John Edward Hill · Prevention of Future Deaths report

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

Issued 25 Jun 2018•Dorset

Published report and response evidence

This report’s concerns and statements found in recipients’ published responses. Statements are included even where no link to an individual concern is recorded. A link shows an evidence connection; it does not assign responsibility.

View original report
Concerns
1

Raised in this report

Recipients
2

Named on the report

Responses found
3

Of 2 recipients

Stated actions
9

Described in responses

Full report text

This is the full text from the original published report.

Open published report

Concerns and recipient responses

Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

Report evidence summary

Concerns raised1

  1. Failure to routinely seek information from family members or cohabitants when assessing firearm applications
    Part of recurring concern: Unreliable firearms licensing risk assessment and information sharing

Stated actions An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.9

  1. Durham Constabulary

    Expect firearms enquiry officers to conduct diligent, professionally curious enquiries during applicants’ home visits and interactions.

  2. Home Office

    Use the statutory power introduced through the Policing and Crime Act 2017 to publish guidance on police firearms licensing functions.

  3. Home Office

    Consult police on the terms of new statutory guidance for firearms licensing functions.

  4. Home Office

    Draft statutory guidance inviting police to consider interviewing people beyond applicants and referees where necessary to assess suitability.

  5. National Fire Chiefs Council

    Consider including emollient creams among the issues addressed during Safe and Well visits.

  6. National Fire Chiefs Council

    Develop the expanded Safe and Well home-visit programme with NHS colleagues to address a wider range of health and safety issues.

  7. National Fire Chiefs Council

    Use safety campaign, online and press channels to promote warnings about flammable emollient creams.

  8. National Fire Chiefs Council

    Disseminate information about emollient-cream hazards from this and the 2007 case to all fire and rescue services through internal communications.

  9. National Fire Chiefs Council

    Have the Home Safety Committee consider further ways to promote safety messages about paraffin-based emollient creams.

Respondent positions A position is what a recipient says about a concern when it does not describe a specific action.3

  1. Durham Constabulary

    The diverse circumstances of firearms applicants make it impractical to prescribe mandatory enquiry steps beyond existing intelligence, conviction and medical checks.

    Unable to actThe respondent said that a constraint prevented them from taking the relevant action.
  2. Home Office

    A blanket requirement for routine family interviews is unnecessary because intelligence-based and targeted checks are considered sufficient.

    No action considered necessaryThe respondent said that no further action was needed.
  3. National Fire Chiefs Council

    It lacks regulatory or enforcement powers to require fire and rescue services to make changes.

    Outside remitThe respondent said that this matter was outside its role or authority.

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to routinely seek information from family members or cohabitants when assessing firearm applications

Wider context from the report

“v. Evidence was further given that in the Dorset Police policy entitled “Firearms and Explosive Licensing Risk Management Procedure’ dated the 8th May 2015 there is no reference to such contact with family members, friends or associates and that family members or those living at the same address of the applicant, will not be contacted as standard practice. They may, as above, be contacted where there is evidence of domestic abuse. vi. Evidence was given that it would be beneficial for the Firearms Unit at Dorset Police to write to those living with the applicant to invite them to raise any concerns they wish to in relation to the application. Although this may not be responded to, at least it gives those close to the applicant an opportunity to raise their concerns. There may be for example domestic violence ongoing at the address that has not been brought to the Police Force’s attention due to lack of reporting. This would be key to the firearm application. 2. I have concerns with regard to the following: i. When the Police consider a firearm application, there may be valuable information that those close to the applicant may have, in circumstances where there is no domestic abuse or violence. Those living with the applicant may have vital information, which could impact upon the grant of a firearms certificate. This information may therefore be key to preventing a future death. ii. In view of this I would request that consideration is given to reviewing the national and local guidance in relation to the assessment criteria and enquiries to be considered regarding applications for firearm certificates, and for consideration to be given that those enquiries involve the applicant’s family members, or at the very least those living with the applicant. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Unreliable firearms licensing risk assessment and information sharing.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Expect firearms enquiry officers to conduct diligent, professionally curious enquiries during applicants’ home visits and interactions.

Verbatim wording from the response

“In determining what might constitute “all circumstances”, I outlined how I expect Firearms Enquiry Officers (FEO) to carry out diligent enquiries with appropriate professional curiosity during their home visits and interactions with applicants for a firearms certificate.”

Source location

2018-0195-Response-by-Durham-Constabulary
Page 1 · response
Published 10 July 2018

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Use the statutory power introduced through the Policing and Crime Act 2017 to publish guidance on police firearms licensing functions.

Verbatim wording from the response

“The Government introduced a power, through the Policing and Crime Act 2017, for the Home Secretary to publish statutory guidance to the police on their firearms licensing functions. The legislation requires that we consult with the police before publishing the new guidance. We intend to consult on the terms of this shortly. We intend that the draft should go further than the current guidance, in inviting the police to consider whether to conduct interviews with individuals other than the applicant or their referees, including neighbours, partners or representatives of shooting clubs attended by the applicant. We intend that these checks be considered where, following initial enquiries, they believe them to be necessary to assess suitability.”

Source location

2018-0195-Responses
Page 1 · response
Published 10 July 2018

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Consult police on the terms of new statutory guidance for firearms licensing functions.

