PFD report

Calogero Di Blasi · Prevention of Future Deaths report

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

Issued 15 Nov 2023•Avon

Report record

Published report and response evidence

This page connects the concerns raised in this report with statements found in recipients’ published responses. A link shows a clear evidence connection; it does not assign responsibility.

View original report
Concerns
3

Raised in this report

Recipients
3

Named on the report

Responses found
2

Of 3 recipients

Stated actions
18

Described in responses

Source document

Full report text

This is the full text from the original published report.

Open published report

Concerns and recipient responses

Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

Report evidence summary

Concerns raised3

  1. Failure of specialty teams to communicate investigation information and share results in a timely manner
    Part of recurring concern: Failure to ensure clinical investigation results are reliably available, interpreted and acted uponPart of recurring concern: Unreliable communication of patient-care information between clinical staff
  2. Failure of 2-week urgent cancer pathway timeframes to include investigation reporting and referring-clinician review
    Part of recurring concern: Failure to ensure clinical investigation results are reliably available, interpreted and acted uponPart of recurring concern: Unreliable two-week-wait cancer referral pathways
  3. Insufficient breadth of endoscopist training for recognition of less frequently occurring lesions
Responses linked to these concerns

Each statement is shown once, even when linked to more than one concern.

Actions described in response An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.13

  1. Action

    Reformed cancer waiting-time standards by introducing the 28-day Faster Diagnosis Standard and consolidating nine reporting standards into three.

    Stated by Department of Health and Social CareStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 21 November 2023.
  2. Action

    Provide locum radiology cover and additional reporting sessions for existing radiologists.

    Stated by Bristol NHS Foundation TrustStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 21 November 2023.
  3. Action

    Launch a joint digital strategy to converge provider-collaborative IT systems and centralise clinical information digitally.

    Stated by Bristol NHS Foundation TrustStated in progressThe respondent said that this action was in progress when they made their response on 21 November 2023.

Respondent positions A position is what a recipient says about a concern when it does not describe a specific action.5

  1. Position

    Local management and implementation of national policies and procedures is assigned to NHS England and the responsible Integrated Care Board.

    Stated by Department of Health and Social CareRedirects responsibilityThe respondent said that another organisation was responsible for deciding or taking action.

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure of specialty teams to communicate investigation information and share results in a timely manner

Wider context from the report

“(1) That one of the teams caring for Mr Di Blasi was completely unaware of the input from another specialty team, despite both referrals being made under the 2-week urgent referral pathway. The lack of communication between these teams meant that timely sharing of results did not occur. Even the very knowledge of the fact that a CT scan had taken place would have alerted the endoscopist to check those results, and it is likely that the second endoscopy would not have gone ahead. I understand this to be a national issue and is likely to apply to other investigations being carried out. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Failure to ensure clinical investigation results are reliably available, interpreted and acted upon; Unreliable communication of patient-care information between clinical staff.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure of 2-week urgent cancer pathway timeframes to include investigation reporting and referring-clinician review

Wider context from the report

“(2) That the reporting timeframes on the 2-week urgent cancer pathway referral does not take into account timeframes for reporting investigative procedures or subsequent review by the referring clinicians. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Failure to ensure clinical investigation results are reliably available, interpreted and acted upon; Unreliable two-week-wait cancer referral pathways.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Insufficient breadth of endoscopist training for recognition of less frequently occurring lesions

Wider context from the report

“(3) The current training for Endoscopists for JAG certification requires the performance of 200 endoscopies. However, these tend to focus on the clinician’s area of specialty and therefore there is a danger that lesion recognition will be limited and insufficient to ensure that endoscopists are able to recognise less frequently occurring lesions. With the need for an increasing number of endoscopists, action should be taken. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

No recurring-concern membership is currently published.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Reformed cancer waiting-time standards by introducing the 28-day Faster Diagnosis Standard and consolidating nine reporting standards into three.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Since the death of Mr Di Blasi, NHS England and the Department have reformed cancer waiting time standards, following a clinically led review. This has replaced the two-week wait standard with the Faster Diagnosis Standard (FDS) for patients to get a cancer diagnosis or all-clear within 28 days of an urgent referral. The FDS moves focus away from process to deliver a clear clinical outcome – either diagnosing or ruling out cancer. This represents an improvement on the preceding 2-week wait standard, which was simply to “see a specialist” and addresses the coroners concerns, as the new standard takes into account times for reporting and reviewing diagnostic procedures. The reform also consolidated cancer standards from nine to three to reduce bureaucracy of reporting against a large number of standards.”

