PFD report

Thomas Allan Ratchford · Prevention of Future Deaths report

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

Issued 11 May 2018•Manchester North

Report record

Published report and response evidence

This page connects the concerns raised in this report with statements found in recipients’ published responses. A link shows a clear evidence connection; it does not assign responsibility.

View original report
Concerns
2

Raised in this report

Recipients
1

Named on the report

Responses found
0

Of 1 recipient

Stated actions
0

Described in responses

Recipients and published responses

Source document

Full report text

This is the full text from the original published report.

Open published report

Concerns and recipient responses

Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

Report evidence summary

Concerns raised2

  1. Lack of sufficient training in moving and handling and pressure relief
    Part of recurring concern: Unsafe moving and handling of patients
  2. Failure to obtain specialist advice before using a hoist to provide pressure relief
Responses linked to these concerns

Each statement is shown once, even when linked to more than one concern.

No linked response statements

No respondent-stated action or position is clearly linked to these concerns.

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Lack of sufficient training in moving and handling and pressure relief

Wider context from the report

“The use of the hoist to provide pressure relief is not one that was either recognised or recommended by the Tissue Viability Nurse who gave evidence at the inquest. It was a practice that had been adopted by the carers at Marland Court Residential Home without obtaining advice from either the hoist manufacturers or the District Nurses. Had advice been taken, the carers would have been informed that it was not recommended. The matter of concern that neither the Home Manager or the carers had received sufficient training in moving and handling and pressure relief. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Unsafe moving and handling of patients.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to obtain specialist advice before using a hoist to provide pressure relief

Wider context from the report

“The use of the hoist to provide pressure relief is not one that was either recognised or recommended by the Tissue Viability Nurse who gave evidence at the inquest. It was a practice that had been adopted by the carers at Marland Court Residential Home without obtaining advice from either the hoist manufacturers or the District Nurses. Had advice been taken, the carers would have been informed that it was not recommended. The matter of concern that neither the Home Manager or the carers had received sufficient training in moving and handling and pressure relief. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

No recurring-concern membership is currently published.

Open source report
Back to top

Information checked against the published report and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Official responses located
0/1

Data last updated 7 September 2026

No official response is included in the current published snapshot.