PFD report

Dane CHINNERY and 6 others · Prevention of Future Deaths report

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

Issued 28 Sep 2021•South London

Report record

Published report and response evidence

This page connects the concerns raised in this report with statements found in recipients’ published responses. A link shows a clear evidence connection; it does not assign responsibility.

View original report
Concerns
1

Raised in this report

Recipients
6

Named on the report

Responses found
6

Of 6 recipients

Stated actions
40

Described in responses

Source document

Full report text

This is the full text from the original published report.

Open published report

Concerns and recipient responses

Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

Report evidence summary

Concerns raised1

  1. Risk of under-reporting of incidents
Responses linked to these concerns

Each statement is shown once, even when linked to more than one concern.

Actions described in response An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.7

  1. Action

    Monitor developments in anonymous reporting and update documentation accordingly.

    Stated by Light Rail Safety and Standards BoardStated in progressThe respondent said that this action was in progress when they made their response on 14 October 2021.
  2. Action

    Publish documentation, developed with CIRAS, explaining anonymous reporting schemes and their benefits.

    Stated by Light Rail Safety and Standards BoardStated plannedThe respondent said that this action was planned when they made their response on 14 October 2021.
  3. Action

    Continue recording, monitoring and assessing hazardous events and precursors through the national Tram Accident and Incident Reporting database and National Risk Model.

    Stated by Light Rail Safety and Standards BoardStated in progressThe respondent said that this action was in progress when they made their response on 14 October 2021.

Respondent positions A position is what a recipient says about a concern when it does not describe a specific action.2

  1. Position

    LRSSB cannot require light rail operators to join CIRAS or comply with its guidance because adherence is voluntary and licensing conditions do not apply.

    Stated by Light Rail Safety and Standards BoardUnable to actThe respondent said that a constraint prevented them from taking the relevant action.

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Risk of under-reporting of incidents

Wider context from the report

“The risk of under-reporting of incidents ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

No recurring-concern membership is currently published.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Monitor developments in anonymous reporting and update documentation accordingly.

Verbatim wording from the response

“2.5 LRSSB will continue to monitor advancements in this area and will update its documentation accordingly.”

Source location

2021-0337-Response-from-Light-Rail-Safety-and-Standards-Board-Anonymous-reporting-CIRAS_Published
Page 3 · response
Published 14 October 2021

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Publish documentation, developed with CIRAS, explaining anonymous reporting schemes and their benefits.

Verbatim wording from the response

“3.2 In collaboration with CIRAS, LRSSB intends to provide documentation detailing such schemes and their benefits. This documentation is currently in preparatory draft form, but LRSSB expects publication to be before the end of this business year (March 2022).”

Source location

2021-0337-Response-from-Light-Rail-Safety-and-Standards-Board-Anonymous-reporting-CIRAS_Published
Page 3 · response
Published 14 October 2021

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Continue recording, monitoring and assessing hazardous events and precursors through the national Tram Accident and Incident Reporting database and National Risk Model.

Verbatim wording from the response

“3.3 LRSSB continues to record, monitor, and assess hazardous events and their precursors through the national Tram Accident and Incident Reporting database (TAIR). All networks submit data to this LRSSB database. These inputs are then fed through to the LRSSB National Risk Model which provides outputs that identify potential current and future risk to both the UK sector as a whole or an individual network. Using this data LRSSB can then focus attention on any new technology or process required. LRSSB will, by the production of standard / guidance or by research and development seek to mitigate the chance of the identified event occurring. LRSSB believe that the use of this “live” database and its outputs will aid the sector in preventing future serious incidents.”

Source location

2021-0337-Response-from-Light-Rail-Safety-and-Standards-Board-Auto-Braking_Published
Page 3 · response
Published 14 October 2021

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Facilitate staff feedback through union representatives by allocating weekly time for union duties and holding regular management meetings with representatives.

Verbatim wording from the response

“In addition, staff may speak to their union representatives. Time is allocated each week to ensure that union representatives can carry out their union role (which includes liaising with staff regarding any points they wish to raise). We hold regular meetings with union representatives to ensure that management hear feedback reported through the unions.”

Source location

2021-0337-Response-from-Tram-Operations-Ltd_Published
Page 2 · response
Published 14 October 2021

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Maintain membership of CIRAS and provide staff with confidential reporting access through prominently displayed contact details.

Verbatim wording from the response

“I confirm that TOL is a member of CIRAS, an independent not-for-profit confidential reporting service to the transport sector, having joined on 1 May 2017. TOL staff may choose to make a report to CIRAS on a confidential basis.”

Source location

2021-0337-Response-from-Tram-Operations-Ltd_Published
Page 1 · response
Published 14 October 2021

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Provide internal reporting resources through staff suggestion boxes, including weekly checks, regular emptying, written responses and appropriate follow-up.

Verbatim wording from the response

“There have been no recent CIRAS reports but given TOL’s relatively small size this is not unexpected as TOL’s staff have a number of means of raising concerns. In line with our efforts to achieve a just culture, we have put in place resources to encourage internal reporting. By way of a few examples, there are a number of staff suggestion boxes located at our Therapia Lane Depot where staff may drop-off written feedback. The boxes are checked weekly, emptied on a regular basis and we respond in writing to each piece of feedback and take steps where appropriate.”

