PFD report

Harold Mullins · Prevention of Future Deaths report

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

Issued 20 Apr 2017•South Wales Central

Report record

Published report and response evidence

This page connects the concerns raised in this report with statements found in recipients’ published responses. A link shows a clear evidence connection; it does not assign responsibility.

View original report
Concerns
3

Raised in this report

Recipients
1

Named on the report

Responses found
0

Of 1 recipient

Stated actions
0

Described in responses

Source document

Full report text

This is the full text from the original published report.

Open published report

Concerns and recipient responses

Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

Report evidence summary

Concerns raised3

  1. Failure to appropriately escalate care in response to deteriorating NEWS scores
    Part of recurring concern: Failure to reliably recognise and respond to acute clinical deteriorationPart of recurring concern: Failure to take timely escalation action when safety thresholds are breachedPart of recurring concern: Unreliable clinical Early Warning Score systems for deteriorationPart of recurring concern: Unreliable escalation of abnormal clinical observations
  2. Failure to ensure surgical teams are aware of patients' history of deep vein thrombosis
  3. Delays in clinical review of patients with deteriorating NEWS scores
    Part of recurring concern: Failure to conduct timely, appropriate clinical assessmentsPart of recurring concern: Failure to reliably recognise and respond to acute clinical deteriorationPart of recurring concern: Unreliable clinical Early Warning Score systems for deteriorationPart of recurring concern: Unreliable escalation of abnormal clinical observations
Responses linked to these concerns

Each statement is shown once, even when linked to more than one concern.

No linked response statements

No respondent-stated action or position is clearly linked to these concerns.

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to appropriately escalate care in response to deteriorating NEWS scores

Wider context from the report

“(1) A review of the care that was received by Mr Mullins revealed that the surgical team were unaware of his history of deep vein thrombosis when undertaking the surgery and caring for him in general. (2) Despite a deteriorating position in relation to his observations (NEWS scores) he was not seen by a clinician in a timely fashion. There appears to be a difficulty in patients being seen in these circumstances appropriately by clinical staff which is a concern given that the purpose of the NEWS score system is to escalate care in cases of deterioration. It is a concern that the clinician contacted initially when the NEWS scores were deteriorating indicated that this was not to be expected given that he had undergone surgery. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Failure to reliably recognise and respond to acute clinical deterioration; Failure to take timely escalation action when safety thresholds are breached; Unreliable clinical Early Warning Score systems for deterioration; Unreliable escalation of abnormal clinical observations.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to ensure surgical teams are aware of patients' history of deep vein thrombosis

Wider context from the report

“(1) A review of the care that was received by Mr Mullins revealed that the surgical team were unaware of his history of deep vein thrombosis when undertaking the surgery and caring for him in general. (2) Despite a deteriorating position in relation to his observations (NEWS scores) he was not seen by a clinician in a timely fashion. There appears to be a difficulty in patients being seen in these circumstances appropriately by clinical staff which is a concern given that the purpose of the NEWS score system is to escalate care in cases of deterioration. It is a concern that the clinician contacted initially when the NEWS scores were deteriorating indicated that this was not to be expected given that he had undergone surgery. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

No recurring-concern membership is currently published.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Delays in clinical review of patients with deteriorating NEWS scores

Wider context from the report

“(1) A review of the care that was received by Mr Mullins revealed that the surgical team were unaware of his history of deep vein thrombosis when undertaking the surgery and caring for him in general. (2) Despite a deteriorating position in relation to his observations (NEWS scores) he was not seen by a clinician in a timely fashion. There appears to be a difficulty in patients being seen in these circumstances appropriately by clinical staff which is a concern given that the purpose of the NEWS score system is to escalate care in cases of deterioration. It is a concern that the clinician contacted initially when the NEWS scores were deteriorating indicated that this was not to be expected given that he had undergone surgery. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Failure to conduct timely, appropriate clinical assessments; Failure to reliably recognise and respond to acute clinical deterioration; Unreliable clinical Early Warning Score systems for deterioration; Unreliable escalation of abnormal clinical observations.

Open source report
Back to top

Information checked against the published report and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Official responses located
0/1

Data last updated 7 September 2026

No official response is included in the current published snapshot.