Source location

Response from Department of Health and Social Care
Page 1 · response
Published 21 November 2023

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Provide locum radiology cover and additional reporting sessions for existing radiologists.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Regrettably, in parallel with a number of organisations across the country, the Trust is not meeting this timeframe. The following mitigations have been put in place:”

Source location

Response from University Hospitals Bristol and Weston NHS Foundation Trust
Page 2 · response
Published 21 November 2023

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Launch a joint digital strategy to converge provider-collaborative IT systems and centralise clinical information digitally.

Verbatim wording from the response

“UHBW and NBT will shortly appoint a joint Chief Executive and Chair. The Chief Digital Information Officer has already been appointed across both Trusts and is in the process of launching a Digital Strategy, with the aim of converging the IT systems across the provider collaborative.”

Source location

Response from University Hospitals Bristol and Weston NHS Foundation Trust
Page 4 · response
Published 21 November 2023

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Add radiology turnaround times to the divisional risk register.

Verbatim wording from the response

“All of the above actions will increase reporting capacity and seek to enact the recommendations from the national guidance. In addition, the Radiology team have added a risk to the risk register around turnaround times. This will ensure that this remains a priority for the Division.”

Source location

Response from University Hospitals Bristol and Weston NHS Foundation Trust
Page 2 · response
Published 21 November 2023

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Collaborate with SWETA to create a mandatory local gastrointestinal endoscopy learning resource for statutory training.

Verbatim wording from the response

“• Endoscopists have access to an online endoscopy learning platform (GIEQs online; accredited by the European Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) and American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ASGE)). We are able to audit uptake of the online content prior to quarterly EUG meetings. We are also collaborating with the South-West Endoscopy Training Academy (SWETA) to create a mandatory local learning resource that will form a part of the Trust statutory training for staff involved in gastrointestinal endoscopy.”

Source location

Response from University Hospitals Bristol and Weston NHS Foundation Trust
Page 4 · response
Published 21 November 2023

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Recruit radiologists to fill vacancies and increase reporting capacity.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Regrettably, in parallel with a number of organisations across the country, the Trust is not meeting this timeframe. The following mitigations have been put in place:”

Source location

Response from University Hospitals Bristol and Weston NHS Foundation Trust
Page 2 · response
Published 21 November 2023

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Use outsourced radiology reporting to maximise reports completed within the target timeframe.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Regrettably, in parallel with a number of organisations across the country, the Trust is not meeting this timeframe. The following mitigations have been put in place:”

Source location

Response from University Hospitals Bristol and Weston NHS Foundation Trust
Page 2 · response
Published 21 November 2023

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Provide recurring endoscopy training lists, fellow placements and cross-institutional JAG-certified courses covering broader lesion recognition and pathology.

Verbatim wording from the response

“The Trust has taken further action, over and above those completed for the PSII, to address this concern:”

Source location

Response from University Hospitals Bristol and Weston NHS Foundation Trust
Page 3 · response
Published 21 November 2023

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Scope increased radiographer resource to support radiologists.

Verbatim wording from the response

“• The Division is undertaking a scoping exercise to increase the resource of radiographers who could support the radiologists.”

Source location

Response from University Hospitals Bristol and Weston NHS Foundation Trust
Page 2 · response
Published 21 November 2023

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Scope administrative review of patient lists to identify parallel clinical pathways before endoscopy and assess a possible pilot.

Verbatim wording from the response

“I asked ████████ and the witnesses to consider whether any further action could be taken to strengthen the pre-procedure checklist. I am advised that they have identified an additional potential change in practice. The Division of Surgery will undertake a scoping exercise to assess the feasibility of the administrative teams reviewing the patient list and identifying any patients who are on a parallel clinical pathway. The endoscopist would then be notified to review the electronic records and ICE and any relevant investigations before the procedure. Upon completion of the scoping exercise, the Division will consider whether a pilot may be offered for the endoscopy team.”

Source location

Response from University Hospitals Bristol and Weston NHS Foundation Trust
Page 2 · response
Published 21 November 2023

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Provide accredited online endoscopy learning and audit uptake before quarterly endoscopy users’ meetings.