Source location

2021-0337-Response-from-Tram-Operations-Ltd_Published
Page 2 · response
Published 14 October 2021

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Enable direct staff reporting to senior management through an open-door policy and active encouragement of self-reporting.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Staff may also report directly to senior management. We operate an open door policy and we actively encourage the practice of self-reporting.”

Source location

2021-0337-Response-from-Tram-Operations-Ltd_Published
Page 2 · response
Published 14 October 2021

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

LRSSB cannot require light rail operators to join CIRAS or comply with its guidance because adherence is voluntary and licensing conditions do not apply.

Verbatim wording from the response

“1.6 It should be noted, however, that LRSSB is an organisation that requires voluntary adherence to its guidance and best practice. Unlike the heavy rail industry, light rail operators are not required to be licensed under the Railways Act 1993 and there are therefore no licence conditions requiring membership of LRSSB or compliance with its outputs, however, currently, all seven 2nd generation UK tram networks are members of LRSSB and are actively engaged. While some parts of the Railways Act 1993 do apply to light rail and tramways, significant parts of that Act do not. This reflects the historic policy position that Government has taken under which light rail and tramway systems have generally been more associated with highways provisions rather than the more heavily regulated mainline railways.”

Source location

2021-0337-Response-from-Light-Rail-Safety-and-Standards-Board-Anonymous-reporting-CIRAS_Published
Page 2 · response
Published 14 October 2021

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

All seven UK tramways subscribe to a confidential reporting scheme, understood and confirmed to be CIRAS.

Verbatim wording from the response

“2.2 In the Preventing Future Matters report published by HM Senior Coroner, South London, LRSSB was asked to respond on the topic of Anonymous Reporting. The report details how all tramway operators should look at using CIRAS (or a similar anonymous reporting scheme) and whether such schemes are used and if not, why not.”

Source location

2021-0337-Response-from-Light-Rail-Safety-and-Standards-Board-Anonymous-reporting-CIRAS_Published
Page 2 · response
Published 14 October 2021

Open published response

Other statements in published responses

These actions and other statements could not be clearly connected to one concern in this report.

Recipient-stated actions An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.33

  1. 1

    Engage with tram operators and, where appropriate, the LRSSB on passenger safety issues reported by users.

    Stated by Transport FocusStated plannedThe respondent said that this action was planned when they made their response on 14 October 2021.
  2. 2

    Assess and communicate relevant updates from light-rail networks through LRSSB’s sector communication channels.

    Stated by Light Rail Safety and Standards BoardStated in progressThe respondent said that this action was in progress when they made their response on 14 October 2021.
  3. 3

    Consult TfL and London Trams to establish remedial action taken or reasonably available to address passenger ejection through tram doors.

    Stated by Light Rail Safety and Standards BoardStated plannedThe respondent said that this action was planned when they made their response on 14 October 2021.
  4. 4

    Assess proposed tram-door changes against the holistic risk profile, including effects on driver inattention and speed-management controls.

    Stated by Light Rail Safety and Standards BoardStated plannedThe respondent said that this action was planned when they made their response on 14 October 2021.
  5. 5

    Review the provenance and relevance of standards concerning tram-saloon door security and crashworthiness, including the RAIB technical recommendations.

    Stated by Light Rail Safety and Standards BoardStated in progressThe respondent said that this action was in progress when they made their response on 14 October 2021.
  6. 6

    Continue participating in European and British Standards Institution working groups to influence the design and manufacture of future light-rail fleets.

    Stated by Light Rail Safety and Standards BoardStated in progressThe respondent said that this action was in progress when they made their response on 14 October 2021.
  7. 7

    Continue developing the reference library of light rail safety standards and guidance.

    Stated by Light Rail Safety and Standards BoardStated in progressThe respondent said that this action was in progress when they made their response on 14 October 2021.
  8. 8

    Disseminate CIRAS committee information, reports and analytics to the light rail sector through the Light Rail Heads of Safety Group.

    Stated by Light Rail Safety and Standards BoardStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 14 October 2021.
  9. 9

    Use the London Trams Safety Risk Model to assess risk before and after safety systems and measures are fitted.

    Stated by Transport for LondonStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 14 October 2021.
  10. 10

    Ensure future London Tram fleet procurements meet applicable LRSSB guidance and incorporate learning from the existing-fleet door-strengthening work into door-mechanism specifications.

    Stated by Transport for LondonStated plannedThe respondent said that this action was planned when they made their response on 14 October 2021.
  11. 11

    Determine the appropriate way forward for existing-fleet door improvements, including funding requirements and implementation timelines, after receiving the technical report.

    Stated by Transport for LondonStated plannedThe respondent said that this action was planned when they made their response on 14 October 2021.
  12. 12

    Complete an engineering study assessing whether the CR4000 fleet’s existing door mechanisms can be strengthened and how any identified solution could be rolled out.

    Stated by Transport for LondonStated in progressThe respondent said that this action was in progress when they made their response on 14 October 2021.
  13. 13

    Operate the procured, developed and installed Physical Prevention of Overspeed System at identified high-risk locations to automatically brake overspeeding trams to a controlled stop.

    Stated by Transport for LondonStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 14 October 2021.
  14. 14

    Review recently issued LRSSB guidance and determine whether further work is needed on the existing fleet to comply with it.

    Stated by Transport for LondonStated plannedThe respondent said that this action was planned when they made their response on 14 October 2021.
  15. 15

    Review the published guidance after 12 months and monitor its implementation and supplementary network safety measures.

