PFD report

Hamish John Cameron HOWITT · Prevention of Future Deaths report

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

Issued 23 Sep 2021•West Sussex

Report record

Published report and response evidence

This page connects the concerns raised in this report with statements found in recipients’ published responses. A link shows a clear evidence connection; it does not assign responsibility.

View original report
Concerns
4

Raised in this report

Recipients
4

Named on the report

Responses found
4

Of 4 recipients

Stated actions
10

Described in responses

Source document

Full report text

This is the full text from the original published report.

Open published report

Concerns and recipient responses

Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

Report evidence summary

Concerns raised4

  1. Absence of directives in police training material and national policy on referral of apparently intoxicated injured people
    Part of recurring concern: Insufficient police training for safe recognition and response to mental-health and behaviour-related medical crisesPart of recurring concern: Unsafe controls for intoxication requiring medical attention
  2. Alcohol-appearing effects masking serious underlying medical conditions
    Part of recurring concern: Unsafe controls for intoxication requiring medical attention
  3. Insufficient police training to identify and refer apparently intoxicated people complaining of injury
    Part of recurring concern: Insufficient police training for safe recognition and response to mental-health and behaviour-related medical crisesPart of recurring concern: Unsafe controls for intoxication requiring medical attention
Responses linked to these concerns

Each statement is shown once, even when linked to more than one concern.

Actions described in response An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.9

  1. Action

    Review FALP learning outcomes with clinical leads and assess adding stronger coverage of alcohol, intentional overdoses, and head injuries to Module 2.

    Stated by College of Policing and National Police Chiefs’ CouncilStated in progressThe respondent said that this action was in progress when they made their response on 5 October 2021.
  2. Action

    Add essential head-injury guidance to Modules 3 and 4 head-injury training.

    Stated by Avon and Somerset ConstabularyStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 5 October 2021.
  3. Action

    Incorporate head-injury response guidance into Taser, Personal Safety and Public Order training programmes.

    Stated by Avon and Somerset ConstabularyStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 5 October 2021.

Respondent positions A position is what a recipient says about a concern when it does not describe a specific action.4

  1. Position

    Existing first-aid training and formal governance routes will address the concerns about police responses to injured or vulnerable people.

    Stated by Home OfficeExisting arrangements considered sufficientThe respondent said that existing arrangements were sufficient, so no further action was needed.

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Absence of directives in police training material and national policy on referral of apparently intoxicated injured people

Wider context from the report

“(1) it is highly unlikely that Hamish would have died had he gone to hospital when the police saw him after the incident. Police at the scene did not recommend or encourage this course of action. (2) The apparent effects of alcohol when assessed by police (who are not medically qualified) can frequently mask serious underlying conditions such as traumatic brain injury (in this case) but also symptoms of post epileptic attack; diabetic high/low; and drug taking (either prescribed or illegally used). (3) Police Officers who come into contact with the public are not medically qualified but must be trained at both a national and local level to take steps to ensure those who appear inebriated and are complaining of injury are taken to hospital/seen by ambulance services. (4) Police training material and national policy setting should include directives to this effect. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Insufficient police training for safe recognition and response to mental-health and behaviour-related medical crises; Unsafe controls for intoxication requiring medical attention.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Alcohol-appearing effects masking serious underlying medical conditions

Wider context from the report

“(1) it is highly unlikely that Hamish would have died had he gone to hospital when the police saw him after the incident. Police at the scene did not recommend or encourage this course of action. (2) The apparent effects of alcohol when assessed by police (who are not medically qualified) can frequently mask serious underlying conditions such as traumatic brain injury (in this case) but also symptoms of post epileptic attack; diabetic high/low; and drug taking (either prescribed or illegally used). (3) Police Officers who come into contact with the public are not medically qualified but must be trained at both a national and local level to take steps to ensure those who appear inebriated and are complaining of injury are taken to hospital/seen by ambulance services. (4) Police training material and national policy setting should include directives to this effect. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Unsafe controls for intoxication requiring medical attention.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Insufficient police training to identify and refer apparently intoxicated people complaining of injury

Wider context from the report

“(1) it is highly unlikely that Hamish would have died had he gone to hospital when the police saw him after the incident. Police at the scene did not recommend or encourage this course of action. (2) The apparent effects of alcohol when assessed by police (who are not medically qualified) can frequently mask serious underlying conditions such as traumatic brain injury (in this case) but also symptoms of post epileptic attack; diabetic high/low; and drug taking (either prescribed or illegally used). (3) Police Officers who come into contact with the public are not medically qualified but must be trained at both a national and local level to take steps to ensure those who appear inebriated and are complaining of injury are taken to hospital/seen by ambulance services. (4) Police training material and national policy setting should include directives to this effect. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Insufficient police training for safe recognition and response to mental-health and behaviour-related medical crises; Unsafe controls for intoxication requiring medical attention.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to recommend hospital or ambulance assessment for apparently intoxicated people complaining of injury

Wider context from the report

“(1) it is highly unlikely that Hamish would have died had he gone to hospital when the police saw him after the incident. Police at the scene did not recommend or encourage this course of action. (2) The apparent effects of alcohol when assessed by police (who are not medically qualified) can frequently mask serious underlying conditions such as traumatic brain injury (in this case) but also symptoms of post epileptic attack; diabetic high/low; and drug taking (either prescribed or illegally used). (3) Police Officers who come into contact with the public are not medically qualified but must be trained at both a national and local level to take steps to ensure those who appear inebriated and are complaining of injury are taken to hospital/seen by ambulance services. (4) Police training material and national policy setting should include directives to this effect. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Unsafe controls for intoxication requiring medical attention.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Review FALP learning outcomes with clinical leads and assess adding stronger coverage of alcohol, intentional overdoses, and head injuries to Module 2.

