7 September 2026