PFD report

Joan Margaret Sanderson · Prevention of Future Deaths report

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

Issued 5 Oct 2020•Manchester South

Report record

Published report and response evidence

This page connects the concerns raised in this report with statements found in recipients’ published responses. A link shows a clear evidence connection; it does not assign responsibility.

View original report
Concerns
1

Raised in this report

Recipients
2

Named on the report

Responses found
1

Of 2 recipients

Stated actions
4

Described in responses

Source document

Full report text

This is the full text from the original published report.

Open published report

Concerns and recipient responses

Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

Report evidence summary

Concerns raised1

  1. Failure to routinely swab orthopaedic surgery patients from care homes or with previous positive MRSA results on hospital admission
    Part of recurring concern: Failure to reliably provide required MRSA screening
Responses linked to these concerns

Each statement is shown once, even when linked to more than one concern.

Actions described in response An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.1

  1. Action

    Share learning with infection prevention and control networks for dissemination to provider organisations and consideration of wider regional sharing.

    Stated by NHS Greater Manchester Integrated Care BoardStated plannedThe respondent said that this action was planned when they made their response on 27 November 2020.

Respondent positions A position is what a recipient says about a concern when it does not describe a specific action.2

  1. Position

    Responsibility for addressing the concern about MRSA swabbing requirements is left to HSIB as the named respondent.

    Stated by NHS Greater Manchester Integrated Care BoardRedirects responsibilityThe respondent said that another organisation was responsible for deciding or taking action.

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to routinely swab orthopaedic surgery patients from care homes or with previous positive MRSA results on hospital admission

Wider context from the report

“The inquest heard evidence from the Trust that following her death they had carried out a RCA to understand what learning could be taken from Mrs Sanderson’s death. A key piece of learning was identified, as patients being admitted for orthopaedic surgery, from a care home or those that have had a previous positive MRSA result should have a routine swab sent for MRSA on admission to hospital. In this case a swab was not collected as that was not standard at that time. Surgery would not be held up awaiting the outcome but it would have allowed earlier identification of MRSA which could impact the outcome in another case where emergency surgery is required and there is an infection post operatively. Patients admitted for elective surgery have a MRSA swab collected 12 weeks prior and receive decolonisation treatment for a positive MRSA result prior to surgery. The inquest was told this change had been rolled out in the trust and was seen as wider learning that could prevent future deaths within the NHS. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Failure to reliably provide required MRSA screening.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Share learning with infection prevention and control networks for dissemination to provider organisations and consideration of wider regional sharing.

Verbatim wording from the response

“3. Learning to be shared with the Greater Manchester Infection Prevention and Control Collaborative for members to take into their provider organisations to ensure that national screening guidance is being followed. Findings to be also shared with the Northwest NHS England/Improvement Infection prevention for consideration of sharing across the Northwest”

Source location

2020-0198-Response-from-GM-Health-and-Social-Care-Partnership-and-Healthcare-Safety-Investigation-Branchwillbe.pdf
Page 2 · response
Published 27 November 2020

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Responsibility for addressing the concern about MRSA swabbing requirements is left to HSIB as the named respondent.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Following the inquest you raised concerns in your Regulation 28 Report to NHS England regarding that there was no requirement for MRSA swabbing of patients being admitted for orthopaedic surgery, from a care home or those that have had a previous positive MRSA result. Whilst surgery would not have been delayed awaiting the outcome of the results, it could impact the outcome in another case where emergency surgery is required and there is an infection post-operatively.”

Source location

2020-0198-Response-from-GM-Health-and-Social-Care-Partnership-and-Healthcare-Safety-Investigation-Branchwillbe.pdf
Page 1 · response
Published 27 November 2020

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

HSIB will not investigate because its limited annual investigation capacity requires selecting issues with the greatest potential for new NHS learning.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Following careful consideration, we will not be taking forward an investigation into your concerns. We are only able to undertake a limited number of national investigations each year, and therefore try to focus on those with the most potential for new learning across the NHS. The National Criteria for selection is described on our website: https://www.hsib.org.uk/public-patients/how-we-decide-to-investigate/”

Source location

2020-0198-Response-from-GM-Health-and-Social-Care-Partnership-and-Healthcare-Safety-Investigation-Branchwillbe.pdf
Page 3 · response
Published 27 November 2020

Open published response

Other statements in published responses

These actions and other statements could not be clearly connected to one concern in this report.

Recipient-stated actions An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.3

  1. 1

    Monitor key learning points and recommendations to ensure they become embedded in practice.

    Stated by NHS Greater Manchester Integrated Care BoardStated plannedThe respondent said that this action was planned when they made their response on 27 November 2020.
  2. 2

    Present and share learning with the Greater Manchester Quality Board.

    Stated by NHS Greater Manchester Integrated Care BoardStated plannedThe respondent said that this action was planned when they made their response on 27 November 2020.
  3. 3

    Share learning with Greater Manchester service commissioners for consideration within commissioned services.

    Stated by NHS Greater Manchester Integrated Care BoardStated plannedThe respondent said that this action was planned when they made their response on 27 November 2020.

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Monitor key learning points and recommendations to ensure they become embedded in practice.

Verbatim wording from the response

“The Greater Manchester Health and Social Care Partnership (GMHSCP) is committed to improving outcomes for the population of Greater Manchester. In conclusion key learning points and recommendations will be monitored to ensure they are embedded within practice.”

Source location

2020-0198-Response-from-GM-Health-and-Social-Care-Partnership-and-Healthcare-Safety-Investigation-Branchwillbe.pdf
Page 2 · response
Published 27 November 2020

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Present and share learning with the Greater Manchester Quality Board.

Verbatim wording from the response

“1. Learning to be presented/shared with the Greater Manchester Quality Board. This meeting is attended by commissioners, including commissioners of specialist services, regulators, Healthwatch and NICE.”

Source location

2020-0198-Response-from-GM-Health-and-Social-Care-Partnership-and-Healthcare-Safety-Investigation-Branchwillbe.pdf
Page 2 · response
Published 27 November 2020

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Share learning with Greater Manchester service commissioners for consideration within commissioned services.

Verbatim wording from the response

“2. Learning to be shared with the Greater Manchester commissioners of services to consider the findings of the investigation within the context of the services they commission.”

Source location

2020-0198-Response-from-GM-Health-and-Social-Care-Partnership-and-Healthcare-Safety-Investigation-Branchwillbe.pdf
Page 2 · response
Published 27 November 2020

Open published response
Back to top

Information checked against the published report and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Official responses located
1/2

Data last updated 7 September 2026