Verbatim wording from the response

“As a matter of course, all coroner reports and requests related to the provision of first aid by police officers are reviewed by the NPCC First Aid Forum as a standing agenda item. The College is also working with clinical leads to review the high-level learning outcomes within the FALP with the aim of placing greater emphasis on the training elements that preserve life. The review is already considering addressing the issue of acute alcohol intoxication and intentional overdoses within Module 2. It is also considering extending the learning in relation to head injuries to Module 2. The matters of concern you raise with relation to the impact of alcohol and the assessment of head injuries will be raised formally at the next meeting (13th December) to assess whether it is feasible and practicable to address these concerns within the scope of the licence.”

Source location

2021-0320-Joint-response-from-College-of-Policing-and-National-Police-Chiefs-Council_Published
Page 2 · response
Published 5 October 2021

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Add essential head-injury guidance to Modules 3 and 4 head-injury training.

Verbatim wording from the response

“iv. The Module 3 and 4 first aid training on head injuries has been amended to incorporate the same essential guidance on head injuries.”

Source location

2021-0320-Response-from-Avon-and-Somerset-Constabulary_Published
Page 3 · response
Published 5 October 2021

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Incorporate head-injury response guidance into Taser, Personal Safety and Public Order training programmes.

Verbatim wording from the response

“v. Avon and Somerset Constabulary officers with responsibility for leading force training in relation to Taser, Personal Safety Training and Public Order training have also been made aware of the Report and of the first aid guidance on head injuries, which have been incorporated into their training programmes.”

Source location

2021-0320-Response-from-Avon-and-Somerset-Constabulary_Published
Page 3 · response
Published 5 October 2021

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Send this response and relevant updated force guidance and training documents to the CoP and NPCC for consideration in national guidance and training decisions.

Verbatim wording from the response

“19. A copy of this response, and relevant updated force guidance and training documents, will also be sent to the CoP and the NPCC so that they are aware of all of the changes that have been made internally by Avon and Somerset Constabulary, and can take these into consideration when determining whether any additional national guidance, or amendments to training provision are required.”

Source location

2021-0320-Response-from-Avon-and-Somerset-Constabulary_Published
Page 4 · response
Published 5 October 2021

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Circulate essential head-injury guidance to all officers, requiring medical assistance to be requested or facilitated where a head injury is suspected.

Verbatim wording from the response

“i. An internal communications bulletin has been sent to all officers which identified head injuries as a matter of concern, and provided a link to “essential guidance” on head injuries. This was included in the “Must know” section of the bulletin, which all officers are required to read. The linked guidance states that if an officer or staff member has any suspicion, or is told in good faith, that a person may have a head injury, they should treat the person as such in the absence of clear evidence to dispel that suspicion. The guidance makes clear that no visible marking is not an acceptable level of evidence that a head injury has not been sustained.”

Source location

2021-0320-Response-from-Avon-and-Somerset-Constabulary_Published
Page 3 · response
Published 5 October 2021

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Update first-aid training, policy or guidance when revised CoP or NPCC requirements are received.

Verbatim wording from the response

“18. Avon and Somerset Constabulary will update its training provision immediately on receipt of any updated guidance from the CoP and / or NPCC.”

Source location

2021-0320-Response-from-Avon-and-Somerset-Constabulary_Published
Page 4 · response
Published 5 October 2021

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Continue reviewing the concerns and working with the CoP and NPCC to implement recommended changes to training, policy and guidance.

Verbatim wording from the response

“17. It is understood that all matters of concern identified at Part 5 of your Report will be reviewed by the NPCC and CoP, including provision of training on head injury, the potential impact of alcohol in masking other underlying conditions, and your recommendations in relation to training material and national policy setting.”

Source location

2021-0320-Response-from-Avon-and-Somerset-Constabulary_Published
Page 4 · response
Published 5 October 2021

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Add essential head-injury guidance to Modules 1, 2 and 4 casualty-assessment training.

Verbatim wording from the response

“iii. The lesson plan for Modules 1, 2 and 4 for “Assess a Casualty (Primary and Secondary survey)” has been amended to require this training to provide the same essential guidance on head injuries.”

Source location

2021-0320-Response-from-Avon-and-Somerset-Constabulary_Published
Page 3 · response
Published 5 October 2021

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Send essential head-injury guidance to all first-aid trainers.