Verbatim wording from the response

“The Government introduced a power, through the Policing and Crime Act 2017, for the Home Secretary to publish statutory guidance to the police on their firearms licensing functions. The legislation requires that we consult with the police before publishing the new guidance. We intend to consult on the terms of this shortly. We intend that the draft should go further than the current guidance, in inviting the police to consider whether to conduct interviews with individuals other than the applicant or their referees, including neighbours, partners or representatives of shooting clubs attended by the applicant. We intend that these checks be considered where, following initial enquiries, they believe them to be necessary to assess suitability.”

Source location

2018-0195-Responses
Page 1 · response
Published 10 July 2018

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Draft statutory guidance inviting police to consider interviewing people beyond applicants and referees where necessary to assess suitability.

Verbatim wording from the response

“The Government introduced a power, through the Policing and Crime Act 2017, for the Home Secretary to publish statutory guidance to the police on their firearms licensing functions. The legislation requires that we consult with the police before publishing the new guidance. We intend to consult on the terms of this shortly. We intend that the draft should go further than the current guidance, in inviting the police to consider whether to conduct interviews with individuals other than the applicant or their referees, including neighbours, partners or representatives of shooting clubs attended by the applicant. We intend that these checks be considered where, following initial enquiries, they believe them to be necessary to assess suitability.”

Source location

2018-0195-Responses
Page 1 · response
Published 10 July 2018

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Consider including emollient creams among the issues addressed during Safe and Well visits.

Verbatim wording from the response

“CFOA are currently working closely with NHS colleagues on the development of an expanded version of the usual fire service Home Fire and Safety Check, called a “Safe and Well” visit. This will take account of a wider range of health and safety issues, and make use of the 670,000 or so home visits undertaken by services each year to promote and undertake health interventions. We will be sure to consider emollient creams as one of the issues to be included as part of these visits.”

Source location

2015-0195-Response-by-CFOA
Page 1 · response
Published 10 July 2018

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Develop the expanded Safe and Well home-visit programme with NHS colleagues to address a wider range of health and safety issues.

Verbatim wording from the response

“CFOA are currently working closely with NHS colleagues on the development of an expanded version of the usual fire service Home Fire and Safety Check, called a “Safe and Well” visit. This will take account of a wider range of health and safety issues, and make use of the 670,000 or so home visits undertaken by services each year to promote and undertake health interventions. We will be sure to consider emollient creams as one of the issues to be included as part of these visits.”

Source location

2015-0195-Response-by-CFOA
Page 1 · response
Published 10 July 2018

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Use safety campaign, online and press channels to promote warnings about flammable emollient creams.

Verbatim wording from the response

“CFOA also run our own safety campaign weeks and regularly promote safety messages online and via the press. We will use these channels to promote safety warnings relating to these creams.”

Source location

2015-0195-Response-by-CFOA
Page 1 · response
Published 10 July 2018

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Disseminate information about emollient-cream hazards from this and the 2007 case to all fire and rescue services through internal communications.

Verbatim wording from the response

“The dangers posed by emollient creams has been highlighted before, and a number of fire and rescue services already include warnings about flammable emollient creams as part of their fire safety messages, in particular targeted towards older people. We have taken steps to disseminate the information from this particular case (and the previous information relating to the 2007 case) to all fire and rescue services through our internal communications channels.”

Source location

2015-0195-Response-by-CFOA
Page 1 · response
Published 10 July 2018

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Have the Home Safety Committee consider further ways to promote safety messages about paraffin-based emollient creams.

Verbatim wording from the response

“This matter will be considered in greater detail by the CFOA Home Safety Committee with a view to establishing what further ways we can promote safety messages around the use of paraffin based emollient creams.”

Source location

2015-0195-Response-by-CFOA
Page 2 · response
Published 10 July 2018

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

The diverse circumstances of firearms applicants make it impractical to prescribe mandatory enquiry steps beyond existing intelligence, conviction and medical checks.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Because of the very diverse nature of applicant situations it is very challenging to give a prescribed series of steps that must be carried out in each case, over and above existing intelligence convictions and medical checks. We discussed how there are situations where this could give a false perception that an applicant could be suitable were further investigations not carried out by the FEO.”

Source location

2018-0195-Response-by-Durham-Constabulary
Page 1 · response
Published 10 July 2018

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

A blanket requirement for routine family interviews is unnecessary because intelligence-based and targeted checks are considered sufficient.

Verbatim wording from the response

“I have obtained the views of the National Police Chiefs' Council on this issue, which were informed by discussions with members of the Firearms and Explosives Licensing Working Group. The advice that I have received is that there is no need to introduce a new blanket policy of interviewing members of an applicant's family in the case of all applications for firearms certificates, in order to establish whether they have any concerns. The alternative is an intelligence-based approach, which will now be delivered through new accreditation standards for Firearms Enquiry Officers in police forces, which is being developed by the College of Policing. This will encourage “professional curiosity” to ensure that such avenues are pursued whenever they are likely to be relevant.”

Source location

2018-0195-Responses
Page 1 · response
Published 10 July 2018

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

It lacks regulatory or enforcement powers to require fire and rescue services to make changes.

Verbatim wording from the response

“For the sake of clarity, I must point out that CFOA has no regulatory or enforcement powers which require change from fire and rescue service. However, we do provide advice and guidance to fire and rescue services and are keen to ensure we learn lessons at every opportunity and share vital safety messages.”

Source location

2015-0195-Response-by-CFOA
Page 1 · response
Published 10 July 2018

Open published response
Back to top

Information checked against the published report and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Official responses located
3/2

Data last updated 7 September 2026