Verbatim wording from the response

“• Endoscopists have access to an online endoscopy learning platform (GIEQs online; accredited by the European Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) and American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ASGE)). We are able to audit uptake of the online content prior to quarterly EUG meetings. We are also collaborating with the South-West Endoscopy Training Academy (SWETA) to create a mandatory local learning resource that will form a part of the Trust statutory training for staff involved in gastrointestinal endoscopy.”

Source location

Response from University Hospitals Bristol and Weston NHS Foundation Trust
Page 4 · response
Published 21 November 2023

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Discontinue paper radiology reports from 1 May 2024.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Aligned to this, I have received an update in respect of the paper reports for radiology; these will be discontinued from 1 May 2024. Results will continue to be available via the ICE and PACS electronic reporting systems. As part of the transition away from paper results, the Trust plans to set up specialty specific reporting systems within our existing digital platforms.”

Source location

Response from University Hospitals Bristol and Weston NHS Foundation Trust
Page 3 · response
Published 21 November 2023

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Set up specialty-specific radiology reporting systems within existing digital platforms.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Aligned to this, I have received an update in respect of the paper reports for radiology; these will be discontinued from 1 May 2024. Results will continue to be available via the ICE and PACS electronic reporting systems. As part of the transition away from paper results, the Trust plans to set up specialty specific reporting systems within our existing digital platforms.”

Source location

Response from University Hospitals Bristol and Weston NHS Foundation Trust
Page 3 · response
Published 21 November 2023

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Local management and implementation of national policies and procedures is assigned to NHS England and the responsible Integrated Care Board.

Verbatim wording from the response

“In preparing this response, Departmental officials have made enquiries with NHS England. The matters of concern you raise relate to the local management and implementation of national policies and procedures. As such, I requested NHS England liaise with the North Somerset and South Gloucestershire Integrated Care Board (ICB) responsible for University Hospitals Bristol and Weston NHS Foundation Trust.”

Source location

Response from Department of Health and Social Care
Page 1 · response
Published 21 November 2023

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

The Faster Diagnosis Standard is considered to address concerns by including diagnostic reporting and review times within the cancer waiting-time standard.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Since the death of Mr Di Blasi, NHS England and the Department have reformed cancer waiting time standards, following a clinically led review. This has replaced the two-week wait standard with the Faster Diagnosis Standard (FDS) for patients to get a cancer diagnosis or all-clear within 28 days of an urgent referral. The FDS moves focus away from process to deliver a clear clinical outcome – either diagnosing or ruling out cancer. This represents an improvement on the preceding 2-week wait standard, which was simply to “see a specialist” and addresses the coroners concerns, as the new standard takes into account times for reporting and reviewing diagnostic procedures. The reform also consolidated cancer standards from nine to three to reduce bureaucracy of reporting against a large number of standards.”

Source location

Response from Department of Health and Social Care
Page 1 · response
Published 21 November 2023

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Existing clinician checks provide a robust process for identifying relevant investigations for patients on parallel clinical pathways.

Verbatim wording from the response

“As many patients are treated out of the region or in private or satellite institutions, the subsequent check by the clinician, through a discussion with the patient, provides another opportunity to identify relevant investigations, thereby ensuring there is a robust process in place.”

Source location

Response from University Hospitals Bristol and Weston NHS Foundation Trust
Page 2 · response
Published 21 November 2023

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Radiology reporting cannot consistently meet the three-day cancer-pathway timeframe because of national staffing shortages, despite mitigation measures.

Verbatim wording from the response

“As you heard in evidence, there is, regrettably, a national shortage of Radiologists. I therefore envisage that the Secretary of State for Health may wish to add to the below response from the Trust.”

Source location

Response from University Hospitals Bristol and Weston NHS Foundation Trust
Page 2 · response
Published 21 November 2023

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

The Royal College of Physicians and its Joint Advisory Group on GI Endoscopy are responsible for responding nationally to endoscopist training concerns.

Verbatim wording from the response

“3) The current training for Endoscopists for JAG accreditation requires the performance of 200 endoscopies. However, these tend to focus on clinician’s area of specialty and therefore there is danger that lesion recognition will be limited and insufficient to ensure that endoscopies are able to recognise less frequently occurring lesions. With the need for an increasing number of endoscopists, action should be taken.”