Verbatim wording from the response

“ii. All first aid trainers have been sent the essential guidance on head injuries.”

Source location

2021-0320-Response-from-Avon-and-Somerset-Constabulary_Published
Page 3 · response
Published 5 October 2021

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Existing first-aid training and formal governance routes will address the concerns about police responses to injured or vulnerable people.

Verbatim wording from the response

“My officials have consulted College of Policing and National Police Chiefs Council (NPCC) on their response to your report. As mentioned in their joint letter, front line response police officers receive training at least equivalent to HSE Emergency First Aider level. Our police are required to deal with a wide range of situations on a daily basis and this includes working closely with ambulance services and other medical colleagues when responding to certain medical incidents, where appropriate.”

Source location

2021-0320-Response-from-Home-Office_Published
Page 1 · response
Published 5 October 2021

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

The range of incidents makes it impracticable to train all officers for every medical emergency or specify a response for every context.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Officers are called on to provide first aid in a wide range of incidents as part of their role. The range of incidents they attend mean it is not possible or viable for all officers to be trained for all types of medical emergencies, or for the FALP to explicitly outline the appropriate medical response in every context. That said, as detailed in this response, we acknowledge there is more that we can do to standardise our training and I trust that we have provided you with assurances that the matters of concern you have raised will be addressed.”

Source location

2021-0320-Joint-response-from-College-of-Policing-and-National-Police-Chiefs-Council_Published
Page 2 · response
Published 5 October 2021

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Officers cannot always require members of the public to remain or engage with medical intervention.

Verbatim wording from the response

“i. An internal communications bulletin has been sent to all officers which identified head injuries as a matter of concern, and provided a link to “essential guidance” on head injuries. This was included in the “Must know” section of the bulletin, which all officers are required to read. The linked guidance states that if an officer or staff member has any suspicion, or is told in good faith, that a person may have a head injury, they should treat the person as such in the absence of clear evidence to dispel that suspicion. The guidance makes clear that no visible marking is not an acceptable level of evidence that a head injury has not been sustained.”

Source location

2021-0320-Response-from-Avon-and-Somerset-Constabulary_Published
Page 3 · response
Published 5 October 2021

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

CoP and NPCC are responsible for determining national FALP training and policy changes; the Constabulary will follow their updated guidance.

Verbatim wording from the response

“ii. The CoP is working with clinical leads to review the high level learning outcomes with the aim of placing greater emphasis on the training elements that preserve life, and is presently considering:”

Source location

2021-0320-Response-from-Avon-and-Somerset-Constabulary_Published
Page 4 · response
Published 5 October 2021

Open published response

Other statements in published responses

These actions and other statements could not be clearly connected to one concern in this report.

Recipient-stated actions An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.1

  1. 1

    Review coroner reports and first-aid-related requests as a standing item at NPCC First Aid Forum meetings.

    Stated by College of Policing and National Police Chiefs’ CouncilStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 5 October 2021.

Recipient positions A position is what a recipient says about a concern when they do not describe a specific action.1

  1. 1

    The statement that hospital attendance would probably have prevented death is unsupported by identified expert evidence or findings.

    Stated by Avon and Somerset ConstabularyDisputes the concernThe respondent disagreed with part of the concern or the basis for it.

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Review coroner reports and first-aid-related requests as a standing item at NPCC First Aid Forum meetings.

Verbatim wording from the response

“As a matter of course, all coroner reports and requests related to the provision of first aid by police officers are reviewed by the NPCC First Aid Forum as a standing agenda item. The College is also working with clinical leads to review the high-level learning outcomes within the FALP with the aim of placing greater emphasis on the training elements that preserve life. The review is already considering addressing the issue of acute alcohol intoxication and intentional overdoses within Module 2. It is also considering extending the learning in relation to head injuries to Module 2. The matters of concern you raise with relation to the impact of alcohol and the assessment of head injuries will be raised formally at the next meeting (13th December) to assess whether it is feasible and practicable to address these concerns within the scope of the licence.”

Source location

2021-0320-Joint-response-from-College-of-Policing-and-National-Police-Chiefs-Council_Published
Page 2 · response
Published 5 October 2021

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

The statement that hospital attendance would probably have prevented death is unsupported by identified expert evidence or findings.

Verbatim wording from the response

“6. Consideration has been given to the statement in your Report that “it is highly unlikely that Hamish would have died had he gone to hospital when the police saw him after the incident”. The expert medical evidence and your Ruling dated 25 March 2021 following the hearing of expert evidence on 25-26 February 2021, as well as your findings and conclusion following the hearing of 19-23 July 2021 have been re-reviewed. No expert or other medical evidence, or any Ruling, finding or conclusion has been identified which supports this statement, and it has been noted that paragraphs 17 and 18 of your Ruling dated 25 March 2021 determined that no further medical expert evidence would be obtained.”

Source location

2021-0320-Response-from-Avon-and-Somerset-Constabulary_Published
Page 2 · response
Published 5 October 2021

Open published response
Back to top

Information checked against the published report and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Official responses located
4/4

Data last updated 7 September 2026