PFD report

Herbert John Bernard Francis · Prevention of Future Deaths report

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

Issued 26 Jul 2018•Carmarthenshire and Pembrokeshire

Report record

Published report and response evidence

This page connects the concerns raised in this report with statements found in recipients’ published responses. A link shows a clear evidence connection; it does not assign responsibility.

View original report
Concerns
5

Raised in this report

Recipients
2

Named on the report

Responses found
1

Of 2 recipients

Stated actions
3

Described in responses

Source document

Full report text

This is the full text from the original published report.

Open published report

Concerns and recipient responses

Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

Report evidence summary

Concerns raised5

  1. Absence of a westbound left-turn filter lane from the A40 onto Redstone Road
  2. Insufficient length and width of both filter lanes on the A40
    Part of recurring concern: Unsafe road width for vehicle passage
  3. Insufficient speed control or warning at the upcoming bend and junction
    Part of recurring concern: Inadequate road warning signage
Responses linked to these concerns

Each statement is shown once, even when linked to more than one concern.

Actions described in response An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.1

  1. Action

    Conduct a three-year speed-limit review, prioritising the report’s concerns and recommendations for consideration in the first tranche of sites.

    Stated by Welsh GovernmentStated in progressThe respondent said that this action was in progress when they made their response on 23 September 2018.

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Absence of a westbound left-turn filter lane from the A40 onto Redstone Road

Wider context from the report

“(4) That filter lanes should also be introduced on the A40 for vehicles heading westbound and intending to turn left onto Redstone Road. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

No recurring-concern membership is currently published.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Insufficient length and width of both filter lanes on the A40

Wider context from the report

“(2) That both filter lanes on the A40 at this location should be made longer and wider. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Unsafe road width for vehicle passage.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Insufficient speed control or warning at the upcoming bend and junction

Wider context from the report

“(3) That consideration should be given to lowering the speed limit along this stretch of road, or by placing advisory speed limit signs at the location to warn motorists of the upcoming bend and junction. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Inadequate road warning signage.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Inadequate positioning of national speed limit signs near the junction mouth

Wider context from the report

“(1) The approach to the main A40 from Redstone Road could be further enhanced with the introduction of road markings and early warning signs. That consideration should be given to the re-positioning of the national speed limit signs from their current location to closer to the mouth of the junction. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

No recurring-concern membership is currently published.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Lack of road markings and early warning signs on the approach to the main A40 from Redstone Road

Wider context from the report

“(1) The approach to the main A40 from Redstone Road could be further enhanced with the introduction of road markings and early warning signs. That consideration should be given to the re-positioning of the national speed limit signs from their current location to closer to the mouth of the junction. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Inadequate road markings for road-user safety; Inadequate road warning signage.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Conduct a three-year speed-limit review, prioritising the report’s concerns and recommendations for consideration in the first tranche of sites.

Verbatim wording from the response

“My officials are currently in the process of carrying out a three year speed limit review looking at road safety issues at over 600 sites on all trunk roads in Wales. I have asked my officials to consider the concerns and recommendations raised in the report are considered as a priority as part of the review and addressed within the first tranche of sites reviewed during this financial year.”

Source location

2018-0242-Response-by-Welsh-Government
Page 1 · response
Published 23 September 2018

Open published response

Other statements in published responses

These actions and other statements could not be clearly connected to one concern in this report.

Recipient-stated actions An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.2

  1. 1

    Develop further overtaking opportunities and safety improvements along the A40, including improvements at Redstone Cross.

    Stated by Welsh GovernmentStated in progressThe respondent said that this action was in progress when they made their response on 23 September 2018.
  2. 2

    Develop a programme and package for delivering the additional A40 improvements alongside other National Transport Finance Plan priorities.

    Stated by Welsh GovernmentStated plannedThe respondent said that this action was planned when they made their response on 23 September 2018.

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Develop further overtaking opportunities and safety improvements along the A40, including improvements at Redstone Cross.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Preliminary investigations have begun to develop further overtaking opportunities & safety improvements along the length of the A40. This includes improvements at Redstone Cross.”

Source location

2018-0242-Response-by-Welsh-Government
Page 1 · response
Published 23 September 2018

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Develop a programme and package for delivering the additional A40 improvements alongside other National Transport Finance Plan priorities.

Verbatim wording from the response

“We are currently looking about how these improvements can be packaged and when they can be delivered alongside other priorities in the NTFP. To date no programme has been established to deliver these improvements and one will be developed in due course.”

Source location

2018-0242-Response-by-Welsh-Government
Page 2 · response
Published 23 September 2018

Open published response
Back to top

Information checked against the published report and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Official responses located
1/2

Data last updated 7 September 2026