    Stated by Light Rail Safety and Standards BoardStated plannedThe respondent said that this action was planned when they made their response on 14 October 2021.
  16. 16

    Continue monitoring advancements in automatic braking, driver inattention detection and speed management.

    Stated by Light Rail Safety and Standards BoardStated in progressThe respondent said that this action was in progress when they made their response on 14 October 2021.
  17. 17

    Continue developing the light rail safety and standards reference library.

    Stated by Light Rail Safety and Standards BoardStated in progressThe respondent said that this action was in progress when they made their response on 14 October 2021.
  18. 18

    Use risk-model outputs to identify required technologies or processes and seek to mitigate identified events through standards, guidance or research and development.

    Stated by Light Rail Safety and Standards BoardStated in progressThe respondent said that this action was in progress when they made their response on 14 October 2021.
  19. 19

    Publish guidance on detecting driver inattention and managing tram speed.

    Stated by Light Rail Safety and Standards BoardStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 14 October 2021.
  20. 20

    Commission and undertake research and development trials of obstacle detection and avoidance systems for light rail vehicles.

    Stated by Light Rail Safety and Standards BoardStated in progressThe respondent said that this action was in progress when they made their response on 14 October 2021.
  21. 21

    Continue monitoring LRSSB’s progress on tram-door standards and work with LRSSB and the sector as standards decisions develop.

    Stated by Department for TransportStated in progressThe respondent said that this action was in progress when they made their response on 14 October 2021.
  22. 22

    Consult passenger groups, system operators and stakeholders on coordinating a nationwide process for passengers to raise tram safety concerns.

    Stated by Department for TransportStated in progressThe respondent said that this action was in progress when they made their response on 14 October 2021.
  23. 23

    Agree a nationwide solution with Transport Focus, LRSSB and other stakeholders for raising passenger safety concerns in 2022.

    Stated by Department for TransportStated plannedThe respondent said that this action was planned when they made their response on 14 October 2021.
  24. 24

    Continue working with UK Tram, LRSSB, system operators and stakeholders to address concerns raised in the Prevention of Future Deaths reports.

    Stated by Department for TransportStated in progressThe respondent said that this action was in progress when they made their response on 14 October 2021.
  25. 25

    Conduct a collaborative engineering assessment of in-service CR4000 doors, including detailed physical assessment and failure analyses, to identify strengthening options.

    Stated by Alstom Engineering And Services LimitedStated in progressThe respondent said that this action was in progress when they made their response on 14 October 2021.
  26. 26

    Consult approved door suppliers and relevant stakeholders on the feasibility of improved future door designs.

    Stated by Alstom Engineering And Services LimitedStated plannedThe respondent said that this action was planned when they made their response on 14 October 2021.
  27. 27

    Establish and communicate recommendations for applicable improvements to existing CR4000 fleets.

    Stated by Alstom Engineering And Services LimitedStated plannedThe respondent said that this action was planned when they made their response on 14 October 2021.
  28. 28

    Engage relevant authorities and standards bodies to review UK light-rail door regulation and, if necessary, recommend revisions.

    Stated by Alstom Engineering And Services LimitedStated plannedThe respondent said that this action was planned when they made their response on 14 October 2021.
  29. 29

    Assemble an international multidisciplinary team to investigate feasible changes to current and future tram-door designs.

    Stated by Alstom Engineering And Services LimitedStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 14 October 2021.
  30. 30

    Share recommendations for current in-service CR4000 doors with vehicle owners.

    Stated by Alstom Engineering And Services LimitedStated plannedThe respondent said that this action was planned when they made their response on 14 October 2021.
  31. 31

    Present the findings of the door-strengthening and feasibility studies to the Senior Coroner, including the industry perspective and regulatory recommendations.

    Stated by Alstom Engineering And Services LimitedStated plannedThe respondent said that this action was planned when they made their response on 14 October 2021.
  32. 32

    Continue discussions with IFE on strengthening current doors and developing future door-design standards.

    Stated by Alstom Engineering And Services LimitedStated in progressThe respondent said that this action was in progress when they made their response on 14 October 2021.
  33. 33

    Review future tram-door designs and establish recommendations for applicable improvements to new-build and future fleets.

    Stated by Alstom Engineering And Services LimitedStated plannedThe respondent said that this action was planned when they made their response on 14 October 2021.

Recipient positions A position is what a recipient says about a concern when they do not describe a specific action.9

  1. 1

    Transport Focus lacks the remit and resources to initiate a bespoke tram passenger safety group.

    Stated by Transport FocusUnable to actThe respondent said that a constraint prevented them from taking the relevant action.
  2. 2

    London TravelWatch is not a dedicated passenger safety group and therefore cannot serve as a model for the proposed national group.

    Stated by Transport FocusDisputes the concernThe respondent disagreed with part of the concern or the basis for it.
  3. 3

    The amount of responsive work LRSSB can undertake depends directly on its Department for Transport funding settlement, which is not guaranteed beyond August 2022.

    Stated by Light Rail Safety and Standards BoardUnable to actThe respondent said that a constraint prevented them from taking the relevant action.
  4. 4

    Existing driver-inattention and speed-management guidance and implementation should significantly reduce the risk of a similar occurrence.

    Stated by Light Rail Safety and Standards BoardExisting arrangements considered sufficientThe respondent said that existing arrangements were sufficient, so no further action was needed.
  5. 5

    Individual tram networks are responsible for developing and finalising system-specific driver-inattention and speed-monitoring risk controls.

