Jennifer Withey · Prevention of Future Deaths report

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

Issued 3 Jul 2019•Cornwall and Isles of Scilly

Published report and response evidence

This report’s concerns and statements found in recipients’ published responses. Statements are included even where no link to an individual concern is recorded. A link shows an evidence connection; it does not assign responsibility.

View original report
Concerns
2

Raised in this report

Recipients
2

Named on the report

Responses found
1

Of 2 recipients

Stated actions
6

Described in responses

Full report text

This is the full text from the original published report.

Open published report

Concerns and recipient responses

Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

Report evidence summary

Concerns raised2

  1. Failure of the free text box to generate automatic red flags from identified symptoms
    Part of recurring concern: Failure to recognise and respond promptly to suspected meningitisPart of recurring concern: Failure to reliably recognise and respond promptly to sepsis
  2. Separate organisational time limits causing avoidable delay in the patient pathway

Stated actions An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.6

  1. NHS England

    Implement national Integrated Urgent Care key performance indicators across organisations in the patient pathway.

  2. NHS England

    Replace locally measured out-of-hours standards with Integrated Urgent Care key performance indicators applying to NHS 111 and out-of-hours organisations.

  3. NHS England

    Continue improving patient pathways to deliver appropriate, effective and seamless healthcare.

  4. NHS England

    Establish data collections to measure and monitor Integrated Urgent Care key performance indicators.

  5. NHS England

    Implement critical-illness enhancements, including qSOFA and functional-impairment questions, across NHS Pathways algorithms.

  6. NHS England

    Maintain symptom questions that identify serious illness, including rash and meningitis indicators, and trigger emergency ambulance dispatch.

Respondent positions A position is what a recipient says about a concern when it does not describe a specific action.4

  1. NHS England

    NHS Digital is responsible for delivering NHS Pathways and its Directory of Service clinical decision tool.

    Redirects responsibilityThe respondent said that another organisation was responsible for deciding or taking action.
  2. NHS England

    NHS Digital’s separate response is considered to cover and answer all specific NHS Pathways recommendations.

    Existing arrangements considered sufficientThe respondent said that existing arrangements were sufficient, so no further action was needed.
  3. NHS England

    Free-text analysis cannot safely be introduced because sufficient expertise and evidence do not currently exist; developing technology remains under review.

    Unable to actThe respondent said that a constraint prevented them from taking the relevant action.
  4. NHS England

    National or locally commissioned performance indicators are a matter for NHS England, which should address the concern.

    Redirects responsibilityThe respondent said that another organisation was responsible for deciding or taking action.

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure of the free text box to generate automatic red flags from identified symptoms

Wider context from the report

“A) The free text box could be set up so that identified symptoms, where appropriate, could generate an automatic red flag. By way of illustration, a non-blanching rash could automatically justify immediate hospital admission by ambulance in a case of suspected meningitis. Similarly, in this case, where a number of sepsis indicators were present, a red flag could have been raised requiring the call adviser specifically to consider a sepsis pathway. This would act as a second level of security, the first step being to allocate a patient to a correct pathway in the first instance. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Failure to recognise and respond promptly to suspected meningitis; Failure to reliably recognise and respond promptly to sepsis.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Separate organisational time limits causing avoidable delay in the patient pathway

Wider context from the report

“B) is it possible to establish a single patient orientated pathway with a key performance indicator of, for example, ‘patient to be seen within two hours’ rather than two separate time limits for two or more organisations (here, 111 and Cornwall Health) which cumulatively introduces unnecessary and avoidable delay into the process. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

No recurring-concern membership is currently published.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Implement national Integrated Urgent Care key performance indicators across organisations in the patient pathway.

Verbatim wording from the response

“With regard to a single patient-oriented pathway within NHS 111 services, NHS England has a set of national Key Performance Indicators (KPI) which measure the performance of this service. In the past, these KPIs only applied to the NHS 111 call receiving organisations, with other organisations in the patient pathway not monitored.”

Source location

2019-0225-Response-by-NHS-England
Page 2 · response
Published 13 September 2019

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Replace locally measured out-of-hours standards with Integrated Urgent Care key performance indicators applying to NHS 111 and out-of-hours organisations.

