PFD report

John Fallon · Prevention of Future Deaths report

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

Issued 4 Nov 2022•Manchester South

Report record

Published report and response evidence

This page connects the concerns raised in this report with statements found in recipients’ published responses. A link shows a clear evidence connection; it does not assign responsibility.

View original report
Concerns
4

Raised in this report

Recipients
1

Named on the report

Responses found
1

Of 1 recipient

Stated actions
3

Described in responses

Source document

Full report text

This is the full text from the original published report.

Open published report

Concerns and recipient responses

Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

Report evidence summary

Concerns raised4

  1. Delays in updating or replacing care home residents' dentures
    Part of recurring concern: Failure to ensure timely required dental care for care-home residents
  2. Failure to routinely carry out SALT assessments when residents transition from eating with dentures to eating without dentures
  3. Failure to routinely alter care home residents' diets to reflect reduced chewing capacity
    Part of recurring concern: Inadequate provision of food for care residents
Responses linked to these concerns

Each statement is shown once, even when linked to more than one concern.

Respondent positions A position is what a recipient says about a concern when it does not describe a specific action.2

  1. Position

    Responsibility for modifying residents’ diets lies with the care home under person-centred care requirements.

    Stated by NHS Greater Manchester Integrated Care BoardRedirects responsibilityThe respondent said that another organisation was responsible for deciding or taking action.

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Delays in updating or replacing care home residents' dentures

Wider context from the report

“2. Evidence was also heard that the limited availability of dental services to care home residents means that situations where dentures require updating/replacing are not being dealt with promptly which means there is a greater risk of choking on food that has not been adequately chewed; ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Failure to ensure timely required dental care for care-home residents.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to routinely carry out SALT assessments when residents transition from eating with dentures to eating without dentures

Wider context from the report

“1. The inquest heard evidence that although he needed his dentures to chew in a satisfactory way, SALT assessments are not routinely carried out where an individual goes from eating with dentures to eating without dentures. As a consequence the diet is not routinely altered in a care home setting to reflect the reduced chewing capacity; ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

No recurring-concern membership is currently published.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to routinely alter care home residents' diets to reflect reduced chewing capacity

Wider context from the report

“1. The inquest heard evidence that although he needed his dentures to chew in a satisfactory way, SALT assessments are not routinely carried out where an individual goes from eating with dentures to eating without dentures. As a consequence the diet is not routinely altered in a care home setting to reflect the reduced chewing capacity; ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Inadequate provision of food for care residents.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Unavailability of suction machines in care homes for staff management of choking

Wider context from the report

“3. NWAS used a suction machine to clear the airway on their arrival. The inquest heard evidence that these are not routinely in place at care homes and so if a resident is choking food cannot be suctioned out by staff. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Failure to ensure essential clinical equipment and supplies are available and serviceable; Unsafe implementation of choking-risk prevention measures.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Responsibility for modifying residents’ diets lies with the care home under person-centred care requirements.

Verbatim wording from the response

“As outlined in the Tameside and Glossop Integrated Care NHS Foundation Trust (TGICFT) Community Dysphagia Policy, swallowing assessments are usually only given to patients who are thought to have swallowing difficulties with fluids, not with food, although the two are likely to coincide. This policy has been shared with colleagues in the community. The Trust would not accept a referral for a swallowing assessment from a care home if the patient’s swallowing difficulty was thought to only be with food. This is because difficulties in swallowing food can be managed by changing the texture of the food that is given to the patient and does not require a specialist assessment, although the Trust would offer advice and support if needed. Under Regulation 9 of the CQC guidance – Person Centred Care, the responsibility for diet modification lies with the care home.”

Source location

Response from Greater Manchester Integrated Care
Page 2 · response
Published 7 November 2022

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

The existing policy considers food-only swallowing difficulties manageable through food texture changes without specialist SALT assessment.

Verbatim wording from the response

“As outlined in the Tameside and Glossop Integrated Care NHS Foundation Trust (TGICFT) Community Dysphagia Policy, swallowing assessments are usually only given to patients who are thought to have swallowing difficulties with fluids, not with food, although the two are likely to coincide. This policy has been shared with colleagues in the community. The Trust would not accept a referral for a swallowing assessment from a care home if the patient’s swallowing difficulty was thought to only be with food. This is because difficulties in swallowing food can be managed by changing the texture of the food that is given to the patient and does not require a specialist assessment, although the Trust would offer advice and support if needed. Under Regulation 9 of the CQC guidance – Person Centred Care, the responsibility for diet modification lies with the care home.”

Source location

Response from Greater Manchester Integrated Care
Page 2 · response
Published 7 November 2022

Open published response

Other statements in published responses

These actions and other statements could not be clearly connected to one concern in this report.

Recipient-stated actions An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.3

  1. 1

    Share learning from this case through Greater Manchester quality, governance and care-home forums to support incorporation into commissioned and local services.

    Stated by NHS Greater Manchester Integrated Care BoardStated plannedThe respondent said that this action was planned when they made their response on 7 November 2022.
  2. 2

    Investigate additional obstructed-airway training that care-home staff could undertake.

    Stated by NHS Greater Manchester Integrated Care BoardStated in progressThe respondent said that this action was in progress when they made their response on 7 November 2022.
  3. 3

    Monitor key learning points and recommendations to ensure they become embedded in practice.

    Stated by NHS Greater Manchester Integrated Care BoardStated plannedThe respondent said that this action was planned when they made their response on 7 November 2022.

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Share learning from this case through Greater Manchester quality, governance and care-home forums to support incorporation into commissioned and local services.

Verbatim wording from the response

“The learning from this safeguarding review has been shared more widely through Tameside’s communication networks and an item is to be taken to their local Care Home Managers Forum in early 2023. Tameside’s quality monitoring and assurance documentation has also now been strengthened to highlight this particular risk (November 22) and support embedding the learning into practice.”

Source location

Response from Greater Manchester Integrated Care
Page 2 · response
Published 7 November 2022

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Investigate additional obstructed-airway training that care-home staff could undertake.

Verbatim wording from the response

“The Safeguarding Review found that staff acted appropriately using their training in basic life support to help Mr Fallon when it was identified he was choking. Emergency services and the Digital Health service were also contacted immediately. Basic life support training including obstructed airway training is included in the care certificate which is part of the mandatory training for all staff. Checks of these training levels are completed at least annually at every contract performance and quality visit, by the Contracts and Commissioning Team. The Team are currently looking into any additional training in relation to obstructed airways that can be undertaken by care home staff.”

Source location

Response from Greater Manchester Integrated Care
Page 3 · response
Published 7 November 2022

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Monitor key learning points and recommendations to ensure they become embedded in practice.

Verbatim wording from the response

“In conclusion, key learning points and recommendations will be monitored to ensure they are embedded within practice. NHS GM is committed to improving outcomes for the population of Greater Manchester.”

Source location

Response from Greater Manchester Integrated Care
Page 4 · response
Published 7 November 2022

Open published response
Back to top

Information checked against the published report and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Official responses located
1/1

Data last updated 7 September 2026