    Stated by Light Rail Safety and Standards BoardRedirects responsibilityThe respondent said that another organisation was responsible for deciding or taking action.
  6. 6

    The centrally funded national passenger safety group and automatic braking issues were not addressed to tram operators, so no commentary is provided.

    Stated by Tram Operations LtdOutside remitThe respondent said that this matter was outside its role or authority.
  7. 7

    The operator does not own the trams or have authority to implement tram-door adaptations.

    Stated by Tram Operations LtdUnable to actThe respondent said that a constraint prevented them from taking the relevant action.
  8. 8

    London Trams, together with tram manufacturers, holds the ultimate decision on adapting Croydon Tramlink tram doors.

    Stated by Tram Operations LtdRedirects responsibilityThe respondent said that another organisation was responsible for deciding or taking action.
  9. 9

    Relevant authorities and regulators are responsible for establishing or specifying safety standards; recommendations may be adopted or mandated by them.

    Stated by Alstom Engineering And Services LimitedRedirects responsibilityThe respondent said that another organisation was responsible for deciding or taking action.

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Engage with tram operators and, where appropriate, the LRSSB on passenger safety issues reported by users.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Transport Focus has neither the remit nor the resources to initiate the creation of a bespoke “tram passenger safety group” itself, but – together with our colleagues at London TravelWatch – we will engage with the tram service operators (and/or LRSSB, as appropriate) in relation to any passenger safety issues brought to our notice by users. And if the formation of a group of the kind you envisage is initiated under the auspices of any other body, we will certainly seek to facilitate and support it to the best of our ability.”

Source location

2021-0337-Response-from-Transport-Focus_Published
Page 3 · response
Published 14 October 2021

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Assess and communicate relevant updates from light-rail networks through LRSSB’s sector communication channels.

Verbatim wording from the response

“2.6 LRSSB is also monitoring any advancements made in this area by TfL / London Trams with their manufacturer. If positive action is taken, then LRSSB will use its communication channels to ensure that the sector is fully briefed. Likewise, LRSSB regularly meets with the sector and will ensure that updates to and from the networks are assessed and communicated out accordingly.”

Source location

2021-0337-Response-from-Light-Rail-Safety-and-Standards-Board-Doors_Published
Page 3 · response
Published 14 October 2021

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Consult TfL and London Trams to establish remedial action taken or reasonably available to address passenger ejection through tram doors.

Verbatim wording from the response

“3.3 LRSSB will consult with TfL / London Trams to ascertain what remedial action have or can be reasonably taken to address this issue. LRSSB would then publish a briefing or guidance note as to what the sector should be considering. At this time LRSSB are unsure of the timelines for this work but will report back to HM Coroner South London as soon as these have been finalised.”

Source location

2021-0337-Response-from-Light-Rail-Safety-and-Standards-Board-Doors_Published
Page 3 · response
Published 14 October 2021

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Assess proposed tram-door changes against the holistic risk profile, including effects on driver inattention and speed-management controls.

Verbatim wording from the response

“3.1 Whilst the status of some of RAIB’s recommendations remain ‘implementation on-going’, significant progress continues to be made within the sector. It is important to ensure clarity of progress and conclusions should not be rushed where possible to avoid producing sub-optimal conclusions in the longer term. LRSSB will look at any proposed changes to doors with a view to the holistic risk profile. For instance, the optimisation of driver inattention and speed management systems should prevent the risk of topple due to excessive speed.”

Source location

2021-0337-Response-from-Light-Rail-Safety-and-Standards-Board-Doors_Published
Page 3 · response
Published 14 October 2021

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Review the provenance and relevance of standards concerning tram-saloon door security and crashworthiness, including the RAIB technical recommendations.

Verbatim wording from the response

“2.4 There are many standards applicable to the construction of a metro or tram car. LRSSB is reviewing the provenance and relevance of those pertinent to this issue. Currently one of the committees LRSSB sits on is RAE/001/0-18 Railway applications - Interior passive safety BSi eCommittee. Amongst topics being considered are metro”

Source location

2021-0337-Response-from-Light-Rail-Safety-and-Standards-Board-Doors_Published
Page 2 · response
Published 14 October 2021

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Continue participating in European and British Standards Institution working groups to influence the design and manufacture of future light-rail fleets.

Verbatim wording from the response

“2.3 In its role LRSSB has the ability, and is frequently requested to, represent the UK light rail sector on various European Standards technical working groups and committees. The committees can be made up of representation from across Europe and include, owners, statutory bodies, designers, manufactures and operators. If a proposal has been voted for and accepted by BSi, it will then look to adopt the standard for the UK sector. RSSB act as the secretariat for BSi.”

Source location

2021-0337-Response-from-Light-Rail-Safety-and-Standards-Board-Doors_Published
Page 2 · response
Published 14 October 2021

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Continue developing the reference library of light rail safety standards and guidance.

Verbatim wording from the response

“1.5 LRSSB is recognised and accepted by the light rail community, the Department for Transport and the Office of Rail and Road in the UK as the industry body responsible for providing standards and guidance relating to safety and the design, construction, maintenance, and operation of light rail systems in the UK. LRSSB has established and is continuing to develop a reference library where such industry standards and guidance can be found.”

Source location

2021-0337-Response-from-Light-Rail-Safety-and-Standards-Board-Anonymous-reporting-CIRAS_Published
Page 2 · response
Published 14 October 2021

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Disseminate CIRAS committee information, reports and analytics to the light rail sector through the Light Rail Heads of Safety Group.

