PFD report

JOHN HENRY WILSHER · Prevention of Future Deaths report

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

Issued 5 Aug 2014•Norfolk

Report record

Published report and response evidence

This page connects the concerns raised in this report with statements found in recipients’ published responses. A link shows a clear evidence connection; it does not assign responsibility.

View original report
Concerns
4

Raised in this report

Recipients
3

Named on the report

Responses found
2

Of 3 recipients

Stated actions
7

Described in responses

Source document

Full report text

This is the full text from the original published report.

Open published report

Concerns and recipient responses

Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

Report evidence summary

Concerns raised4

  1. Failure to communicate concerns about care home adequacy
    Part of recurring concern: Incomplete and unreliable information about carers and care arrangementsPart of recurring concern: Unreliable inter-agency information sharing for coordinated care
  2. Delays in NCC Community Services assessments
    Part of recurring concern: Untimely or incomplete community care assessments
  3. Unavailability of nursing assessment outcomes during community services assessments
Responses linked to these concerns

Each statement is shown once, even when linked to more than one concern.

Actions described in response An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.7

  1. Action

    Continue working with the hospital to support safe discharges for older people returning to residential homes.

    Stated by Norfolk County Council Community ServicesStated in progressThe respondent said that this action was in progress when they made their response on 5 August 2014.
  2. Action

    Embed feedback to safeguarding referrers as an integral part of the safeguarding process.

    Stated by Norfolk County Council Community ServicesStated in progressThe respondent said that this action was in progress when they made their response on 5 August 2014.
  3. Action

    Change the training programme supporting use of discharge letter templates.

    Stated by Norfolk and Norwich University Hospitals NHS Foundation TrustStated in progressThe respondent said that this action was in progress when they made their response on 5 August 2014.

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to communicate concerns about care home adequacy

Wider context from the report

“(2) Concerns were raised by the GP and a referral made to NCC Community Services on 25 November 2013 as to the suitability of the Care Home in providing care to Mr Wilsher due to his deteriorating condition. He was admitted to NNUH on 27 November 2013 for assessment and plans were made for discharge to the Care Home. Neither NNUH nor the Care Home were aware concerns had already been raised (prior to a further deterioration in his condition) as to the adequacy of the Care Home to cope with his needs. On Mr Wilsher’s discharge to the Care Home it quickly became apparent they could not cope with his needs. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Incomplete and unreliable information about carers and care arrangements; Unreliable inter-agency information sharing for coordinated care.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Delays in NCC Community Services assessments

Wider context from the report

“(3) An assessment was carried out by NCC Community Services on 13 December 2013 by which time Mr Wilsher had been admitted to NNUH and discharged and plans were already in place for his transfer to a nursing home. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Untimely or incomplete community care assessments.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Unavailability of nursing assessment outcomes during community services assessments

Wider context from the report

“(4) The outcome of the Nursing Assessment carried out on 10 December 2013 was not available at the time of the Community Services Assessment. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

No recurring-concern membership is currently published.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Inaccurate information in NNUH discharge letters

Wider context from the report

“(1) The information contained in the NNUH Discharge Letter is inaccurate; ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Unreliable hospital discharge processes.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Continue working with the hospital to support safe discharges for older people returning to residential homes.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Norfolk County Council Community Services continues to work closely with the Norfolk & Norwich Community Hospital to ensure safe discharges are made. There are social care practitioners linked to those Wards which care for older people who, if requested, are available to support any health staff who are directly in contact with residential home managers and staff.”

Source location

2014-0360-Response-by-Norfolk-County-Council
Page 1 · response
Published 5 August 2014

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Embed feedback to safeguarding referrers as an integral part of the safeguarding process.

Verbatim wording from the response

“I confirm that the importance of giving appropriate feedback to the person who raised the safeguarding concern (the “referrer”) has been acknowledged and it is agreed that this should be an integral part of the safeguarding process. The Multi-Agency Safeguarding Hub (“MASH”) and the safeguarding manager within Norfolk Council have been working with colleagues to ensure this action is embedded in the safeguarding process. This will ensure a more outcome focussed safeguarding process. This will also enable the referrer to be clear when the council has assessed an issue not to fall within the safeguarding arena.”

Source location

2014-0360-Response-by-Norfolk-County-Council
Page 1 · response
Published 5 August 2014

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Change the training programme supporting use of discharge letter templates.

Verbatim wording from the response

“The outcome of that work was presented to our Executive Board at the beginning of September and a series of steps are being put in place to improve the accuracy of discharge information provided to GPs and community services. The aim of these changes is to ensure speedier completion of electronic discharge letters, a more 'rounded' picture of the patient and improved continuity of care. The steps being taken may be summarised as follows:”

Source location

2014-0360-Response-by-Norfolk-Norwich-University-Hospitals-NHS
Page 1 · response
Published 5 August 2014

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Monitor the changes’ effects and assess whether further steps are needed to support safe transfer between hospital and community.

Verbatim wording from the response

“We will continue to monitor the effect of the changes outlined above and whether any further steps are necessary to promote the safe transfer of care between hospital and community.”

Source location

2014-0360-Response-by-Norfolk-Norwich-University-Hospitals-NHS
Page 1 · response
Published 5 August 2014

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Create a bespoke discharge letter template for Older People’s Medicine patients with relevant clinical fields.

Verbatim wording from the response

“The outcome of that work was presented to our Executive Board at the beginning of September and a series of steps are being put in place to improve the accuracy of discharge information provided to GPs and community services. The aim of these changes is to ensure speedier completion of electronic discharge letters, a more 'rounded' picture of the patient and improved continuity of care. The steps being taken may be summarised as follows:”

Source location

2014-0360-Response-by-Norfolk-Norwich-University-Hospitals-NHS
Page 1 · response
Published 5 August 2014

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Revise clinician prompts for completing discharge letters to ensure inclusion of relevant information.

Verbatim wording from the response

“The outcome of that work was presented to our Executive Board at the beginning of September and a series of steps are being put in place to improve the accuracy of discharge information provided to GPs and community services. The aim of these changes is to ensure speedier completion of electronic discharge letters, a more 'rounded' picture of the patient and improved continuity of care. The steps being taken may be summarised as follows:”

Source location

2014-0360-Response-by-Norfolk-Norwich-University-Hospitals-NHS
Page 1 · response
Published 5 August 2014

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Revise the discharge letter template to simplify completion and emphasise critical information.

Verbatim wording from the response

“The outcome of that work was presented to our Executive Board at the beginning of September and a series of steps are being put in place to improve the accuracy of discharge information provided to GPs and community services. The aim of these changes is to ensure speedier completion of electronic discharge letters, a more 'rounded' picture of the patient and improved continuity of care. The steps being taken may be summarised as follows:”

Source location

2014-0360-Response-by-Norfolk-Norwich-University-Hospitals-NHS
Page 1 · response
Published 5 August 2014

Open published response
Back to top

Information checked against the published report and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Official responses located
2/3

Data last updated 7 September 2026