PFD report

Colin Alan North · Prevention of Future Deaths report

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

Issued 9 Jan 2020•Birmingham and Solihull

Report record

Published report and response evidence

This page connects the concerns raised in this report with statements found in recipients’ published responses. A link shows a clear evidence connection; it does not assign responsibility.

View original report
Concerns
5

Raised in this report

Recipients
2

Named on the report

Responses found
2

Of 2 recipients

Stated actions
6

Described in responses

Source document

Full report text

This is the full text from the original published report.

Open published report

Concerns and recipient responses

Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

Report evidence summary

Concerns raised5

  1. Failure to control pedestrian access to and movement on the track during vehicle movements
    Part of recurring concern: Unreliable safety arrangements for organised motorsport events
  2. Prize giving procedure taking place on the track amongst moving vehicles
    Part of recurring concern: Unreliable safety arrangements for organised motorsport events
  3. Risk assessment failing to adequately protect pedestrians on the track
    Part of recurring concern: Unreliable safety arrangements for organised motorsport events
Responses linked to these concerns

Each statement is shown once, even when linked to more than one concern.

Actions described in response An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.5

  1. Action

    Produce and distribute interim pedestrian-vehicle segregation controls requiring recovery vehicles to enter only after pedestrians leave the race arena.

    Stated by ORCi LimitedStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 8 February 2020.
  2. Action

    Consult members, review recommendations, and cascade appropriate risk-control recommendations for individual implementation after the industry risk assessment is finalised.

    Stated by ORCi LimitedStated plannedThe respondent said that this action was planned when they made their response on 8 February 2020.
  3. Action

    Prohibit staff from remaining on the track during races.

    Stated by Incarrace LtdStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 8 February 2020.

Respondent positions A position is what a recipient says about a concern when it does not describe a specific action.2

  1. Position

    No staff are permitted on the track during races; officials and medical personnel remain in designated infield areas with controlled access to incidents.

    Stated by Incarrace LtdExisting arrangements considered sufficientThe respondent said that existing arrangements were sufficient, so no further action was needed.

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to control pedestrian access to and movement on the track during vehicle movements

Wider context from the report

“1. The TV recording of the event shows that as soon as the race is concluded the gate to the only entry and exit point is opened. Pedestrians (in using this term I include those working at the event and others) and several recovery vehicles then come through the gate. At the same time Stock Cars remain on the track some undertaking “doughnuts”. There are many pedestrians moving around the track area whilst large recovery vehicles are moving, some at speed, onto the track. There is a complete absence of control of any pedestrians onto and those already on the track. There is no pedestrian walkway on the track and no designated pedestrian safe area. There is a complete lack of awareness of the risk to pedestrians on the track who are in very close proximity to large recovery vehicles. Urgent action is required to review when and how pedestrians should be allowed on the race track at any time during a race event. 2. Urgent action is required to ensure pedestrians on the track have clear protected walkways and safe areas away from large recovery vehicles. 3. Urgent action is required to review the risk assessment document to ensure it adequately protects any pedestrians that need to be on the track. 4. Urgent action is required to review the prize giving procedure and to consider moving this to the “Public Area” as there appears to be no need for it to be undertaken in the middle of the track amongst moving vehicles. 5. Urgent action is required to consider the safety of staff working during the races and whether they should remain on the track given that they are completely unprotected should a vehicle in the race lose control. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Unreliable safety arrangements for organised motorsport events.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Prize giving procedure taking place on the track amongst moving vehicles

Wider context from the report

“1. The TV recording of the event shows that as soon as the race is concluded the gate to the only entry and exit point is opened. Pedestrians (in using this term I include those working at the event and others) and several recovery vehicles then come through the gate. At the same time Stock Cars remain on the track some undertaking “doughnuts”. There are many pedestrians moving around the track area whilst large recovery vehicles are moving, some at speed, onto the track. There is a complete absence of control of any pedestrians onto and those already on the track. There is no pedestrian walkway on the track and no designated pedestrian safe area. There is a complete lack of awareness of the risk to pedestrians on the track who are in very close proximity to large recovery vehicles. Urgent action is required to review when and how pedestrians should be allowed on the race track at any time during a race event. 2. Urgent action is required to ensure pedestrians on the track have clear protected walkways and safe areas away from large recovery vehicles. 3. Urgent action is required to review the risk assessment document to ensure it adequately protects any pedestrians that need to be on the track. 4. Urgent action is required to review the prize giving procedure and to consider moving this to the “Public Area” as there appears to be no need for it to be undertaken in the middle of the track amongst moving vehicles. 5. Urgent action is required to consider the safety of staff working during the races and whether they should remain on the track given that they are completely unprotected should a vehicle in the race lose control. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Unreliable safety arrangements for organised motorsport events.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Risk assessment failing to adequately protect pedestrians on the track