Verbatim wording from the response

“2.4 LRSSB is a member of the CIRAS committee representing the light rail sector, that is Chaired by the independent Chair of the CIRAS Board. The committee is made up from representatives of member companies and unions in addition to independent experts. The committee assists the organisation in ensuring its ongoing effectiveness and helps it adapt to the needs of its members and staff. LRSSB communicates information, reports and analytics raised at the CIRAS Committee to the sector via the Light Rail Heads of Safety Group.”

Source location

2021-0337-Response-from-Light-Rail-Safety-and-Standards-Board-Anonymous-reporting-CIRAS_Published
Page 2 · response
Published 14 October 2021

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Use the London Trams Safety Risk Model to assess risk before and after safety systems and measures are fitted.

Verbatim wording from the response

“We now use the London Trams Safety Risk Model which is an estimation of risk pre and post fitment of the above systems and safety measures and was introduced in response to the RAIB recommendations. This safety model has shown that the risk of a tram overturning has been reduced by 76% and therefore, by extension, also reduced the risk of someone being ejected through a door in the event of an accident of this type. TfL remains committed to reducing the risk of a tram overturning to as low as reasonably practicable and will review the recently issued LRSSB guidance notes and determine whether there is any more work we can do on the existing fleet to comply with this advice.”

Source location

2021-0337-Response-from-Transport-for-London_Published
Page 4 · response
Published 14 October 2021

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Ensure future London Tram fleet procurements meet applicable LRSSB guidance and incorporate learning from the existing-fleet door-strengthening work into door-mechanism specifications.

Verbatim wording from the response

“With respect to any new fleet that enters service on the London Tram network, we will ensure that during the specification phase for any procurement the manufacturers will comply with all appropriate LRSSB guidance in force at that time, but also ensure that any design of the door mechanism takes into account the learnings from the work we are undertaking with Alstom.”

Source location

2021-0337-Response-from-Transport-for-London_Published
Page 3 · response
Published 14 October 2021

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Determine the appropriate way forward for existing-fleet door improvements, including funding requirements and implementation timelines, after receiving the technical report.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Following the completion of this work, Alstom have committed to providing TfL with a full technical report confirming any improvement actions and final recommendations by the end of January 2022. Once this report is received, TfL will determine the appropriate way forward based on the report, including any funding requirements and timelines. TfL proposes to share this report with the Light Rail Safety Standards Board (LRSSB) as well as any other Tram systems that use the same type of vehicles as TfL’s CR4000 fleet. I will also provide an update to you which can be shared with all the Interested Persons involved in the Inquests.”

Source location

2021-0337-Response-from-Transport-for-London_Published
Page 3 · response
Published 14 October 2021

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Complete an engineering study assessing whether the CR4000 fleet’s existing door mechanisms can be strengthened and how any identified solution could be rolled out.

Verbatim wording from the response

“However, we remain committed to investigating whether anything can be done to strengthen the door mechanisms on our existing fleets as well as making sure this is addressed in the specification of any new fleet we procure.”

Source location

2021-0337-Response-from-Transport-for-London_Published
Page 3 · response
Published 14 October 2021

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Operate the procured, developed and installed Physical Prevention of Overspeed System at identified high-risk locations to automatically brake overspeeding trams to a controlled stop.

Verbatim wording from the response

“As you know, TfL has worked hard to consider and respond to all of the RAIB’s recommendations. A bespoke Physical Prevention of Overspeed System (PPOS) has been procured, developed and installed on the London Tram network. This system, the first of its kind in the United Kingdom, provides a high level of safety assurance by automatically braking the tram to a stand in a controlled manner, when an over-speed event is detected at 13 pre-identified locations, where the risk of overturning has been assessed as high.”

Source location

2021-0337-Response-from-Transport-for-London_Published
Page 4 · response
Published 14 October 2021

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Review recently issued LRSSB guidance and determine whether further work is needed on the existing fleet to comply with it.

Verbatim wording from the response

“We now use the London Trams Safety Risk Model which is an estimation of risk pre and post fitment of the above systems and safety measures and was introduced in response to the RAIB recommendations. This safety model has shown that the risk of a tram overturning has been reduced by 76% and therefore, by extension, also reduced the risk of someone being ejected through a door in the event of an accident of this type. TfL remains committed to reducing the risk of a tram overturning to as low as reasonably practicable and will review the recently issued LRSSB guidance notes and determine whether there is any more work we can do on the existing fleet to comply with this advice.”

Source location

2021-0337-Response-from-Transport-for-London_Published
Page 4 · response
Published 14 October 2021

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Review the published guidance after 12 months and monitor its implementation and supplementary network safety measures.

Verbatim wording from the response

“3.2 LRSSB believe that the adoption of the guidance published will significantly reduce the risk of a similar occurrence. LRSSB has placed a 12-month review date to the guidance and intends to monitor implementation along with any supplementary beneficial actions that the networks may have taken.”

Source location

2021-0337-Response-from-Light-Rail-Safety-and-Standards-Board-Auto-Braking_Published
Page 3 · response
Published 14 October 2021

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Continue monitoring advancements in automatic braking, driver inattention detection and speed management.

Verbatim wording from the response

“2.6 LRSSB will continue to monitor advancements in this area and have also recently commissioned a research and development trial for obstacle detection / avoidance systems for use on light rail vehicles. We expect the outcomes of this trial to be available by end January 2022.”