Verbatim wording from the response

“In addition, since October 2018 we have updated and replaced the standards by which Out-of-hours organisations are measured, (The ‘National Quality Requirements), with the IUC KPIs. Previously these standards were only ever locally measured, but now both NHS 111 organisations and Out-of-hours organisations need to comply with the same IUC KPIs.”

Source location

2019-0225-Response-by-NHS-England
Page 2 · response
Published 13 September 2019

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Continue improving patient pathways to deliver appropriate, effective and seamless healthcare.

Verbatim wording from the response

“We remain focused on resolving a patient’s care needs as early as possible and continue to work to improve patient pathways to deliver appropriate, effective and seamless healthcare within the NHS.”

Source location

2019-0225-Response-by-NHS-England
Page 3 · response
Published 13 September 2019

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Establish data collections to measure and monitor Integrated Urgent Care key performance indicators.

Verbatim wording from the response

“However, this limitation was identified and in July 2018 a new set of national Integrated Urgent Care (IUC) KPIs was introduced alongside the existing KPIs with the intention to remove the disconnect between organisations. This is also supported by new data collections which commenced in January 2019 to measure and monitor KPIs.”

Source location

2019-0225-Response-by-NHS-England
Page 2 · response
Published 13 September 2019

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Implement critical-illness enhancements, including qSOFA and functional-impairment questions, across NHS Pathways algorithms.

Verbatim wording from the response

“NHS Pathways, as part of its routine monitoring and evaluation process, made enhancements to better identify those who are critically ill and at risk of sepsis in release 15. Widescale deployment of release 15 to all providers of NHS111 and all ambulance services in England that use the NHS Pathways system was 4th May 2018, with services then having an 8-week period to update their staff and deploy in their systems.”

Source location

2019-0225-Response-by-NHS-Digital
Page 7 · response
Published 13 September 2019

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Maintain symptom questions that identify serious illness, including rash and meningitis indicators, and trigger emergency ambulance dispatch.

Verbatim wording from the response

“In addition to the above critical ill enhancements across all our relevant symptom algorithms, NHS Pathways has always asked the following questions in the relevant pathways (as these are potentially indicative of septicaemia rash and meningitis). These questions are asked if a positive answer has already indicated that the caller is functionally impaired:”

Source location

2019-0225-Response-by-NHS-Digital
Page 8 · response
Published 13 September 2019

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

NHS Digital is responsible for delivering NHS Pathways and its Directory of Service clinical decision tool.

Verbatim wording from the response

“NHS Digital is responsible for the delivery of NHS Pathways and the ‘Directory of Service’ which is a clinical decision tool. Together this system is used throughout England and underpins how the public access all urgent and emergency care”

Source location

2019-0225-Response-by-NHS-England
Page 1 · response
Published 13 September 2019

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

NHS Digital’s separate response is considered to cover and answer all specific NHS Pathways recommendations.

Verbatim wording from the response

“As mentioned earlier, I note that NHS Digital has already responded separately to you on the specific NHS Pathways recommendations in your referral and I am content that its response suitably covers, and answers, all of the issues you raised.”

Source location

2019-0225-Response-by-NHS-England
Page 2 · response
Published 13 September 2019

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Free-text analysis cannot safely be introduced because sufficient expertise and evidence do not currently exist; developing technology remains under review.

Verbatim wording from the response

“• It may be in time that technology, natural language processing and artificial intelligence develop such that free text analysis of this nature can successfully be deployed but NHS Pathways do not consider that sufficient expertise or evidence exists currently to safely introduce such a feature. Use of developing technology is something that remains under constant review in NHS Pathways.”

Source location

2019-0225-Response-by-NHS-Digital
Page 5 · response
Published 13 September 2019

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

National or locally commissioned performance indicators are a matter for NHS England, which should address the concern.

Verbatim wording from the response

“In respect of the concern raised at paragraph 5B of the Regulation 28 Report I can confirm that NHS Digital cannot comment on national or locally commissioned performance indicators and this concern should be addressed to NHS England.”

Source location

2019-0225-Response-by-NHS-Digital
Page 9 · response
Published 13 September 2019

Open published response
Back to top

Information checked against the published report and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Official responses located
1/2

Data last updated 7 September 2026