PFD report

David Honnor · Prevention of Future Deaths report

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

Issued 30 Aug 2022•Dorset

Report record

Published report and response evidence

This page connects the concerns raised in this report with statements found in recipients’ published responses. A link shows a clear evidence connection; it does not assign responsibility.

View original report
Concerns
3

Raised in this report

Recipients
2

Named on the report

Responses found
1

Of 2 recipients

Stated actions
0

Described in responses

Source document

Full report text

This is the full text from the original published report.

Open published report

Concerns and recipient responses

Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

Report evidence summary

Concerns raised3

  1. Lack of colour coding of gas cylinders for emergency-service identification
  2. Lack of licensing controls for public purchase or acquisition of gas canisters
  3. Insufficient clarity and adequacy of gas canister safety information
Responses linked to these concerns

Each statement is shown once, even when linked to more than one concern.

Respondent positions A position is what a recipient says about a concern when it does not describe a specific action.3

  1. Position

    Existing labelling, safety data sheet and sector-specific requirements provide safety information for OFN and other hazardous chemical products.

    Stated by Health and Safety ExecutiveExisting arrangements considered sufficientThe respondent said that existing arrangements were sufficient, so no further action was needed.

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Lack of colour coding of gas cylinders for emergency-service identification

Wider context from the report

“2. I have concerns with regard to the following: i. I have concerns that members of the public are able to purchase or acquire ████████. ii. I have concerns that these products should be licensed. iii. I have concerns that there is no colour coding of gas cylinders to assist first response emergency services. iv. I have concerns as to whether the safety information on these gas cannisters is clear and sufficient. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

No recurring-concern membership is currently published.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Lack of licensing controls for public purchase or acquisition of gas canisters

Wider context from the report

“2. I have concerns with regard to the following: i. I have concerns that members of the public are able to purchase or acquire ████████. ii. I have concerns that these products should be licensed. iii. I have concerns that there is no colour coding of gas cylinders to assist first response emergency services. iv. I have concerns as to whether the safety information on these gas cannisters is clear and sufficient. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

No recurring-concern membership is currently published.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Insufficient clarity and adequacy of gas canister safety information

Wider context from the report

“2. I have concerns with regard to the following: i. I have concerns that members of the public are able to purchase or acquire ████████. ii. I have concerns that these products should be licensed. iii. I have concerns that there is no colour coding of gas cylinders to assist first response emergency services. iv. I have concerns as to whether the safety information on these gas cannisters is clear and sufficient. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

No recurring-concern membership is currently published.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Existing labelling, safety data sheet and sector-specific requirements provide safety information for OFN and other hazardous chemical products.

Verbatim wording from the response

“The label located on the shoulder of a gas cylinder is intended to be the primary method of hazard identification. The label should contain mandatory information required under legislation such as the retained Regulation (EC) No. 1272/2008 on the classification, labelling and packaging of substances and mixtures (the GB CLP Regulation’), for which HSE, as the GB CLP Agency, has responsibility.”

Source location

Response from Health and Safety Executive
Page 2 · response
Published 4 October 2022

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

OFN poses minimum risk and therefore is not restricted for consumer supply under the UK REACH Regulation.

Verbatim wording from the response

“As a chemically inert substance that is not intrinsically toxic to humans or the environment and cannot support combustion, OFN poses a minimum risk. As such, OFN is not restricted for supply or use under the UK REACH Regulation and is available for sale to consumers.”

Source location

Response from Health and Safety Executive
Page 2 · response
Published 4 October 2022

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

The BS EN 1089-3 colour-coding standard identifies nitrogen cylinders, including OFN, by their black shoulder colour.

Verbatim wording from the response

“A harmonised standard, BS EN 1089-3, exists across the gases industry in Europe (including the UK) and governs the colour coding of transportable gas cylinders. This colour coding system provides a method by which to easily identify the contents of a gas cylinder primarily via its properties, particularly in an emergency situation.”

Source location

Response from Health and Safety Executive
Page 2 · response
Published 4 October 2022

Open published response

Other statements in published responses

These actions and other statements could not be clearly connected to one concern in this report.

Recipient positions A position is what a recipient says about a concern when they do not describe a specific action.1

  1. 1

    Existing product safety legislation and local trading standards enforcement protect consumers from unsafe OFN products.

    Stated by Health and Safety ExecutiveExisting arrangements considered sufficientThe respondent said that existing arrangements were sufficient, so no further action was needed.

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Existing product safety legislation and local trading standards enforcement protect consumers from unsafe OFN products.

Verbatim wording from the response

“The UK has a robust legislative framework to protect UK consumers from unsafe products. The General Product Safety Regulations 2005 require all products to be safe in their normal or reasonably foreseeable usage and enforcement authorities have powers to take appropriate action when this obligation is not met. There is also sector-specific legislation where manufacturers and businesses have specific obligations to ensure they are supplying safe products. This includes the Simple Pressure Vessels (Safety) Regulations 2016 and the Pressure Equipment (Safety) Regulations 2016, as they apply to Great Britain.”

Source location

Response from Health and Safety Executive
Page 2 · response
Published 4 October 2022

Open published response
Back to top

Information checked against the published report and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Official responses located
1/2

Data last updated 7 September 2026