PFD report

Aniyah Jasmine Winston · Prevention of Future Deaths report

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

Issued 25 Jul 2018•Manchester South

Report record

Published report and response evidence

This page connects the concerns raised in this report with statements found in recipients’ published responses. A link shows a clear evidence connection; it does not assign responsibility.

View original report
Concerns
2

Raised in this report

Recipients
2

Named on the report

Responses found
1

Of 2 recipients

Stated actions
1

Described in responses

Source document

Full report text

This is the full text from the original published report.

Open published report

Concerns and recipient responses

Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

Report evidence summary

Concerns raised2

  1. Failure of multidisciplinary team members to challenge incorrect clinical decisions
    Part of recurring concern: Failure to enable professional challenge of clinical decisionsPart of recurring concern: Failure to maintain an open and accountable safety culturePart of recurring concern: Unreliable governance and accountability of multidisciplinary team decisions
  2. Lack of routine pre-delivery scanning for breech presentation
    Part of recurring concern: Failure to provide individualised pregnancy and birth risk assessment and planning
Responses linked to these concerns

Each statement is shown once, even when linked to more than one concern.

Respondent positions A position is what a recipient says about a concern when it does not describe a specific action.1

  1. Position

    Routine third-trimester scans are not recommended because no evidence supports them; lack of equipment or training is not the reason they are absent.

    Stated by Department of Health and Social CareDisputes the concernThe respondent disagreed with part of the concern or the basis for it.

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure of multidisciplinary team members to challenge incorrect clinical decisions

Wider context from the report

“2. The inquest was told by a number of medical professionals involved in Aniyah's birth that they whilst they felt the decision to give Syntocinon was incorrect they did not feel comfortable challenging the decision. The expert instructed was clear that at the time it was given it should not have been. The Trust has since the death of Aniyah put in place a detailed programme to improve confidence in challenging decision-making within a MDT setting. However the extent of recognition of the issue and steps to counter it nationally were unclear. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Failure to enable professional challenge of clinical decisions; Failure to maintain an open and accountable safety culture; Unreliable governance and accountability of multidisciplinary team decisions.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Lack of routine pre-delivery scanning for breech presentation

Wider context from the report

“1. The inquest heard that Aniyah was an undetected breech birth. By the time it was identified she was breech her mother was fully dilated. The inquest heard that there are undetected breech births are not uncommon and present particular challenges for those involved in care during labour. The inquest was told that it is the case that pre delivery scans are not routinely carried out to try and reduce the number of undetected breeches and midwives/doctors rely on external examination. The inquest was told that this is due to availability of scanning facilities and training to utilise the scanners. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Failure to provide individualised pregnancy and birth risk assessment and planning.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Routine third-trimester scans are not recommended because no evidence supports them; lack of equipment or training is not the reason they are absent.

Verbatim wording from the response

“On the first matter of concern, I can confirm that it is not the case that a lack of equipment or training accounts for a lack of pre-delivery scans to detect fetal malpresentation. Rather, it is that there is currently no evidence base to recommend routine third trimester scanning.”

Source location

2018-0241-Response-by-Department-of-Halth-Social-Care
Page 1 · response
Published 23 September 2018

Open published response

Other statements in published responses

These actions and other statements could not be clearly connected to one concern in this report.

Recipient-stated actions An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.1

  1. 1

    Provide additional funding over three years to support the Royal Colleges’ launch of the Each Baby Counts Learn and Support programme.

    Stated by Department of Health and Social CareStated in progressThe respondent said that this action was in progress when they made their response on 23 September 2018.

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Provide additional funding over three years to support the Royal Colleges’ launch of the Each Baby Counts Learn and Support programme.

Verbatim wording from the response

“The Department is also providing additional funding over the next three years to provide support for the RCOG and the Royal College of Midwives to launch ‘Each Baby Counts Learn and Support’⁴ - a programme of work to enable greater collaboration between the Royal Colleges and the NHS via the Maternal and Neonatal Health Safety Collaborative - this aims to align quality and safety improvement, multi-professional learning and clinical leadership into a consistent and sustainable safety strategy across the system.”

Source location

2018-0241-Response-by-Department-of-Halth-Social-Care
Page 4 · response
Published 23 September 2018

Open published response
Back to top

Information checked against the published report and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Official responses located
1/2

Data last updated 7 September 2026