Wider context from the report

“1. The TV recording of the event shows that as soon as the race is concluded the gate to the only entry and exit point is opened. Pedestrians (in using this term I include those working at the event and others) and several recovery vehicles then come through the gate. At the same time Stock Cars remain on the track some undertaking “doughnuts”. There are many pedestrians moving around the track area whilst large recovery vehicles are moving, some at speed, onto the track. There is a complete absence of control of any pedestrians onto and those already on the track. There is no pedestrian walkway on the track and no designated pedestrian safe area. There is a complete lack of awareness of the risk to pedestrians on the track who are in very close proximity to large recovery vehicles. Urgent action is required to review when and how pedestrians should be allowed on the race track at any time during a race event. 2. Urgent action is required to ensure pedestrians on the track have clear protected walkways and safe areas away from large recovery vehicles. 3. Urgent action is required to review the risk assessment document to ensure it adequately protects any pedestrians that need to be on the track. 4. Urgent action is required to review the prize giving procedure and to consider moving this to the “Public Area” as there appears to be no need for it to be undertaken in the middle of the track amongst moving vehicles. 5. Urgent action is required to consider the safety of staff working during the races and whether they should remain on the track given that they are completely unprotected should a vehicle in the race lose control. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Unreliable safety arrangements for organised motorsport events.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Lack of protected pedestrian walkways and safe areas away from recovery vehicles

Wider context from the report

“1. The TV recording of the event shows that as soon as the race is concluded the gate to the only entry and exit point is opened. Pedestrians (in using this term I include those working at the event and others) and several recovery vehicles then come through the gate. At the same time Stock Cars remain on the track some undertaking “doughnuts”. There are many pedestrians moving around the track area whilst large recovery vehicles are moving, some at speed, onto the track. There is a complete absence of control of any pedestrians onto and those already on the track. There is no pedestrian walkway on the track and no designated pedestrian safe area. There is a complete lack of awareness of the risk to pedestrians on the track who are in very close proximity to large recovery vehicles. Urgent action is required to review when and how pedestrians should be allowed on the race track at any time during a race event. 2. Urgent action is required to ensure pedestrians on the track have clear protected walkways and safe areas away from large recovery vehicles. 3. Urgent action is required to review the risk assessment document to ensure it adequately protects any pedestrians that need to be on the track. 4. Urgent action is required to review the prize giving procedure and to consider moving this to the “Public Area” as there appears to be no need for it to be undertaken in the middle of the track amongst moving vehicles. 5. Urgent action is required to consider the safety of staff working during the races and whether they should remain on the track given that they are completely unprotected should a vehicle in the race lose control. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Inadequate physical separation between pedestrians and vehicular traffic.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to protect staff working on the track during races

Wider context from the report

“1. The TV recording of the event shows that as soon as the race is concluded the gate to the only entry and exit point is opened. Pedestrians (in using this term I include those working at the event and others) and several recovery vehicles then come through the gate. At the same time Stock Cars remain on the track some undertaking “doughnuts”. There are many pedestrians moving around the track area whilst large recovery vehicles are moving, some at speed, onto the track. There is a complete absence of control of any pedestrians onto and those already on the track. There is no pedestrian walkway on the track and no designated pedestrian safe area. There is a complete lack of awareness of the risk to pedestrians on the track who are in very close proximity to large recovery vehicles. Urgent action is required to review when and how pedestrians should be allowed on the race track at any time during a race event. 2. Urgent action is required to ensure pedestrians on the track have clear protected walkways and safe areas away from large recovery vehicles. 3. Urgent action is required to review the risk assessment document to ensure it adequately protects any pedestrians that need to be on the track. 4. Urgent action is required to review the prize giving procedure and to consider moving this to the “Public Area” as there appears to be no need for it to be undertaken in the middle of the track amongst moving vehicles. 5. Urgent action is required to consider the safety of staff working during the races and whether they should remain on the track given that they are completely unprotected should a vehicle in the race lose control. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

No recurring-concern membership is currently published.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Produce and distribute interim pedestrian-vehicle segregation controls requiring recovery vehicles to enter only after pedestrians leave the race arena.