Source location

2021-0337-Response-from-Light-Rail-Safety-and-Standards-Board-Auto-Braking_Published
Page 3 · response
Published 14 October 2021

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Continue developing the light rail safety and standards reference library.

Verbatim wording from the response

“1.5 LRSSB is recognised and accepted by the light rail community, the Department for Transport and the Office of Rail and Road in the UK as the industry body responsible for providing standards and guidance relating to safety and the design, construction, maintenance, and operation of light rail systems in the UK. LRSSB has established and is continuing to develop a reference library where such industry standards and guidance can be found.”

Source location

2021-0337-Response-from-Light-Rail-Safety-and-Standards-Board-Auto-Braking_Published
Page 2 · response
Published 14 October 2021

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Use risk-model outputs to identify required technologies or processes and seek to mitigate identified events through standards, guidance or research and development.

Verbatim wording from the response

“3.3 LRSSB continues to record, monitor, and assess hazardous events and their precursors through the national Tram Accident and Incident Reporting database (TAIR). All networks submit data to this LRSSB database. These inputs are then fed through to the LRSSB National Risk Model which provides outputs that identify potential current and future risk to both the UK sector as a whole or an individual network. Using this data LRSSB can then focus attention on any new technology or process required. LRSSB will, by the production of standard / guidance or by research and development seek to mitigate the chance of the identified event occurring. LRSSB believe that the use of this “live” database and its outputs will aid the sector in preventing future serious incidents.”

Source location

2021-0337-Response-from-Light-Rail-Safety-and-Standards-Board-Auto-Braking_Published
Page 3 · response
Published 14 October 2021

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Publish guidance on detecting driver inattention and managing tram speed.

Verbatim wording from the response

“2.3 In May 2021 LRSSB published guidance on detection of driver inattention (Guidance Document LRG 17.0) and speed management (Guidance Document LRG 18.0) in response to RAIB recommendations 3 and 4 in the Sandilands Report. This guidance is now being implemented and/or trialled across the UK networks, including advanced options to provide continuous automatic vehicle speed monitoring, which is an intelligent safe-speed system for advance warning or hazard speed monitoring.”

Source location

2021-0337-Response-from-Light-Rail-Safety-and-Standards-Board-Auto-Braking_Published
Page 2 · response
Published 14 October 2021

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Commission and undertake research and development trials of obstacle detection and avoidance systems for light rail vehicles.

Verbatim wording from the response

“2.6 LRSSB will continue to monitor advancements in this area and have also recently commissioned a research and development trial for obstacle detection / avoidance systems for use on light rail vehicles. We expect the outcomes of this trial to be available by end January 2022.”

Source location

2021-0337-Response-from-Light-Rail-Safety-and-Standards-Board-Auto-Braking_Published
Page 3 · response
Published 14 October 2021

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Continue monitoring LRSSB’s progress on tram-door standards and work with LRSSB and the sector as standards decisions develop.

Verbatim wording from the response

“LRSSB is conducting ongoing engagement with various European Standards technical working groups and committees with a view to informing the regulation of security and crashworthiness of tram doors. We will continue to monitor the progress that LRSSB makes, and work with them, and the sector, should adoption of new standards be required. We expect LRSSB to advise on whether a change to the standards is required in 2022.”

Source location

2021-0337-Response-from-Department-for-Transport_Published
Page 2 · response
Published 14 October 2021

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Consult passenger groups, system operators and stakeholders on coordinating a nationwide process for passengers to raise tram safety concerns.

Verbatim wording from the response

“The Department is consulting with passenger groups, system operators and key stakeholders to assess how passengers can easily raise concerns of their safety with tram operators and how this may be co-ordinated nationwide. We are in discussion with Transport Focus and LRSSB on this and will agree a solution with all stakeholders in 2022.”

Source location

2021-0337-Response-from-Department-for-Transport_Published
Page 2 · response
Published 14 October 2021

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Agree a nationwide solution with Transport Focus, LRSSB and other stakeholders for raising passenger safety concerns in 2022.

Verbatim wording from the response

“The Department is consulting with passenger groups, system operators and key stakeholders to assess how passengers can easily raise concerns of their safety with tram operators and how this may be co-ordinated nationwide. We are in discussion with Transport Focus and LRSSB on this and will agree a solution with all stakeholders in 2022.”

Source location

2021-0337-Response-from-Department-for-Transport_Published
Page 2 · response
Published 14 October 2021

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Continue working with UK Tram, LRSSB, system operators and stakeholders to address concerns raised in the Prevention of Future Deaths reports.

Verbatim wording from the response

“The Department will continue to work closely with UK Tram, LRSSB, system operators and all key stakeholders on addressing the concerns that have been raised in the PFDs.”

Source location

2021-0337-Response-from-Department-for-Transport_Published
Page 2 · response
Published 14 October 2021

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Conduct a collaborative engineering assessment of in-service CR4000 doors, including detailed physical assessment and failure analyses, to identify strengthening options.

Verbatim wording from the response

“To meet the objective, ALSTOM has engaged with TfL to agree a collaborative approach to reviewing the feasibility of strengthening the in-service tram doors in particular at the lower part. This has involved information sharing and, importantly, TfL has provided ALSTOM with access to a CR4000 tram. This will enable detailed mechanical assessment of the tram doors and the evaluation of different options for strengthening the doors to lower the risk of passenger ejection.”