Source location

Response from University Hospitals Bristol and Weston NHS Foundation Trust
Page 3 · response
Published 21 November 2023

Open published response

Other statements in published responses

These actions and other statements could not be clearly connected to one concern in this report.

Recipient-stated actions An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.5

  1. 1

    Share the PSII learning with the Patient Safety Group to cascade it across clinical specialties.

    Stated by Bristol NHS Foundation TrustStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 21 November 2023.
  2. 2

    Review the incidental findings standard operating procedure against recent national recommendations.

    Stated by Bristol NHS Foundation TrustStated plannedThe respondent said that this action was planned when they made their response on 21 November 2023.
  3. 3

    Require patients to disclose recent investigations on the endoscopy pre-procedure checklist.

    Stated by Bristol NHS Foundation TrustStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 21 November 2023.
  4. 4

    Audit endoscopy photo documentation through the recurring audit plan.

    Stated by Bristol NHS Foundation TrustStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 21 November 2023.
  5. 5

    Share learning from the case through pan-Trust and specialty endoscopy education meetings.

    Stated by Bristol NHS Foundation TrustStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 21 November 2023.

Recipient positions A position is what a recipient says about a concern when they do not describe a specific action.1

  1. 1

    Adding electronic alerts for chronic varices or new diagnoses is considered impracticable, infeasible and potentially detrimental to patient safety.

    Stated by Bristol NHS Foundation TrustUnable to actThe respondent said that a constraint prevented them from taking the relevant action.

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Share the PSII learning with the Patient Safety Group to cascade it across clinical specialties.

Verbatim wording from the response

“• The PSII has also been shared at the Patient Safety Group, which has representation from all of the Clinical Divisions at the Trust, to ensure learning is cascaded across all specialties.”

Source location

Response from University Hospitals Bristol and Weston NHS Foundation Trust
Page 4 · response
Published 21 November 2023

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Review the incidental findings standard operating procedure against recent national recommendations.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Secondly, the guidance confirms that local Standard Operating Procedures (SOPs) should identify ‘urgent’, ‘emergency’ and ‘time critical’ findings. You heard in evidence that the Trust’s SOP on Incidental Findings will be reviewed, with a view to updating this to reflect the recent national recommendations of the royal colleges.”

Source location

Response from University Hospitals Bristol and Weston NHS Foundation Trust
Page 2 · response
Published 21 November 2023

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Require patients to disclose recent investigations on the endoscopy pre-procedure checklist.

Verbatim wording from the response

“I understand that you heard evidence from the clinical team around the additional question on the pre-procedure checklist for endoscopy. A patient is now asked whether they have had any investigations within the last 6 weeks, and I was pleased to hear that this has been effective in identifying such investigations.”

Source location

Response from University Hospitals Bristol and Weston NHS Foundation Trust
Page 1 · response
Published 21 November 2023

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Audit endoscopy photo documentation through the recurring audit plan.

Verbatim wording from the response

“I understand that Mr Di Blasi’s family requested that the learning from this inquest be shared with the Clinical Endoscopist who performed the first endoscopy, but who no longer works at the Trust. The Trust will endeavour to achieve this. Lastly, it may be helpful to confirm that the Endoscopy team is auditing photo documentation during an endoscopy as part of the recurring audit plan.”

Source location

Response from University Hospitals Bristol and Weston NHS Foundation Trust
Page 4 · response
Published 21 November 2023

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Share learning from the case through pan-Trust and specialty endoscopy education meetings.

Verbatim wording from the response

“• Learning from this case has been shared at our pan-UHBW Endoscopy Users Group (EUG), in addition to local Gastroenterology and Hepatology education meetings.”

Source location

Response from University Hospitals Bristol and Weston NHS Foundation Trust
Page 3 · response
Published 21 November 2023

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Adding electronic alerts for chronic varices or new diagnoses is considered impracticable, infeasible and potentially detrimental to patient safety.

Verbatim wording from the response

“I thought it important to update on the action the Trust has considered but would be unable to implement.”

Source location

Response from University Hospitals Bristol and Weston NHS Foundation Trust
Page 3 · response
Published 21 November 2023

Open published response
Back to top

Information checked against the published report and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Official responses located
2/3

Data last updated 7 September 2026