Verbatim wording from the response

“• Prior to this, interim control measures (attached) had been produced by the ORCi in conjunction with Incarace and Speedworth following the tragic death of Colin North and these were sent to all ORCi members on or around 25th November 2019. Amongst a global review of procedures, these sought to address the matter of pedestrian / vehicle segregation which were raised in your Regulation 28 Report. We invite your attention to the third to eighth bullet points within these Interim Control Measures which identify the sequence to be followed at the end of a race, requiring recovery vehicles only to enter the track once all pedestrians have exited the race arena, thereby safeguarding them.”

Source location

2020-0003-Response-from-ORCi-Redacted-1
Page 1 · response
Published 8 February 2020

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Consult members, review recommendations, and cascade appropriate risk-control recommendations for individual implementation after the industry risk assessment is finalised.

Verbatim wording from the response

“• The ORCi recognises that, as identified by your Report, appropriate control measures need to be kept under review to ensure practices are safe. We can confirm that we are aware that Incarace are continuing to undertake a process of consultation with experts and professionals to produce a Risk Assessment, including the appropriate control measures, for application across the industry. Once this”

Source location

2020-0003-Response-from-ORCi-Redacted-1
Page 1 · response
Published 8 February 2020

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Prohibit staff from remaining on the track during races.

Verbatim wording from the response

“There are no staff permitted on the track area during a race.”

Source location

2020-0003-Response-from-Incarace-Ltd-Redacted
Page 3 · response
Published 8 February 2020

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Prohibit pedestrians from the track during race events through the revised risk assessment.

Verbatim wording from the response

“The revised Risk Assessment prohibits any pedestrians on the track during a race event.”

Source location

2020-0003-Response-from-Incarace-Ltd-Redacted
Page 1 · response
Published 8 February 2020

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Conduct prize giving only when no vehicles are moving on the track.

Verbatim wording from the response

“The prize giving is now undertaken when there are no moving vehicles on the track.”

Source location

2020-0003-Response-from-Incarace-Ltd-Redacted
Page 2 · response
Published 8 February 2020

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

No staff are permitted on the track during races; officials and medical personnel remain in designated infield areas with controlled access to incidents.

Verbatim wording from the response

“5. Urgent action is required to consider the safety of staff working during the races and whether they should remain on the track given that they are completely unprotected should a vehicle in the race lose control”

Source location

2020-0003-Response-from-Incarace-Ltd-Redacted
Page 3 · response
Published 8 February 2020

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

The prohibition on pedestrians entering the track while vehicles are moving makes designated protected walkways unnecessary.

Verbatim wording from the response

“2. Urgent action is required to ensure pedestrians on the track have clear protected walkways and safe areas away from large recovery vehicles”

Source location

2020-0003-Response-from-Incarace-Ltd-Redacted
Page 2 · response
Published 8 February 2020

Open published response

Other statements in published responses

These actions and other statements could not be clearly connected to one concern in this report.

Recipient-stated actions An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.1

  1. 1

    Distribute the Regulation 28 Report and prioritise its concerns among all members.

    Stated by ORCi LimitedStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 8 February 2020.

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Distribute the Regulation 28 Report and prioritise its concerns among all members.

Verbatim wording from the response

“• Upon receipt of the Regulation 28 Report on 9th January 2020, the ORCi distributed the Report to all its members on the same day and advised that these concerns had been raised as a priority by HM Coroner.”

Source location

2020-0003-Response-from-ORCi-Redacted-1
Page 1 · response
Published 8 February 2020

Open published response
Back to top

Information checked against the published report and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Official responses located
2/2

Data last updated 7 September 2026