Source location

2021-0337-Response-from-Bombardier-Transportation-UK-Ltd_Published
Page 2 · response
Published 14 October 2021

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Consult approved door suppliers and relevant stakeholders on the feasibility of improved future door designs.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Once the evaluation of the current door design has been completed, ALSTOM will also engage other door manufacturers on its panel of specialist door manufacturers namely, Wabtec, Bode and Kangni, to obtain their views on the proposed changes to door standards. It is planned that this dialogue will begin in March 2022, after the initial investigation has been completed.”

Source location

2021-0337-Response-from-Bombardier-Transportation-UK-Ltd_Published
Page 2 · response
Published 14 October 2021

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Establish and communicate recommendations for applicable improvements to existing CR4000 fleets.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Once the studies described above are complete it is envisaged that by February 2022, ALSTOM should be in a position to make more detailed recommendations to TfL and other vehicle owners and operators as appropriate as to whether there are any improvements which can be made to the existing CR4000 fleet that would reduce the risk of passenger ejection through the lower part of the tram door leaf.”

Source location

2021-0337-Response-from-Bombardier-Transportation-UK-Ltd_Published
Page 2 · response
Published 14 October 2021

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Engage relevant authorities and standards bodies to review UK light-rail door regulation and, if necessary, recommend revisions.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Using the output from their investigations, ALSTOM will then be able to develop detailed recommendations regarding any changes which are appropriate to future door designs and share those recommendations with other relevant stakeholders and regulators including RSSB (Light Rail) the DfT, Office of Road and Rail, TfL and other local transport authorities who are responsible for establishing or specifying relevant safety standards. In accordance with normal industry practices, those recommendations may then be adopted as industry standards and mandated for future trams designed by both ALSTOM and others. It is envisaged that the recommendations will be available by April 2022.”

Source location

2021-0337-Response-from-Bombardier-Transportation-UK-Ltd_Published
Page 2 · response
Published 14 October 2021

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Assemble an international multidisciplinary team to investigate feasible changes to current and future tram-door designs.

Verbatim wording from the response

“An international team including experts from ALSTOM and IFE has been assembled to investigate any changes to current and future tram door design which might be feasible. This is a considerable exercise given the complexity of the tram system.”

Source location

2021-0337-Response-from-Bombardier-Transportation-UK-Ltd_Published
Page 1 · response
Published 14 October 2021

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Share recommendations for current in-service CR4000 doors with vehicle owners.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Once the studies described above are complete it is envisaged that by February 2022, ALSTOM should be in a position to make more detailed recommendations to TfL and other vehicle owners and operators as appropriate as to whether there are any improvements which can be made to the existing CR4000 fleet that would reduce the risk of passenger ejection through the lower part of the tram door leaf.”

Source location

2021-0337-Response-from-Bombardier-Transportation-UK-Ltd_Published
Page 2 · response
Published 14 October 2021

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Present the findings of the door-strengthening and feasibility studies to the Senior Coroner, including the industry perspective and regulatory recommendations.

Verbatim wording from the response

“If it would be of assistance to HM Senior Coroner, ALSTOM would be happy to provide further progress reports to HM Senior Coroner and/or a fuller report setting out the steps taken to review the strengthening of current and future door design and its conclusions regarding the feasibility of door strengthening. It is anticipated that the entire process, as outlined above, will be completed by June 2022. For HM Senior Coroner’s ease of reference and to provide further details of ALSTOM’s timetable for investigating the feasibility of changes to current and future door design, I attach a copy of the timetable prepared by ALSTOM.”

Source location

2021-0337-Response-from-Bombardier-Transportation-UK-Ltd_Published
Page 3 · response
Published 14 October 2021

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Continue discussions with IFE on strengthening current doors and developing future door-design standards.

Verbatim wording from the response

“In tandem with ALSTOM’s review of the door design, ALSTOM is continuing discussions regarding changes to the design of in-service doors and future door design standards with IFE, the manufacturer of the doors in the CR4000 trams. Such discussions will continue notwithstanding previous assurances given to BTUK by IFE that the IFE door leaves comply with EN14752 (issued after the design and supply of the CR4000 trams) and that door designs have evolved with a tendency to higher strength. It is anticipated that these initial discussions will be completed by the end of 2021.”

Source location

2021-0337-Response-from-Bombardier-Transportation-UK-Ltd_Published
Page 2 · response
Published 14 October 2021

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Review future tram-door designs and establish recommendations for applicable improvements to new-build and future fleets.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Using the output from their investigations, ALSTOM will then be able to develop detailed recommendations regarding any changes which are appropriate to future door designs and share those recommendations with other relevant stakeholders and regulators including RSSB (Light Rail) the DfT, Office of Road and Rail, TfL and other local transport authorities who are responsible for establishing or specifying relevant safety standards. In accordance with normal industry practices, those recommendations may then be adopted as industry standards and mandated for future trams designed by both ALSTOM and others. It is envisaged that the recommendations will be available by April 2022.”

Source location

2021-0337-Response-from-Bombardier-Transportation-UK-Ltd_Published
Page 2 · response
Published 14 October 2021

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Transport Focus lacks the remit and resources to initiate a bespoke tram passenger safety group.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Transport Focus has neither the remit nor the resources to initiate the creation of a bespoke “tram passenger safety group” itself, but – together with our colleagues at London TravelWatch – we will engage with the tram service operators (and/or LRSSB, as appropriate) in relation to any passenger safety issues brought to our notice by users. And if the formation of a group of the kind you envisage is initiated under the auspices of any other body, we will certainly seek to facilitate and support it to the best of our ability.”

