Phyllis Christina Hart · Prevention of Future Deaths report

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

Issued 16 Feb 2024•Staffordshire and Stoke-on-Trent

Published report and response evidence

This report’s concerns and statements found in recipients’ published responses. Statements are included even where no link to an individual concern is recorded. A link shows an evidence connection; it does not assign responsibility.

View original report
Concerns
1

Raised in this report

Recipients
1

Named on the report

Responses found
1

Of 1 recipient

Stated actions
1

Described in responses

Recipients and published responses

Full report text

This is the full text from the original published report.

Open published report

Concerns and recipient responses

Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

Report evidence summary

Concerns raised1

  1. Unavailability of an on-site vascular team when urgent vascular opinion is required

Stated actions An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.1

  1. University Hospitals of North Midlands NHS Trust

    Convey to County Hospital wards and clinicians that vascular team support is always available for urgent contact.

Respondent positions A position is what a recipient says about a concern when it does not describe a specific action.1

  1. University Hospitals of North Midlands NHS Trust

    Existing 24/7 on-call coverage and regular vascular presence are relied on to address concerns about urgent vascular review at County Hospital.

    Existing arrangements considered sufficientThe respondent said that existing arrangements were sufficient, so no further action was needed.

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Unavailability of an on-site vascular team when urgent vascular opinion is required

Wider context from the report

“1. There is no vascular team in hand at the County Hospital in Stafford, were urgent Vascular opinion required. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

No recurring-concern membership is currently published.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Convey to County Hospital wards and clinicians that vascular team support is always available for urgent contact.

Verbatim wording from the response

“We will ensure that this information is further conveyed to the wards and clinicians at County Hospital so that they understand that there is always someone from the vascular team to contact, should the need arise.”

Source location

Response from University Hospitals of North Midlands
Page 2 · response
Published 21 October 2024

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Existing 24/7 on-call coverage and regular vascular presence are relied on to address concerns about urgent vascular review at County Hospital.

Verbatim wording from the response

“1. Our vascular lead has reviewed the concern that you have raised, and we are able to confirm that UHNM provides a 24/7 vascular on-call service which is based at the Royal Stoke Hospital site.”

Source location

Response from University Hospitals of North Midlands
Page 2 · response
Published 21 October 2024

Open published response
Back to top

Information checked against the published report and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Official responses located
1/1

Data last updated 7 September 2026