PFD report

Sylvia Linda WHITE · Prevention of Future Deaths report

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

Issued 30 Jan 2024•East Riding and Hull

Report record

Published report and response evidence

This page connects the concerns raised in this report with statements found in recipients’ published responses. A link shows a clear evidence connection; it does not assign responsibility.

View original report
Concerns
2

Raised in this report

Recipients
1

Named on the report

Responses found
1

Of 1 recipient

Stated actions
0

Described in responses

Source document

Full report text

This is the full text from the original published report.

Open published report

Concerns and recipient responses

Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

Report evidence summary

Concerns raised2

  1. Failure to complete pre-discharge risk assessments
    Part of recurring concern: Unreliable hospital discharge processes
  2. Inadequacy of discharge summaries for ongoing care risk assessments
    Part of recurring concern: Unreliable hospital discharge processes
Responses linked to these concerns

Each statement is shown once, even when linked to more than one concern.

Respondent positions A position is what a recipient says about a concern when it does not describe a specific action.1

  1. Position

    Relevant frailty and mobility information is provided through the TARF, which was appropriately completed and submitted for social care risk assessment.

    Stated by Hull University Teaching Hospitals NHS TrustDisputes the concernThe respondent disagreed with part of the concern or the basis for it.

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to complete pre-discharge risk assessments

Wider context from the report

“3. Prior to this incident occurring Mrs White had been in hospital and discharged on 4th October 2023. A manager for the care home outlined that the paperwork provided to carers known as the “Discharge Summary” is often inadequate in providing suitable information. In this instance I was informed it did not provide any information on Mrs White’s increased frailty and decreased mobility. This means that information provided is inappropriate for ongoing risk assessments. 4. The manager did outline a particular form that they prefer, I make no comment regarding the format of the information required, merely the need for appropriate information to allow risk assessments to take place. 5. The manager stated that a social worker should be completing a risk assessment prior to discharge but this often does not happen. In many cases a doctor or another member of staff will complete a discharge summary. The information in these is often lacking to safeguard the welfare of the person concern with regard to their care needs. The manager stated they often have to alert safeguarding at the local authority of the deficit. 6. Bearing in mind the importance of a discharge summary in providing the foundation information for the ongoing safe care of patients as they leave the hospital environment, this is an issue where either a structured approach is required or training to those who are failing to complete them correctly is required. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Unreliable hospital discharge processes.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Inadequacy of discharge summaries for ongoing care risk assessments

Wider context from the report

“3. Prior to this incident occurring Mrs White had been in hospital and discharged on 4th October 2023. A manager for the care home outlined that the paperwork provided to carers known as the “Discharge Summary” is often inadequate in providing suitable information. In this instance I was informed it did not provide any information on Mrs White’s increased frailty and decreased mobility. This means that information provided is inappropriate for ongoing risk assessments. 4. The manager did outline a particular form that they prefer, I make no comment regarding the format of the information required, merely the need for appropriate information to allow risk assessments to take place. 5. The manager stated that a social worker should be completing a risk assessment prior to discharge but this often does not happen. In many cases a doctor or another member of staff will complete a discharge summary. The information in these is often lacking to safeguard the welfare of the person concern with regard to their care needs. The manager stated they often have to alert safeguarding at the local authority of the deficit. 6. Bearing in mind the importance of a discharge summary in providing the foundation information for the ongoing safe care of patients as they leave the hospital environment, this is an issue where either a structured approach is required or training to those who are failing to complete them correctly is required. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Unreliable hospital discharge processes.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Relevant frailty and mobility information is provided through the TARF, which was appropriately completed and submitted for social care risk assessment.

Verbatim wording from the response

“explained in the course of the inquest. Information regarding a patient’s frailty and mobility is detailed in a form known as a Trusted Assessor Referral Form (TARF) not the patient’s discharge summary, as suggested by the Care Manager. This form is sent from the hospital to the Local Authority, who risk assess the patient’s needs within the community. Trusted Assessor schemes are a national initiative designed to reduce delays when patients are ready for discharge from hospital. This approach allows adult social care providers to adopt and use assessments carried out while patients are still in hospital, promoting safe and timely discharges.”

Source location

Response from Hull University Teaching Hospitals
Page 2 · response
Published 12 February 2024

Open published response
Back to top

Information checked against the published report and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Official responses located
1/1

Data last updated 7 September 2026