Source location

2021-0337-Response-from-Transport-Focus_Published
Page 3 · response
Published 14 October 2021

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

London TravelWatch is not a dedicated passenger safety group and therefore cannot serve as a model for the proposed national group.

Verbatim wording from the response

“I should explain at the outset that there appears to be a misapprehension here regarding the precise nature and role of our sister organisation London TravelWatch. Its function is to reflect the interests and concerns of the travelling public in general within its geographical sphere of interest, and therefore safety (though important) is only one of the myriad of issues on which it engages with the service providers. It is true that - together with Transport Focus - it has consultative status with the Office of Rail and Road (ORR), the DfT and the Rail Accident Investigation Branch (RAIB) on safety issues, that it is represented on ORR's Rail Industry Health and Safety Advisory Committee, and that it has participated in inquiries and inquests into serious railway and tramway accidents.”

Source location

2021-0337-Response-from-Transport-Focus_Published
Page 1 · response
Published 14 October 2021

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

The amount of responsive work LRSSB can undertake depends directly on its Department for Transport funding settlement, which is not guaranteed beyond August 2022.

Verbatim wording from the response

“1.4 While LRSSB received an initial 3-year funding settlement from the Department for Transport it has no guarantee of future funding at the end of this initial funding period”

Source location

2021-0337-Response-from-Light-Rail-Safety-and-Standards-Board-Doors_Published
Page 1 · response
Published 14 October 2021

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Existing driver-inattention and speed-management guidance and implementation should significantly reduce the risk of a similar occurrence.

Verbatim wording from the response

“2.3 In May 2021 LRSSB published guidance on detection of driver inattention (Guidance Document LRG 17.0) and speed management (Guidance Document LRG 18.0) in response to RAIB recommendations 3 and 4 in the Sandilands Report. This guidance is now being implemented and/or trialled across the UK networks, including advanced options to provide continuous automatic vehicle speed monitoring, which is an intelligent safe-speed system for advance warning or hazard speed monitoring.”

Source location

2021-0337-Response-from-Light-Rail-Safety-and-Standards-Board-Auto-Braking_Published
Page 2 · response
Published 14 October 2021

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Individual tram networks are responsible for developing and finalising system-specific driver-inattention and speed-monitoring risk controls.

Verbatim wording from the response

“2. LRSSB's current ongoing work with respect to Automatic Braking [Driver Inattention and Speed Management Systems]”

Source location

2021-0337-Response-from-Light-Rail-Safety-and-Standards-Board-Auto-Braking_Published
Page 2 · response
Published 14 October 2021

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

The centrally funded national passenger safety group and automatic braking issues were not addressed to tram operators, so no commentary is provided.

Verbatim wording from the response

“The PFD reports concerning the lack of a centrally funded national tram safety passenger group and automatic braking were not addressed to tramway operators. Therefore, I do not provide commentary on those issues in this letter.”

Source location

2021-0337-Response-from-Tram-Operations-Ltd_Published
Page 1 · response
Published 14 October 2021

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

The operator does not own the trams or have authority to implement tram-door adaptations.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Please note that whilst TOL is the operator of the trams, it does not own the trams or have the power to implement changes to them. The trams are owned and managed by Tramtrack Croydon Ltd (“TCL”), trading as London Trams (a wholly owned subsidiary of Transport for London). The ultimate decision on any adaptation of tram doors on Croydon Tramlink sits with London Trams in conjunction with tram manufacturers. Therefore, I can provide only limited commentary on this point from TOL’s perspective.”

Source location

2021-0337-Response-from-Tram-Operations-Ltd_Published
Page 2 · response
Published 14 October 2021

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

London Trams, together with tram manufacturers, holds the ultimate decision on adapting Croydon Tramlink tram doors.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Please note that whilst TOL is the operator of the trams, it does not own the trams or have the power to implement changes to them. The trams are owned and managed by Tramtrack Croydon Ltd (“TCL”), trading as London Trams (a wholly owned subsidiary of Transport for London). The ultimate decision on any adaptation of tram doors on Croydon Tramlink sits with London Trams in conjunction with tram manufacturers. Therefore, I can provide only limited commentary on this point from TOL’s perspective.”

Source location

2021-0337-Response-from-Tram-Operations-Ltd_Published
Page 2 · response
Published 14 October 2021

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Relevant authorities and regulators are responsible for establishing or specifying safety standards; recommendations may be adopted or mandated by them.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Using the output from their investigations, ALSTOM will then be able to develop detailed recommendations regarding any changes which are appropriate to future door designs and share those recommendations with other relevant stakeholders and regulators including RSSB (Light Rail) the DfT, Office of Road and Rail, TfL and other local transport authorities who are responsible for establishing or specifying relevant safety standards. In accordance with normal industry practices, those recommendations may then be adopted as industry standards and mandated for future trams designed by both ALSTOM and others. It is envisaged that the recommendations will be available by April 2022.”

Source location

2021-0337-Response-from-Bombardier-Transportation-UK-Ltd_Published
Page 2 · response
Published 14 October 2021

Open published response
Back to top

Information checked against the published report and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Official responses located
6/6

Data last updated 7 September 2026